You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Spec mapping (AQA 7037): Paper 2, §3.2.1 — global governance and the institutions, norms, laws and organisations that regulate global issues; the concept of global governance "from the local to the global"; the role of international institutions (the UN) and the SDGs. Synoptic links to §3.2.4 (Resource Security and Population — the UN governs food security via the FAO and health via the WHO) and to the global-commons and inequality lessons that follow. AOs: AO1 (UN structure, Security Council, peacekeeping, SDGs, named cases — Rwanda, Srebrenica, the Gulf War), AO2 (explaining why the UN succeeds in some contexts and fails in others) and AO3 (interpreting peacekeeping, funding and SDG-progress data).
The United Nations (UN) is the world's most important institution of global governance. Founded in 1945 in the aftermath of the Second World War, it is the most ambitious attempt in history to build a framework for international cooperation and collective security. Evaluating its structure, functions, achievements and limitations is the core task of any governance question.
Key Definition: Global governance refers to the complex of formal and informal institutions, mechanisms, laws, norms and processes through which collective interests at a global scale are articulated, rights and obligations established, and differences mediated. Crucially, it does not mean a "world government" — there is no global sovereign — but rather a web of cooperation operating across scales, from local NGOs to the UN Security Council.
Before focusing on the UN, it helps to see the whole governance landscape and where the UN sits within it:
| Domain | Key institution(s) | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Peace & security | UN Security Council | Authorise sanctions, peacekeeping, force |
| Trade | WTO | Rules and dispute settlement (Lesson 3) |
| Finance | IMF, World Bank | Stability, development lending (Lesson 4) |
| Health | WHO | Disease control, pandemic response |
| Environment | UNFCCC / Paris Agreement | Climate negotiation (Lesson 8) |
| Justice | International Court of Justice; International Criminal Court | Inter-state and individual accountability |
This shows global governance is poly-centric — no single body governs everything; the UN is the political core but operates alongside specialised regimes. International law and norms (the UN Charter, the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions) provide the normative backbone, even where enforcement is weak.
The UN was established on 24 October 1945 by 51 founding member states (now 193). Its creation was driven by the determination to avert a third world war after the catastrophic failure of the League of Nations (1920–1946) — which collapsed partly because it lacked the great powers (the USA never joined) and any enforcement capacity. The UN's design learned from this: it built the great powers into its core (the P5 veto) precisely to keep them inside the tent.
The UN Charter sets out four key purposes:
The UN comprises six principal organs plus numerous specialised agencies, programmes and funds.
graph TD
A[United Nations] --> B[General Assembly]
A --> C[Security Council]
A --> D[ECOSOC]
A --> E[International Court of Justice]
A --> F[Secretariat]
A --> G["Trusteeship Council<br>Suspended 1994"]
B --> B1["193 member states<br>One state, one vote"]
C --> C1[5 Permanent Members + 10 Non-Permanent]
D --> D1["Coordinates UN agencies<br>UNDP, UNICEF, WHO"]
F --> F1["Secretary-General<br>António Guterres"]
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Membership | All 193 member states |
| Voting | One state, one vote — regardless of size or wealth |
| Powers | Can discuss any Charter issue; passes non-binding resolutions; approves the budget |
| Sessions | Annual regular session (Sept–Dec); special sessions on specific issues |
| Significance | The most democratic organ — but its resolutions carry moral, not legal, force |
The Security Council is the UN's most powerful organ, with primary responsibility for international peace and security.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Membership | 5 permanent members (P5): USA, UK, France, Russia, China; 10 non-permanent members elected for 2-year terms |
| Voting | Decisions need 9 of 15 affirmative votes; any P5 member can exercise a veto |
| Powers | Can authorise sanctions, peacekeeping and military action; its resolutions are legally binding |
| Key limitation | The veto paralyses the Council whenever P5 interests conflict |
The veto is the Council's most controversial feature — the structural heart of the UN's effectiveness debate:
| Arguments for the veto | Arguments against the veto |
|---|---|
| Keeps major powers inside the UN (the League failed without them) | Lets a single state block action against world opinion |
| Prevents the UN acting against a great power, which could escalate to wider war | Used over 300 times, often to shield allies and national interests |
| Reflects the reality that enforcement needs great-power backing | Renders the Council impotent on its gravest cases — Russia vetoed Syria resolutions around 16+ times |
| The threat of veto can force compromise | The P5 composition fossilises the power map of 1945, ignoring India, Africa, Latin America |
UN peacekeeping deploys military and civilian personnel to conflict zones to maintain peace and support political processes — the UN's most visible coercive-ish activity, governed by the principles of consent, impartiality and minimum use of force.
| Successes | Failures |
|---|---|
| Helped end conflicts in Mozambique, Cambodia and El Salvador | Failed to prevent the Rwandan genocide (1994) — ~800,000 killed in 100 days |
| Supervised elections and democratic transitions | Failed to protect civilians at Srebrenica (1995) — ~8,000 Bosniak men and boys massacred in a UN "safe area" |
| Monitored ceasefires and separated combatants | Scandals involving sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers |
| Delivered humanitarian assistance | Often under-mandated — unable to use force to protect civilians |
| Highly cost-effective relative to alternatives | Wholly dependent on member states supplying troops and funds |
Case Study: Rwanda 1994. The UN force (UNAMIR), under Canadian General Roméo Dallaire, had only ~2,500 troops and a restrictive mandate. Despite Dallaire's explicit warnings of imminent genocide, the Security Council — shaped by US reluctance to intervene after the 1993 Somalia ("Black Hawk Down") debacle — cut rather than reinforced the mission. Around 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were killed in 100 days. Rwanda is the defining moral failure of the UN system and the case that later drove the "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) doctrine (UN World Summit, 2005) — the principle that sovereignty entails a duty to protect, and that the international community may intervene when a state fails to do so.
In September 2015 all 193 member states adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development — 17 SDGs and 169 targets — succeeding the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs, 2000–2015). The MDGs are widely credited with focusing aid and halving extreme poverty; the SDGs are broader, universal (applying to rich countries too) and environmental as well as social.
| Goal | Title | Key target |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No Poverty | End extreme poverty (below US$2.15/day) by 2030 |
| 2 | Zero Hunger | End hunger; achieve food security |
| 4 | Quality Education | Inclusive, equitable quality education |
| 5 | Gender Equality | Empower women and girls |
| 10 | Reduced Inequalities | Reduce inequality within and between countries |
| 13 | Climate Action | Urgent action on climate change |
| 16 | Peace, Justice, Strong Institutions | Just, peaceful, inclusive societies |
| 17 | Partnerships for the Goals | Strengthen global partnerships |
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Universal — apply to all countries, not only developing ones | Non-binding — no enforcement mechanism |
| Comprehensive — economic, social and environmental | 169 targets risk diluting focus and priority |
| Inclusive process — civil society and private sector | Progress uneven — COVID-19 reversed gains on poverty, education, health |
| Measurable — specific indicators per target | Vast financing gap — estimated trillions of dollars per year |
| Built on MDG lessons | Critics call them aspirational rather than actionable |
Exam Tip: The SDGs perfectly illustrate the core tension of global governance — the UN can build remarkable consensus (193 states agreeing 17 goals) but cannot enforce it (the goals are voluntary). Use them to argue that the UN excels at "soft" norm-setting but is structurally weak on "hard" enforcement.
The UN system reaches far beyond the principal organs:
| Agency | Focus | Key achievement |
|---|---|---|
| WHO | Global public health | Eradicated smallpox (1980); coordinated (imperfectly) the COVID-19 response |
| UNICEF | Children's welfare | Mass immunisation; child protection |
| UNHCR | Refugees | Protects tens of millions of displaced people (Lesson 5) |
| UNESCO | Education, science, culture | World Heritage Sites; literacy programmes |
| FAO | Food and agriculture | Monitors global food security (links to §3.2.4) |
| UNDP | Development | Publishes the Human Development Index (Lesson 9) |
These agencies are where the UN is arguably most effective — humanitarian and technical work that does not directly threaten great-power interests and therefore escapes the veto.
Global governance is not only about organisations (the UN) but about international law and norms — the rules and shared expectations that constrain state behaviour even without a global police force. AQA expects you to understand both the power and the limits of international law.
The normative foundations include the UN Charter (which outlaws aggressive war), the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (which, though not itself binding, seeded a body of binding human-rights treaties), the Geneva Conventions (the laws of armed conflict) and a dense web of treaties on trade, the sea, the environment and arms control. These create norms — standards of appropriate behaviour — that shape what states feel able to do and to be seen to do.
Two judicial bodies attempt to enforce international law:
| Body | Jurisdiction | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|
| International Court of Justice (ICJ) | Disputes between states; advisory opinions; sits at The Hague | States must consent to its jurisdiction; rulings depend on compliance (a great power can simply ignore an adverse ruling) |
| International Criminal Court (ICC) | Prosecutes individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, aggression (Rome Statute, 2002) | Major powers (USA, China, Russia, India) are not members; relies on states to arrest suspects; charged with bias towards Africa |
The recurring lesson is the same as the Security Council veto: international law is as strong as states' willingness to comply. The ICJ can rule, the ICC can indict (it issued an arrest warrant for Russia's President over Ukraine in 2023), but neither commands an army or a police force. Enforcement ultimately depends on states — which is why international law is most effective against the weak and least effective against the powerful, a profound equity problem in global governance. Yet norms still matter: even powerful states expend great effort denying or justifying violations rather than ignoring the rules outright, which is itself evidence of the constraining power of normative governance (Lesson 9 develops this for inequality).
A sophisticated understanding of global governance recognises that it operates "from the local to the global" and involves far more than states and the UN. The specification's phrase "from the local to the global" signals that governance is multi-scalar and poly-centric.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) — there are over 40,000 operating internationally — are now major governance actors. They perform several roles:
Governance also runs through private and hybrid bodies: credit-rating agencies, the ISO standards body, the Forest Stewardship Council, the Fairtrade Foundation (Lesson 3) and bond markets all regulate behaviour across borders. And it runs through other inter-state institutions beyond the UN — the G7 and G20 (informal summitry coordinating the major economies, the G20 elevated to the premier forum after 2008), regional bodies (the EU, the African Union, ASEAN) and the Bretton Woods institutions (Lesson 4).
graph TD
A[Global Governance Actors] --> B["States<br>(sovereignty, the unit of the system)"]
A --> C["The UN system<br>(Security Council, agencies)"]
A --> D["Other IGOs<br>(WTO, IMF, World Bank, G20, EU, AU)"]
A --> E["International courts<br>(ICJ, ICC)"]
A --> F["NGOs / civil society<br>(Amnesty, Greenpeace, Oxfam, MSF)"]
A --> G["Private/hybrid bodies<br>(ratings agencies, ISO, Fairtrade)"]
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.