You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Spec mapping (AQA 7037): Paper 2 (Human), §3.2.2 Changing Places — the concepts of place; the importance of location, locale and sense of place; how places are experienced, perceived and given meaning; place attachment and identity. Synoptic links run to §3.2.3 Contemporary Urban Environments (gentrification and regeneration remake sense of place and displace identity — Lessons 4–5) and forward to insider/outsider perspectives (Lesson 7) and representation (Lesson 8). This is a conceptual and theoretical lesson weighted toward AO1 (the named theorists and their concepts) and AO2 (applying those concepts to real places and to change), with a worked AO3 exercise interpreting perception data.
"Place" is one of geography's three foundational concepts (alongside space and environment), and the Changing Places unit demands that you treat it not as a synonym for "location" but as location + meaning. A grid reference is a space; a place is that space invested with human experience, memory, emotion and identity. The signature A-Level skill in this lesson is to deploy named theorists — Tuan, Relph, Massey, Cresswell, Augé — as analytical tools for real places undergoing real change, rather than reciting definitions. The most common weakness is to describe a place's character; the examiner wants you to theorise how that character is produced, experienced and contested.
Before the theorists, fix three terms (after the geographer John Agnew, who defined place as having three elements):
A full geographical account of any place addresses all three. The Changing Places unit also distinguishes how places can be categorised: near vs far (experiential distance, not just kilometres), experienced vs media (places we know directly vs places we know only through representation — Lesson 8), and insider vs outsider (Lesson 7). Holding these distinctions ready is what lets you write analytically rather than descriptively.
Yi-Fu Tuan is one of the most influential humanistic geographers. His concept of topophilia — literally "love of place" — describes the affective bond between people and their environment.
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Aesthetic | Visual beauty; admiration of landscape | Tourist photographing the Lake District |
| Tactile | Physical, bodily engagement with place | A farmer knowing every field by touch and season |
| Sentimental | Emotional attachment through memory and association | Childhood home; grandparents' village |
| Patriotic | Identification with homeland; nationalistic attachment | "This green and pleasant land" |
Tuan's work is foundational because it established that place is not merely a physical location but a centre of meaning and value. His humanistic geography — emerging in the 1970s as a reaction against the purely quantitative, "spatial science" geography of the 1960s — insisted that the subjective, experiential and emotional dimensions of place are proper objects of geographical study, not soft extras to be tidied away. This is why the Changing Places unit explicitly asks you to consider how places are perceived and given meaning, not just how they are structured.
A concrete illustration sharpens the concept. Consider a former coal-mining village in the South Wales valleys or County Durham. To an outsider with an OS map it is a location — a cluster of terraces on a contour. To its residents it is saturated with topophilia: the pit that employed three generations (now a memorial), the miners' welfare hall, the male-voice choir, the chapel, the rugby club — a dense web of memory, identity and belonging that persists even after the economic reason for the village's existence has gone. The strength of attachment to such places, and the grief that accompanies their decline, is unintelligible without Tuan's concept. Equally, topophilia explains why communities resist the demolition of an "ugly" but beloved building, or why displaced people (Lesson 4) suffer not just materially but existentially — they lose a centre of meaning, not merely an address.
Exam Tip: When discussing Tuan, always link to specific examples. Rather than simply defining topophilia, explain how a particular community's attachment to a place (e.g., a mining village, a coastal town, a market square) illustrates the concept — and connect it to change, since the unit is "Changing Places".
Edward Relph developed one of the most influential critiques of modern landscapes through his concept of placelessness — the loss of distinctive local identity and the creation of standardised, anonymous environments.
Relph argued that our experience of place depends on the degree to which we are inside or outside it:
| Level | Description | Depth of Experience |
|---|---|---|
| Existential insideness | Deep, unselfconscious belonging; feeling completely at home | Deepest |
| Empathetic insideness | Deliberate effort to understand a place's identity and meaning | Deep |
| Behavioural insideness | Awareness of a place's activities and functions without deep engagement | Moderate |
| Incidental outsideness | Place experienced as background; no conscious attention to its qualities | Shallow |
| Objective outsideness | Place observed dispassionately, as data or landscape | Shallow |
| Existential outsideness | Feeling alienated, not belonging; sensing that a place is foreign or hostile | Alienation |
Relph argued that modern forces — mass communication, mass culture, big business, centralised authority, and the economic system — are creating placelessness: environments that look the same everywhere and lack authentic identity.
Characteristics of placelessness:
Relph's thesis is powerful and intuitively recognisable — most students can immediately picture a "could-be-anywhere" retail park — but it must be handled critically rather than accepted wholesale. Three lines of critique matter. First, it can be nostalgic and elitist: lamenting the loss of "authentic" place often privileges a particular (frequently middle-class, frequently past) idea of what counts as authentic, and can disparage the ordinary places (the suburb, the chain café) that millions experience as genuinely meaningful. Second, it can underestimate human agency: people actively re-place standardised spaces, personalising a chain coffee shop into "their" regular, or a generic estate into a loved home full of memory — so placelessness is never total. Third, Massey's relational critique (above) argues that what Relph sees as loss of place can equally be the making of a new, hybrid place. The mature position is that Relph identifies a real and important tendency — the corporate homogenisation of landscape — without it being the whole story: places are simultaneously being standardised (Relph) and re-differentiated (Massey), often at the same time and in the same street.
Doreen Massey challenged traditional notions of place as bounded, fixed, and internally homogeneous. Her concept of a progressive sense of place (also called a global sense of place) reconceptualised place as open, dynamic, and constituted through connections.
Massey illustrated her ideas through Kilburn High Road in north-west London:
Massey's work is politically important because it offers an alternative to exclusionary or nostalgic senses of place that define belonging in terms of ethnicity, birth, or tradition. Her progressive sense of place embraces diversity, change, and openness.
A-Level Analysis: Massey's framework is particularly useful for analysing multicultural urban areas, areas experiencing in-migration, or places undergoing rapid change. It provides a theoretical basis for arguing that change does not destroy place identity but transforms it.
Tim Cresswell (Place: A Short Introduction, 2004; Place: An Introduction, 2015) has done much to consolidate and extend the humanistic tradition for contemporary geography, and his ideas are directly examinable. Three of his contributions are especially useful.
First, Cresswell argues that place is a "way of seeing, knowing and understanding the world" — not just an object out there but a lens through which geographers (and people generally) make sense of space. To call somewhere a "place" is already to attribute meaning and value to it.
Second, he foregrounds the concept of "in place" and "out of place". Places carry implicit rules about what — and who — belongs. When something or someone is judged "out of place" (graffiti on a war memorial; a rough sleeper in a luxury shopping mall; travellers on a village green), the resulting reaction reveals the normally invisible norms and power relations that govern the place. This makes place inherently political: defining what is "in place" is an act of power that includes some and excludes others — a direct bridge to insider/outsider perspectives (Lesson 7) and to the displacement and "frontier" language of gentrification (Lesson 4).
Third, Cresswell synthesises the field into three broad approaches to place that a top answer can name and weigh:
Cresswell's value at A-Level is that he gives you the meta-language to compare the other theorists: Tuan and Relph are broadly phenomenological (place as lived experience and belonging), Massey is social-constructionist (place as open, relational, produced by flows), and naming this lets you evaluate rather than merely list them.
Place attachment refers to the emotional bond between individuals or communities and specific places. Psychologists and geographers distinguish between:
Genius loci (literally "spirit of place") is a concept derived from Roman religion and revived by architectural theorist Christian Norberg-Schulz (1979). It refers to the distinctive atmosphere or character that makes a place unique.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.