You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Tony Blair's decade in power (May 1997 – June 2007) was the longest continuous period of Labour government in history and brought the post-war story of the depth study to its close. His "New Labour" project — the "Third Way" claimed to lie between old-style socialism and Thatcherite free-market conservatism — transformed his party, won three successive general elections (the only Labour leader ever to do so), and delivered the most extensive programme of constitutional reform of the century alongside huge increases in public spending. Yet Blair's legacy is inseparable from the Iraq War of 2003, which split his party and the country, fatally eroded the trust on which his appeal had rested, and ultimately forced him from office.
The central analytical question of the period is the nature of New Labour: was it a genuine third way, a distinctive synthesis of economic efficiency and social justice; or was it essentially "Thatcherism with a human face," accepting the Conservative economic settlement while softening its edges; or simply a triumph of electoral pragmatism over ideology? This question, and the verdict on Iraq, frame the assessment of the whole New Labour decade.
Key Question: How far did New Labour represent a genuine break from Thatcherism, and how should the achievements of the Blair governments be weighed against the catastrophe of the Iraq War?
Key Definition: The Third Way — the political philosophy, theorised by the sociologist Anthony Giddens (The Third Way, 1998), that sought to transcend the old divide between social democracy and neo-liberalism by combining acceptance of the market economy and globalisation with active investment in education, health and opportunity to promote social justice.
This lesson concludes Part Two of Paper 2, Option 2S — The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007 ("The Impact of Thatcherism and Beyond, 1979–2007"), taking the course to its 2007 terminus. As a depth study, examiners reward precise command of New Labour's constitutional reforms, its public-service investment and the chronology of the road to Iraq, analysed through second-order concepts.
| Key Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Background | Born in Edinburgh (1953); educated at Fettes College and Oxford; a barrister; MP for Sedgefield from 1983 — part of the modernising generation that entered Parliament after the 1983 disaster |
| Modernisation | Became Labour leader on 21 July 1994 after the sudden death of John Smith, accelerating the modernisation begun by Kinnock and Smith and rebranding the party "New Labour" |
| Clause IV | In 1995 Blair persuaded the party to rewrite Clause IV of its constitution, abandoning the historic 1918 commitment to "common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange" in favour of a "dynamic economy" and a "just society" — a totemic symbol of the break with Labour's socialist past |
| The Third Way | Influenced by Anthony Giddens, Blair sought to combine economic efficiency (embracing the market and globalisation) with social justice (investment in opportunity), positioning Labour on the centre ground |
New Labour's rise must be understood against the backdrop of four election defeats and the lessons learned from them. The modernisers concluded that to win, Labour had to reassure "Middle England" on tax, the economy, crime and defence — abandoning unilateral nuclear disarmament, accepting the bulk of the Thatcher trade-union laws and privatisations, and pledging to stick to Conservative spending plans for its first two years. The disciplined, professional party machine — symbolised by the influence of communications strategists such as Alastair Campbell and Peter Mandelson, and the focus-group politics chronicled by Philip Gould — was itself a deliberate contrast to the divided, "unelectable" Labour of the 1980s and the warring Conservatives of the 1990s. The 1997 landslide (a majority of 179) reflected both this transformation and the exhaustion of the Major government.
Blair's government carried through the most far-reaching constitutional changes since the early twentieth century:
| Reform | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scottish devolution | The Scotland Act 1998 created the Scottish Parliament (opened 1999), with powers over health, education, law and transport and a limited tax-varying power, following a decisive "yes" referendum (1997) |
| Welsh devolution | The Government of Wales Act 1998 created the National Assembly for Wales, initially with more limited, non-primary-legislative powers than Scotland |
| Northern Ireland | The Good Friday Agreement (10 April 1998) established a power-sharing Assembly, North–South bodies and arrangements for decommissioning, approved by referendums on both sides of the border — completing the process Major had begun |
| House of Lords | The House of Lords Act 1999 removed all but 92 hereditary peers; promised further (elected) reform was never delivered, leaving an unfinished, largely appointed chamber |
| Human Rights Act 1998 | Incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, allowing British courts to adjudicate convention rights directly |
| Freedom of Information Act 2000 | Gave a right of access to information held by public authorities (in force 2005); Blair later regretted it |
| Greater London Authority | The 1999 Act created an elected Mayor of London and Assembly; Ken Livingstone won the first mayoralty in 2000 as an independent after being blocked by the party |
| Policy | Detail |
|---|---|
| Education | "Education, education, education" — literacy and numeracy hours raised primary standards; the City Academies programme (from 2000) created state-funded schools outside local-authority control; tuition fees were introduced (1998) and then "top-up" fees of up to £3,000 (2004, carried only after a huge backbench rebellion that cut the majority to five) |
| Health | NHS spending in England roughly tripled in nominal terms across the decade — the largest sustained increase since 1948; maximum waiting times fell sharply, the NHS Plan (2000) set ambitious targets, and Foundation Trusts (from 2004) introduced greater autonomy and a quasi-market |
| Poverty | The National Minimum Wage (introduced 1999, opposed by the Conservatives) raised low pay without the predicted job losses; tax credits redistributed substantial sums to working families; Blair pledged in 1999 to end child poverty "within a generation," and relative child poverty fell markedly (though the target was missed); Sure Start centres supported families in deprived areas |
| Economy | Bank of England independence (granted within days of taking office, May 1997) symbolised New Labour's pursuit of economic credibility; under Chancellor Gordon Brown's "prudence," the long boom continued with low inflation and falling unemployment — though the deregulated finance inherited from Big Bang would end in the 2008 crisis under Brown's premiership |
The economic and social record is genuinely double-edged, and a strong answer holds the elements in tension: substantial redistribution and investment (minimum wage, tax credits, NHS spending, falling child poverty) coexisted with continuity in the Thatcherite framework (privatisation extended, finance deregulated, top income-tax rates untouched until the very end). New Labour redistributed "by stealth" while loudly reassuring the wealthy — the essence of its "third way" compromise.
Crime policy exemplified the New Labour synthesis. Blair's slogan as shadow Home Secretary — "tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" — captured the attempt to combine a traditionally Conservative emphasis on order with a traditionally Labour concern for social causes, and the government pursued both record prison numbers and Sure Start-style early intervention. The introduction of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs, 1998) became emblematic of this authoritarian-communitarian streak, as did the long and ultimately abandoned battle to introduce identity cards. Stylistically, the early Blair years were also defined by "Cool Britannia" — a deliberate association of the government with a resurgent British popular culture, fashion and music — and, above all, by Blair's deft handling of the public grief after the death of Diana, Princess of Wales (31 August 1997), when his description of her as "the People's Princess" caught the national mood and confirmed his early mastery of the politics of emotion and presentation. These features — the focus on presentation, the communitarian rhetoric, the courting of "Middle England" — are as much a part of the New Labour phenomenon as its formal policies, and help to explain both its appeal and the later charge of "spin."
To understand Iraq, one must grasp the foreign-policy doctrine Blair developed before it. New Labour came to office promising an "ethical dimension" to foreign policy (a phrase associated with Foreign Secretary Robin Cook), and a series of earlier interventions seemed to vindicate it.
| Intervention | Detail |
|---|---|
| Kosovo (1999) | Blair was a leading advocate of NATO's air campaign against Serbia to halt the ethnic cleansing of Kosovar Albanians, and pressed a reluctant Washington towards the threat of ground forces. The eventual Serb withdrawal was widely seen as a success for armed humanitarianism |
| Sierra Leone (2000) | A British military intervention helped end a brutal civil war and stabilise the elected government — a small, swift and genuinely successful operation that bolstered Blair's confidence in the use of force for good |
| The Chicago speech (April 1999) | Blair set out a doctrine of "international community," arguing that in a globalised world the international community could be justified in intervening in the internal affairs of states to prevent humanitarian catastrophe |
These successes are analytically important because they shaped the mindset that led to Iraq: a conviction that Western military power could and should be used to remove tyrants and prevent atrocity, and a self-belief — reinforced by Kosovo and Sierra Leone — that Blair's moral and strategic judgement could be trusted. The disaster of Iraq must be weighed against this record of earlier interventions that were, by contrast, broadly judged successful — a contrast that is itself a rich source of analysis.
The wider context after 11 September 2001 transformed the strategic picture. Blair pledged to stand "shoulder to shoulder" with the United States, and Britain joined the invasion of Afghanistan (October 2001) to topple the Taliban regime that had harboured al-Qaeda. The "war on terror" framing, and Blair's determination to keep Britain at the centre of American strategy, set the stage for the far more controversial commitment in Iraq — and the 7 July 2005 London bombings (the "7/7" attacks, which killed 52 people) brought the consequences of the terror threat brutally home.
The Iraq War is the event that overshadows all else in the assessment of Blair, and a precise command of its sequence is essential.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| September 2002 | The government's "September Dossier" on Iraqi weapons included the claim that some could be deployed within 45 minutes — later shown to rest on weak intelligence |
| 15 February 2003 | Over a million people marched against the war in London — the largest demonstration in British history |
| 18 March 2003 | The Commons voted 412 to 149 to authorise military action; 139 Labour MPs rebelled — the largest backbench revolt by a governing party's MPs in modern times |
| 20 March 2003 | The invasion began; major combat was declared over by May, but no weapons of mass destruction were ever found |
| January 2004 | The Hutton Inquiry into the death of the weapons expert Dr David Kelly reported; its exoneration of the government was widely derided as a "whitewash" |
| July 2016 | The Chilcot Report concluded that the UK joined the invasion "before the peaceful options for disarmament had been exhausted," that the intelligence case was presented with "a certainty that was not justified," and that post-war planning was "wholly inadequate" |
Historiographical anchor. Anthony Seldon (Blair and Blair Unbound, 2004–07) argues that Blair genuinely believed in the WMD threat and in the moral case for removing Saddam Hussein, and presents Iraq as a sincere if catastrophic misjudgement. John Kampfner (Blair's Wars, 2003) argues that Blair's Atlanticism and his determination to stand "shoulder to shoulder" with George W. Bush committed him to war well before the parliamentary vote and the diplomatic process had run their course. The Chilcot Report's measured but damning conclusions have become the dominant historical judgement, and Iraq is now widely seen as the wound that destroyed the trust underpinning Blair's premiership.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.