You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Great Terror of 1936–1938 (the Great Purges) was one of the most terrifying episodes in modern history. A regime turned on its own party, its own military, and its own people, unleashing a wave of mass repression that consumed millions of lives. Understanding the nature, scale, and purpose of Stalinist terror — and its intimate relationship with the cult of personality — is essential for evaluating the character of the mature Stalinist state.
The terror did not come from nowhere. It grew out of a Bolshevik tradition of state violence reaching back to the Cheka and the Red Terror of the Civil War, and out of the upheavals of collectivisation and the famine that had already accustomed the regime to mass death. Yet the purges of the late 1930s were qualitatively new: they turned the machinery of repression inward, against the party and state elite that had built the system, and they reached down into ordinary society on a scale that has made the Terror a byword for totalitarian rule.
For a breadth study of 1855–1964, the Terror is the extreme point on the long Russian spectrum of state repression — a spectrum that runs from the Third Section and the Okhrana of the tsars, through Lenin's Cheka, to the NKVD of the 1930s and, later, the more restrained policing of the Khrushchev years. It poses, more starkly than any other episode, the central question of how far the Soviet state was an instrument of one man's will and how far it had a logic and momentum of its own.
Key Question: Were the Great Purges of 1936–38 the product of Stalin's personal design and paranoia, or of a system that generated terror with a momentum partly beyond any individual's control?
Key Definition: The Great Terror — the campaign of mass arrests, show trials, executions and deportations that peaked in 1936–38, directed first against the party and military elite and then against wide sections of society. Its most intense phase, the mass operations of 1937–38, is known as the Yezhovshchina after NKVD chief Nikolai Yezhov.
This lesson belongs to the Stalinist section of Paper 1, Option 1H: Tsarist and Soviet Russia, 1855–1964 — a breadth study. The Terror and the cult of personality define the political character of the regime in the 1930s and supply essential material for change-and-continuity argument about repression and autocracy across the century.
Change-and-continuity threads: the long history of the Russian secret police and political repression; the relationship between ideology and violence; the recurring problem of dissent under autocracy; and the construction of leader-cults from the Lenin cult of the 1920s to its repudiation in 1956.
Terror was not new to the Soviet system. The Cheka, War Communism, and the Red Terror had established a precedent for state violence against perceived enemies, and Lenin had defended terror openly as a weapon of class war. However, the scale and character of Stalinist terror in the 1930s were qualitatively different: it was turned against the regime's own elite, conducted through elaborate public ritual, and pushed to a paroxysm in 1937–38 that even the Civil War had not seen.
| Event | Date | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Shakhty Trial | 1928 | Engineers accused of 'wrecking'; established the pattern of show trials and scapegoating |
| Industrial Party Trial | 1930 | Further show trials of alleged saboteurs |
| Deportation of kulaks | 1929–33 | Demonstrated the regime's willingness to use mass repression against entire social categories |
| Famine | 1932–33 | The state's indifference to mass death normalised extreme violence |
| Ryutin Affair | 1932 | Party member Ryutin circulated a document calling for Stalin's removal; Stalin demanded the death penalty (overruled by the Politburo) |
The assassination of Sergei Kirov, the popular Leningrad party boss, on 1 December 1934 was the catalyst for the Great Purges.
The circumstances remain controversial:
Regardless of who was responsible, Stalin used Kirov's murder to launch an unprecedented campaign of repression. On the day of the assassination, he issued a decree ordering the summary trial and execution of 'terrorists' — cases were to be investigated in no more than ten days, with no right of appeal.
Exam Tip: The murder of Kirov is a crucial turning point. It matters less who actually killed Kirov than how Stalin used the event. The strongest answers will recognise this and focus on the political consequences rather than the forensic question of guilt.
Three great show trials were staged in Moscow, each designed to demonstrate the existence of vast conspiracies against the Soviet state:
| Trial | Date | Defendants | Charges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial of the Sixteen | August 1936 | Zinoviev, Kamenev, and 14 others | Conspiring with Trotsky to assassinate Soviet leaders; all confessed and were executed |
| Trial of the Seventeen | January 1937 | Radek, Pyatakov, and 15 others | 'Wrecking', sabotage, and espionage on behalf of Germany and Japan; 13 executed |
| Trial of the Twenty-One | March 1938 | Bukharin, Rykov, Yagoda, and 18 others | Espionage, treason, and planning to dismember the USSR; 18 executed |
The confessions were obtained through:
Key Definition: Show trial — a public trial in which the verdict is predetermined, designed primarily for propaganda purposes. The Moscow Show Trials of 1936–38 were intended to demonstrate that opposition to Stalin was tantamount to treason and foreign espionage.
The historian Stephen Kotkin argues that the show trials served multiple purposes: eliminating potential rivals, creating an atmosphere of fear, and providing scapegoats for economic failures.
The term Yezhovshchina ('the Yezhov era') refers to the period of mass terror in 1937–38, when the purges reached their peak under NKVD chief Nikolai Yezhov.
| Category | Estimated Numbers |
|---|---|
| Arrested | Approximately 1.5 million in 1937–38 |
| Executed | At least 680,000–750,000 (based on NKVD records released after 1991) |
| Sent to Gulag | Approximately 1.3 million in the same period |
| Total Gulag population | Peaked at approximately 1.9 million in 1938 |
The purges were not directed solely at party leaders — they consumed every level of Soviet society:
The NKVD operated on a system of quotas — each region was assigned targets for arrests, executions, and sentences. Local officials often exceeded their quotas to demonstrate zeal.
The Gulag (Main Directorate of Camps) was a vast network of forced labour camps spread across the Soviet Union, from the Arctic to Central Asia.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Population | Between 1.5 and 2 million prisoners at any given time in the late 1930s |
| Mortality | Death rates varied but could reach 20–25% per year in the harshest camps |
| Labour | Prisoners worked in mining, construction, logging, and canal-building |
| Conditions | Starvation rations, brutal cold, inadequate clothing, arbitrary violence by guards |
| Economic role | The Gulag produced gold, timber, coal, and built major infrastructure projects (the White Sea-Baltic Canal, the Moscow-Volga Canal) |
Key Definition: Gulag — the system of Soviet forced labour camps. At its peak, the Gulag held approximately 2 million prisoners, who were used as slave labour in remote and hostile environments. The Gulag was both an instrument of political repression and an economic institution.
The terror was accompanied by an extraordinary cult of personality that portrayed Stalin as an infallible genius and father of the nation.
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Images | Stalin's portrait hung in every office, school, factory, and public building |
| Titles | 'Father of the Peoples', 'Great Leader and Teacher', 'Genius of All Humanity' |
| History rewritten | Stalin was depicted as Lenin's closest comrade and the architect of the October Revolution; Trotsky and other rivals were airbrushed from photographs |
| Art and literature | Socialist Realism was the only permitted artistic style; all culture was required to glorify the party and Stalin personally |
| Education | History textbooks were rewritten to centre Stalin's role; children were taught to love and obey Stalin |
| Personality | Stalin was portrayed as wise, humble, caring, and close to ordinary people — the opposite of reality |
The cult served several functions:
Exam Tip: The cult of personality and the terror were intimately connected. The cult created an atmosphere in which Stalin was beyond criticism, while the terror ensured that anyone who questioned him was destroyed. When analysing Stalin's power, consider how the cult and the terror reinforced each other.
Why the purges happened — and how far they were Stalin's deliberate work — is among the defining controversies of twentieth-century history, and the prime example of the totalitarian–revisionist divide running through this course. The opening of the Soviet archives after 1991 reshaped, without ending, the debate.
Robert Conquest (The Great Terror, 1968) argues that:
J. Arch Getty (Origins of the Great Purges, 1985) argues that:
Drawing on the archives, Oleg Khlevniuk and Stephen Kotkin have argued that:
| Interpretation | Core claim | Strength | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conquest (totalitarian) | Top-down design driven by Stalin | Captures Stalin's central role and ruthlessness | Can overstate coherence and underrate the chaos and the social dynamics |
| Getty (revisionist) | Chaos, denunciation, local dynamics | Restores agency below the leadership; explains the terror's spread | The archival orders show more central direction than early revisionism allowed |
| Khlevniuk / Kotkin (post-revisionist) | Stalin-directed but system-amplified | Best fits the archival evidence; integrates intention and dynamics | A synthesis that resists a single tidy thesis |
Exam Tip: In Section A, do not simply line these schools up. The strongest line, on current evidence, is that the Terror was both centrally ordered (the 1937 mass-operation orders and quotas) and locally amplified — that Stalin's design and the system's momentum were not alternatives but worked together.
A representative source for this topic is a show-trial transcript or published confession — for example, the official record of the 1938 Trial of the Twenty-One, in which Bukharin and others 'confessed' to fantastic crimes. Such sources demand the most careful handling.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.