You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Spec mapping (AQA 7037): Paper 2, §3.2.2 Changing Places — Categories of place; the factors contributing to the character of places; how people perceive, engage with and form attachments to places, and how they present and represent the world to others. This lesson develops place identity, perception and attachment; the insider/outsider dimension of perception; and the affective concepts of topophilia and topophobia. It links to §3.2.1 (global flows reshape identity — a global sense of place) and to §3.2.3 (urban places are sites where identities are most actively contested). Assessment objectives: AO1 — the concepts and theorists of identity, perception and attachment; AO2 — application to named places with contrasting identities; AO3 — interpretation and evaluation of representational sources (marketing, film, photography) as evidence of perception.
How do people perceive places? Why do some places carry warm, positive associations while others are stigmatised before a visitor ever arrives? Why do people grieve when a place changes? This lesson explores how place identity is constructed, perceived, attached to, and contested — drawing on the work the AQA specification expects: Tuan (1974, 1977) on topophilia, Relph (1976) on placelessness and insidedness, Massey (1991, 1994) on a progressive, power-laden sense of place, and Cresswell (2004) on place as socially constructed. Understanding perception is essential because places are experienced differently by different groups, and because media, marketing and policy shape our understanding of places we have never visited. Perception, in short, is never a neutral window onto a place but is always filtered through who we are, where we stand and what we have been shown — and those filters have real consequences for how places are treated, funded and represented.
Place identity refers to the distinctive character of a place — the combination of physical features, social characteristics, cultural associations, and emotional meanings that make it recognisable and distinguishable from other places. Place identity is partly given (geology, climate, historic built form) and partly constructed (through marketing, media and the everyday practices of residents); it is, in Cresswell's terms, socially constructed and therefore always open to being remade and contested. It is also relational — a place's identity is defined partly by what it is not, by contrast with other places (the North against the South, the city against the countryside, "rough" against "respectable" neighbourhoods) — so identities are always formed in comparison. It operates at multiple, nested scales:
| Scale | Example |
|---|---|
| Personal | "My neighbourhood" — shaped by daily routines, memories, social networks |
| Local | "Sheffield" — industrial heritage, "Steel City," sporting culture |
| Regional | "The North" — distinct from "The South" in economic structure, political culture, accent, identity |
| National | "England" — associations with landscape, culture (pubs, cricket, tea), history (monarchy) |
| Global | "London" — world city, financial centre, multicultural hub, tourist destination |
A-Level Analysis: Place identity is never fixed or singular. Sheffield, for example, holds several competing identities simultaneously: the "Steel City" of industrial heritage; the "Outdoor City" marketed to tourists and investors (it borders the Peak District); the university city of student bars and shared houses; and the deprived city of eastern wards with high unemployment. Which identity dominates depends on who is describing the place and for what purpose — a point at the heart of AO3.
Attachment is the emotional bond between people and places. Yi-Fu Tuan coined topophilia (in Topophilia, 1974) to describe the affective tie between a person and a place — the love of place, the warmth, pride and sense of belonging a location can evoke. Its opposite, topophobia, describes fear, aversion or anxiety associated with a place. These are not trivial "moods" but powerful geographical forces: topophilia underpins residents' fierce defence of places threatened by change, fuels return migration, and drives the heritage and conservation movements; topophobia shapes where people will and will not go, hollowing out "no-go" areas after dark and steering investment away from stigmatised districts. Both are learned and socially patterned, not innate — which means they can be deliberately cultivated (by place-marketers building affection for a re-imaged city) or inadvertently produced (by neglectful design that makes a place feel threatening).
| Concept | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Topophilia | A positive emotional bond — affection, belonging, pride | A resident's love of the Yorkshire Dales; the pride of a former pit village in its colliery band |
| Topophobia | A negative emotional response — fear, aversion, anxiety | A pedestrian's fear of a poorly lit underpass; the dread some feel in a place associated with past trauma |
Attachment intensifies with length of residence, depth of social ties, and life-stage — children and the elderly often show especially strong attachment to their immediate locality. Crucially, attachment helps explain resistance to change: when a familiar place is threatened by demolition, gentrification or regeneration, residents experience the loss as something close to bereavement — a reaction sometimes called "root shock." This is why placemaking and regeneration are so often contested (a theme developed in later lessons).
Key Example: When the Heygate Estate in Elephant and Castle, South London, was demolished as part of regeneration (largely cleared by 2014), long-standing residents described losing not just homes but a community — the social networks, shared spaces and collective memory that constituted their attachment to the place. The new development's higher prices meant many could not return, illustrating how attachment and displacement intersect.
Attachment does not appear instantly; it is built through repeated, embodied engagement with a place over time. Geographers identify several mechanisms through which the bond develops, and being able to explain them lifts an answer from describing that people are attached to explaining why:
A-Level Analysis: Because attachment is built through time, routine and relationship, it is unevenly distributed. The newly arrived, the highly mobile and the transient (students, short-term renters) typically hold weaker attachment than long-settled residents — which is one reason gentrifying areas can feel socially "thin" even when physically improved. Attachment is also a source of power asymmetry in place conflicts: those with deep attachment have the most to lose from change but are not always those with the most influence over it.
Perception refers to how people understand, interpret, and feel about places. It is built from two streams of experience:
graph LR
A[Perception of Place] --> B[Direct Experience]
A --> C[Indirect Experience]
B --> D[Living/working there]
B --> E[Visiting]
B --> F[Sensory engagement]
C --> G[Media representations]
C --> H[Place marketing]
C --> I[Education/textbooks]
C --> J[Word of mouth]
Key Example: Jaywick, Essex, has been repeatedly named England's most deprived neighbourhood by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD 2010, 2015, 2019). National media coverage consistently portrays it through images of dilapidated 1930s chalets and poverty statistics — a reporter from a US news channel once filmed there as an example of "broken Britain." For residents, however, Jaywick is also a seaside community with strong social bonds, cheap housing and a fierce sense of solidarity, and a residents' campaign has actively pushed back against the stigmatising "most deprived" label. The gap between media perception and lived experience is exactly what AQA wants you to analyse.
A useful way to make perception visible is the mental map (or cognitive map) — a sketch of an area drawn from memory. Pioneered in urban studies by Kevin Lynch (The Image of the City, 1960), who found that people structure their image of a city around recurring elements — paths (routes), edges (barriers), districts (recognisable quarters), nodes (focal points) and landmarks — mental maps reveal that no two people carry the same image of a place in their heads. What a person includes, exaggerates, shrinks or omits exposes their priorities, their daily geography and their positionality:
A-Level Analysis: Mental maps are a primary-data technique for studying perception directly, and they are highly examinable because they make the abstract concept of "perception" concrete and comparable. They demonstrate that a place has no single image but as many images as it has perceivers, each shaped by age, gender, length of residence and routine — a vivid, fieldwork-friendly application of the insider/outsider and positionality concepts.
The media plays a powerful role in shaping how places are perceived, particularly by people who have never visited them. Representations can be positive or negative, and they can reinforce or challenge existing stereotypes.
| Media Form | Example | Effect on Place Perception |
|---|---|---|
| Television drama | Peaky Blinders (BBC, 2013–2022), set in Birmingham | Renewed interest in Birmingham's industrial heritage; tourist trails to filming locations; challenged the lazy perception of Birmingham as "dull" |
| News coverage | Reporting of knife crime in London | Reinforces a perception of London as dangerous, focused on certain boroughs (Hackney, Newham); disproportionately shapes perceptions of ethnic-minority communities |
| Film | The Full Monty (1997), set in Sheffield | Humanised deindustrialisation but also entrenched stereotypes of Northern working-class struggle |
| Social media | Instagram photography of the Cotswolds | Promotes an idealised, picturesque image that attracts tourists but obscures rural poverty, housing unaffordability and lost services |
| Literature | The Brontë novels set on the Yorkshire Moors | Forged enduring associations between the moors and wildness, romance and isolation — drawing visitors to Haworth and the Brontë Parsonage Museum |
Exam Tip: When discussing media representations, always evaluate their impact — do not merely list them. Apply the questions: Who created it? For what audience? What is included and excluded? How does it compare to statistical data or lived experience? This critical analysis is the AO3 skill that separates the top band from competent description.
The deepest point about media representation is that it does not merely reflect places — it can actively shape them, through a feedback loop sometimes called the "spiral of stigma." When a place is repeatedly represented as deprived, dangerous or declining, three consequences follow. First, investment is deterred: businesses, developers and home-buyers avoid places with poor reputations, starving them of the capital that might improve them. Second, residents internalise the stigma: studies of stigmatised estates find that residents may come to feel ashamed of their address, withhold it from employers, and lose confidence in their community — a phenomenon the sociologist Loïc Wacquant terms "territorial stigmatisation." Third, policy responds to the image rather than the reality: a place labelled "broken" attracts heavy-handed, top-down intervention that may override residents' own priorities. The representation thus helps produce the very decline it claims merely to describe. Conversely, a positive re-imaging can set off a virtuous cycle of investment and confidence — which is exactly why cities spend heavily on place-marketing. For the geographer, the key implication is that representations are not innocent descriptions to be checked against "the facts"; they are forces with material consequences, and analysing them is analysing how places are made and unmade.
Key Example: Jaywick's repeated national billing as "England's most deprived neighbourhood" is a textbook spiral of stigma. The label, derived from IMD rankings and amplified by sensational reporting, has made the village a byword for poverty, deterred investment and distressed residents — to the point that a local campaign group has actively contested the representation, insisting on the community's strengths and asking journalists to stop using the village as visual shorthand for "broken Britain." The episode shows residents as active agents contesting how their place is represented, not passive victims of the image.
Many places engage in deliberate place marketing — strategic campaigns designed to attract investment, tourists, residents or students by constructing a positive image. The deliberate alteration of a place's image is called re-imaging (or rebranding), and is examined in depth in the regeneration lesson.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.