You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Second World War and the Holocaust represent the catastrophic culmination of Nazi rule and the most destructive period in modern European history. For a breadth study of the German quest for political stability, the years 1939–1945 form the violent climax of the authoritarian and racial trajectory traced from 1871: a regime that had abolished the rule of law at home now exported destruction across a continent, and a state that defined politics in terms of designated enemies pursued the systematic murder of those it had defined as racially alien. The period must be studied with analytical precision and moral seriousness in equal measure.
This lesson approaches the war and the Holocaust as historians do: by analysing causes, mechanisms, decision-making and significance. It does not narrate atrocity for its own sake. The aim is to understand why Germany succeeded militarily before failing catastrophically; how and why a policy of persecution escalated into genocide; how the regime mobilised its economy and society for total war; and how far ordinary Germans knew of, and were implicated in, the crimes committed in their name. These are demanding questions of historical explanation, and they sit at the heart of the AQA interpretations assessment. The key questions are: why did Germany initially succeed and then fail militarily; how and why did persecution escalate into systematic genocide; and how far were ordinary Germans complicit?
Key Question: Was the Holocaust the implementation of a long-held plan, or the outcome of a process of cumulative radicalisation decisively shaped by the war in the East — and how do these interpretations bear on questions of responsibility?
Key Definition: The Holocaust (Shoah) refers to the systematic, state-sponsored murder of approximately six million European Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators between 1941 and 1945, carried out alongside the persecution and murder of millions of other victims, including Roma and Sinti, disabled people, Slavic civilians, Soviet prisoners of war, and political and religious opponents. Its scale and systematic character must be represented accurately and never minimised.
This lesson sits within Paper 1, Option 1L, a breadth study, in Part Two ('A Nation Brought Low? Germany, 1914–1991'). It addresses the impact of the Second World War on Germany and the radicalisation of Nazi racial policy into genocide, themes that the specification treats as central to the period 1939–1945.
| AO | What it rewards | How this lesson builds it |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 (largest) | Accurate, detailed knowledge and analysis framed by second-order concepts | The course and turning points of the war, the war economy, and the dated escalation of persecution into genocide, analysed through causation and significance |
| AO3 (Section A headline) | Analysis and evaluation of differing interpretations | The intentionalist–functionalist debate on the origins of the Holocaust, evaluated through named historians |
| AO2 (transferable) | Analysis and evaluation of primary sources in context | Worked evaluation of the Wannsee Conference protocol as a source, by provenance, purpose and content-in-context |
The change-and-continuity threads are: the radicalisation of Nazi policy under the pressures of war; the relationship between military strategy and ideological warfare in the East; the mobilisation of the economy and society for total war; and the moral and historical reckoning that this period imposed on Germany's place in the world and that frames the entire post-1945 half of the course.
In the first two years the German armed forces achieved a sequence of rapid victories through combined-arms 'lightning war' (Blitzkrieg) and the strategic surprise of their opponents:
| Campaign | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | September 1939 | Conquered in around five weeks; partitioned with the USSR under the Nazi–Soviet Pact |
| Denmark and Norway | April 1940 | Occupied to secure Swedish iron-ore supply routes |
| France and the Low Countries | May–June 1940 | France defeated in six weeks; armistice signed 22 June 1940 |
| Battle of Britain | July–October 1940 | The RAF denied the Luftwaffe air superiority; the invasion plan (Sea Lion) was postponed indefinitely |
| Balkans and North Africa | 1941 | Yugoslavia and Greece conquered; Rommel's Afrika Korps deployed to Libya |
| Operation Barbarossa | 22 June 1941 | Invasion of the USSR — the decisive strategic gamble that defined the rest of the war |
These victories rested on operational skill and surprise rather than overwhelming material superiority, and they masked the structural weaknesses — limited raw materials, finite manpower, an economy already stretched — that would tell once the war became prolonged.
The following timeline summarises the war's trajectory:
timeline
title Germany at War 1939-1945
1939 : Invasion of Poland - war begins
1940 : Fall of France : Battle of Britain
1941 : Operation Barbarossa - invasion of USSR
1942 : Stalingrad begins : peak of conquest
1943 : Stalingrad surrender : Kursk : turning point
1944 : D-Day : July Plot fails
1945 : Soviet advance : unconditional surrender
Albert Speer, appointed Minister for Armaments in February 1942, presided over substantial production increases despite intensifying Allied bombing:
| Year | Aircraft | Tanks |
|---|---|---|
| 1941 | 11,776 | 3,790 |
| 1942 | 15,409 | 6,180 |
| 1943 | 24,807 | 12,063 |
| 1944 | 40,593 | 19,002 |
Adam Tooze argues that these gains reflected the belated full mobilisation of an economy that had previously fallen short of its potential, rather than a managerial 'miracle' of Speer's making, and that Germany could never match Allied combined output — the United States alone produced over 96,000 aircraft in 1944. The 'Speer myth', he contends, was partly Speer's own postwar construction.
Forced labour was integral to the war economy and inseparable from the regime's racial policy. By 1944 around 7.7 million foreign civilian workers and prisoners — including prisoners of war and concentration-camp inmates — were exploited in German agriculture and industry, in conditions that ranged from harsh to deliberately lethal according to the regime's racial hierarchy. The exploitation of slave labour, including the principle of 'extermination through labour', links the war economy directly to the crimes examined below.
The mobilisation of the German economy for war was, paradoxically, slower and less total than that of its democratic enemies for much of the conflict. Until 1942 the regime hesitated to impose the full burdens of a war economy on the home front, conscious of the corrosive effect that wartime privation had had on morale in 1916–18 and anxious to preserve civilian consumption and the 'Hitler myth'. It was only after the reverses of 1941–42 that Goebbels could call publicly for 'total war' — in his Sportpalast speech of February 1943, delivered in the shadow of Stalingrad — and that Speer's rationalisation of armaments production was given fuller rein. Even then, ideological constraints (notably reluctance to mobilise German women as fully as Britain did) and the sheer disparity of resources meant that German output, though it peaked impressively in 1944, could never match the combined productive weight of the United States, the USSR and the British Empire. The structural argument that Germany's economic position made a short, victorious war essential — and a long war unwinnable — is central to Tooze's interpretation and helps explain both the timing and the recklessness of the regime's strategic gambles.
The war transformed daily life in Germany. Rationing was introduced from the outset; conscription removed millions of men; and from 1942 the intensifying Allied bombing campaign brought the war directly to German cities, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians, displacing millions and necessitating mass evacuations of children and the vulnerable. Joseph Goebbels's Propaganda Ministry worked to sustain morale through a combination of managed news, appeals to national solidarity, and — as the military situation deteriorated — the cultivation of fear of Soviet revenge and the promise of 'wonder weapons' (Wunderwaffen) that would reverse Germany's fortunes. The regime also tightened terror at home: the People's Court under Roland Freisler handed down ever more death sentences, and the slightest expressions of 'defeatism' could be lethal. The cohesion of German society under such pressures — the absence of the kind of collapse that had occurred in 1918 — owed something to genuine belief, something to the apparatus of terror, and much to the awareness, especially after the demand for unconditional surrender, that there was no obvious way out. Historians continue to debate the balance of these factors, but the contrast with 1918 is itself an important analytical point in a breadth study.
The destruction of European Jewry was not a single event but the end-point of a process of escalating persecution. Studying it historically means tracing that escalation, identifying the decisive radicalising moments, and weighing the competing explanations of how and why it occurred.
| Phase | Period | Key developments |
|---|---|---|
| Legal discrimination | 1933–38 | Boycott of Jewish businesses (1933); the Nuremberg Laws (1935) stripped Jews of citizenship and prohibited intermarriage |
| Violence and forced emigration | 1938–39 | The Reichspogromnacht ('Kristallnacht', 9–10 November 1938) saw synagogues destroyed and around 30,000 Jewish men sent to concentration camps; emigration was forced and despoiled |
| Ghettoisation | 1939–41 | After the conquest of Poland, Jews were confined to overcrowded ghettos (Warsaw, Łódź) under conditions of starvation and disease |
| Mass shootings | 1941 | Following the invasion of the USSR, the Einsatzgruppen and other units murdered approximately 1.5 million Jews by shooting in the occupied Soviet territories |
| Systematic, industrialised murder | 1942–45 | The Wannsee Conference (20 January 1942) coordinated the logistics of the 'Final Solution'; dedicated killing centres (Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Sobibór, Bełżec, Chełmno, Majdanek) were used to murder Jews deported from across occupied Europe |
The overall scale — approximately six million Jewish victims — is established beyond serious historical doubt and is documented through perpetrator records, demographic analysis and survivor testimony.
The so-called 'euthanasia' programme (codenamed T4) murdered an estimated 70,000–100,000 disabled people between 1939 and 1941. Historians regard it as a precursor to the Holocaust: it developed killing techniques, deception methods and a cadre of personnel, some of whom were later transferred to the killing centres in occupied Poland.
The invasion of the USSR in June 1941 was conceived and conducted as a war of annihilation (Vernichtungskrieg), not a conventional campaign. Criminal orders such as the Commissar Order, the ideological framing of the conflict as a struggle against 'Judeo-Bolshevism', the deliberate starvation of Soviet prisoners of war, and the operations of the Einsatzgruppen brought millions more Jews under German control, normalised mass killing, and created the conditions in which genocide became operationally and psychologically conceivable. Most historians now see the invasion of the East as the decisive context for the transition from persecution and shooting to systematic, continent-wide extermination.
A central and morally weighty historical question concerns the breadth of complicity in these crimes. Christopher Browning's study Ordinary Men (1992) examined Reserve Police Battalion 101, a unit of middle-aged German men — many of working-class background, not committed Nazis — who took part in mass shootings in occupied Poland. Browning argued that conformity to the group, deference to authority, careerism and a gradual brutalisation, rather than fanatical ideology or coercion, best explain their participation; significantly, those who asked to be excused were generally permitted to step aside, which complicates any defence based on duress. Daniel Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners (1996), drawing on much of the same evidence, advanced the contrary thesis that a peculiarly German 'eliminationist anti-Semitism' had prepared ordinary Germans to become willing killers. Goldhagen's argument attracted enormous public attention but was widely criticised by historians for essentialising German culture, neglecting comparative evidence of perpetration by other nationalities, and underrating situational factors. The debate between Browning and Goldhagen is a model AO3 case study, because it turns on the interpretation of the same documentary base.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.