You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Spec mapping (AQA 7037): Paper 2, §3.2.2 Changing Places — Place studies: students are required to undertake two place studies — (1) a local place in which they live or study, and (2) a contrasting and distant place — exploring the development of the character of the places; how the people who live there relate to and engage with the place; the lived experience of the place in the past and present; how the place has been represented; the role of endogenous and exogenous factors and continuity and change. This lesson develops the local (near) place study through a real, well-attested UK example — Sharrow / the London Road quarter of Sheffield — combining primary-style qualitative and quantitative evidence. It links to §3.2.1 (Sharrow's character is shaped by global migration) and §3.2.3 (it is an inner-urban place). Assessment objectives: AO1 — the place-study framework and concepts; AO2 — application to a real local place across time; AO3 — interpreting and triangulating contrasting quantitative and qualitative sources about that place.
The AQA specification requires you to study two contrasting places: one local to you (your "near place") and one more distant or contrasting (your "far place"). The near-place study is distinctive because it is the one where you can gather your own primary data and bring genuine insider knowledge — advantages the far place cannot offer — and the specification expects you to exploit that closeness through fieldwork while remaining alert to the blind spots familiarity creates. This lesson focuses on the local place study — and, crucially, it does not merely teach the method in the abstract but works a real near place in depth, so you can see how the framework is applied. The exemplar place is the Sharrow and London Road quarter of inner-south Sheffield, a genuinely diverse, changing inner-urban area with strong, well-documented character and a wealth of accessible primary and secondary evidence. Treat it as a model for how to build your own local place study: establish the character and how it developed, explore lived experience and how residents relate to the place, trace change and continuity over time, and set contrasting representations against one another. The same structure — character, lived experience, change, representation, all underpinned by endogenous and exogenous factors — applies whatever local place you study, from a market town to a city-centre quarter to a coastal village.
A "near place" is somewhere you can visit repeatedly, observe directly and collect primary data in — your home neighbourhood, a local high street, a nearby market or estate. The first analytical task is to define its boundary, which is rarely obvious: places shade into one another, and where you draw the line shapes what you study. Sharrow, for example, can be defined administratively (the Sharrow ward), perceptually (the area residents call Sharrow), or functionally (the catchment of the London Road shopping street) — and these three boundaries do not coincide, so each would produce a slightly different "place" and different data. A strong study states explicitly which definition it uses and why, recognising that the boundary is a choice that frames the whole investigation rather than a natural fact.
Exam Tip: The examiner assesses your ability to apply geographical concepts to a real place, not your knowledge of a famous location. A modest local high street studied with conceptual rigour scores far higher than a famous city described superficially. Always choose somewhere you can revisit and where you can develop genuine insider knowledge — but stay alert to the blind spots that insider familiarity creates.
Sharrow lies immediately south of Sheffield city centre, straddling the valley of the River Sheaf and the long ribbon of London Road, historically the main southern route out of the city. Its character is the cumulative product of clearly traceable endogenous and exogenous factors:
This is, in miniature, Massey's progressive sense of place: an identity built from global connections and successive migrations, layered rather than erased, and visibly "switched on" to the wider world.
A near-place study must trace how the place has changed and what has endured, because Changing Places is fundamentally about process. Sharrow's trajectory can be set out as a sequence of phases, each driven by an identifiable combination of factors:
| Phase | Dominant character | Key drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Victorian–Edwardian | Densely built industrial inner suburb housing workers in Sheffield's metal and cutlery trades | Endogenous: radial routeway, valley site; exogenous: the wider industrial economy of the "Steel City" |
| Mid-20th century | Ageing terraced housing; early post-war change, some slum clearance and council building in the wider inner city | Government housing policy (exogenous); the beginnings of industrial decline |
| Late 20th century | Arrival and growth of successive migrant communities; emergence of London Road as a multicultural shopping street; deindustrialisation reshaping the surrounding labour market | International migration and globalisation (exogenous); cheap inner-urban housing (endogenous) |
| 21st century | A super-diverse, independent-retail high street with strong community institutions; emerging gentrification and studentification pressure on the fringes | Continued migration; university expansion; rising interest in inner-urban living (exogenous) |
The crucial analytical move is to hold change and continuity together. Sharrow has changed profoundly — from a homogeneous Victorian workers' district to one of the most diverse quarters in the North — yet striking continuities persist: the Victorian street grid and General Cemetery, the enduring role of London Road as a corridor of small independent commerce rather than national chains, and a long tradition of active community organisation that runs from Victorian philanthropy through to today's Sharrow Festival and development trust. A place study that captures only change, or only continuity, is incomplete; the character of a real place is precisely the tension between the two over time.
A-Level Analysis: Notice how each phase is driven by the interaction of endogenous and exogenous factors rather than by either alone — the same integrated analysis emphasised throughout the course. This is also where the place study connects to the deindustrialisation and gentrification themes of later lessons: Sharrow is simultaneously a product of past industrial growth, of the migration that followed industrial decline, and of the gentrification pressures now reshaping inner-urban Britain.
Sharrow is widely experienced by residents as friendly, diverse and intensely local — a place of strong community institutions despite, and partly because of, its diversity. It hosts the long-running Sharrow Festival (a community-organised celebration in Mount Pleasant Park), a thriving community forum and development trust tradition, and grassroots organisations rooted in its different communities. For many residents the area's diversity and its independent, non-corporate high street are precisely the sources of topophilia and pride. For others — and the same place is experienced differently by different people — issues of deprivation, traffic, parking pressure on London Road, and perceptions of crime shape a more ambivalent or topophobic relationship to parts of the area. The student-rental fringe adjoining the universities adds a transient population whose attachment is shallower and more temporary, illustrating how a single near place contains multiple, unequal experiences side by side.
How residents engage with and relate to the place is something the specification asks you to address directly, and Sharrow offers rich material. People engage as consumers and producers (shopping at and running the independent businesses that define London Road), as participants in community life (the festival, faith institutions, community gardens and forums), and as place-shapers who actively defend and improve the area through development trusts and campaigns. This active, participatory relationship is the hallmark of a place with strong collective sense of place — and it contrasts sharply with the more passive, transactional relationship that transient or affluent newcomers may have. Mapping who engages how is therefore a powerful analytical lens: it exposes the unequal distribution of attachment and influence that the later place-making and conflict lesson examines, and it guards against the lazy assumption that "the community" experiences a place as one.
A-Level Analysis: Lived experience is not a single, agreed thing even within one street. A Yemeni grocer, a third-generation white working-class resident, a Somali community organiser, a final-year student renting a terraced house, and a young professional drawn by the area's "edgy authenticity" each relate to Sharrow differently — and the very feature one celebrates (diversity, independence, change) may be the feature another laments. Capturing this plurality of lived experience, rather than flattening it into a single narrative, is what distinguishes a sophisticated place study from a postcard description.
The strongest place studies use mixed methods, combining formal (quantitative) and informal (qualitative) evidence and triangulating them. The diagram shows the logic:
graph LR
A[Research Question:<br/>character & change in Sharrow] --> B[Quantitative evidence]
A --> C[Qualitative evidence]
B --> D["Land-use survey, census<br/>profile, IMD decile, footfall"]
C --> E["Resident interviews, photography,<br/>oral history, mental maps"]
D --> F["Triangulation:<br/>sources cross-checked &<br/>combined for a rounded picture"]
E --> F
Key Definition: Triangulation is the use of multiple data sources or methods to cross-check findings and raise confidence. When quantitative data, qualitative testimony and secondary sources point the same way, a conclusion is well supported; where they diverge, that divergence is itself a finding worth analysing. Indeed, the most interesting findings in a place study often lie in the gap between sources — as in Sharrow, where the divergence between "statistically deprived" and "experientially vibrant" is precisely the point worth making, not a problem to be smoothed over.
Note how this combination delivers exactly what the specification asks of a place study: the formal sources establish the area's measurable demographic and economic profile, while the informal sources recover the lived experience, attachment and sense of place that the numbers cannot reach — and the interpretation row does the analytical work of reconciling them.
| Data type | Method / source | Illustrative finding about Sharrow |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative (formal) | Land-use survey of London Road | Ground-floor units are dominated by independent food retail and restaurants from many cultures, with very few national chains and a notable vacancy rate — a quantitative signature of an independent, multicultural high street rather than a "clone town" |
| Quantitative (formal) | Census 2021 ethnicity profile | The area is markedly more ethnically diverse than the Sheffield and England averages, with substantial Asian, Black, Arab, Chinese and Eastern European populations — no single group dominant |
| Quantitative (formal) | Index of Multiple Deprivation | Much of Sharrow falls within the more-deprived national deciles on income, employment and health domains — statistically a "deprived" inner-urban area |
| Qualitative (informal) | Semi-structured resident/trader interview | A long-standing trader: "You can buy ingredients from anywhere in the world on this one street — that's what makes it special; people come across the city for it." — testimony to pride and the area's draw |
| Qualitative (informal) | Photography | Multilingual shopfront signage, street art, the bustle of the market and grocers — visual evidence of a layered, globally connected sense of place |
| Qualitative (informal) | Community oral history / festival records | Accounts of the Sharrow Festival and community organisations evidence strong social bonds and active placemaking by residents themselves |
| Combined interpretation | Triangulation | Although formal data classes Sharrow as "deprived," qualitative and observational evidence reveals a vibrant, diverse, community-oriented place whose character and attachment the IMD score alone entirely misses — the central lesson about combining sources |
To build your own near-place study you will gather primary data. The tables below summarise the core techniques; the essential exam skill is to justify each method by linking it to your research question.
| Method | What it measures | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land-use survey | Function of each ground-floor unit/space | Objective, mappable, reveals economic character | A single visit is a snapshot, not change |
| Pedestrian/footfall count | How busy a place is, by location and time | Quantifiable and comparable | Does not explain why people are present; weather/event effects |
| Environmental quality survey (EQS) | Litter, noise, greenery, building condition, scored on a scale | Produces mappable numerical data | Scoring is subjective between surveyors |
| Building condition survey | Physical state of the built environment | Indicates investment or neglect | Exterior may not reflect interior; subjective |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.