You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Seizing power in October 1917 was the easy part. Holding power against a host of enemies — rival socialist parties, White armies, foreign interventionists, peasant insurgents and even dissent within the revolutionary camp — was the supreme challenge, and the one on which the entire future of the Soviet experiment turned. Between 1917 and 1921 the Bolsheviks created the institutions and adopted the methods that would define the Soviet state for the rest of its existence: the secret police, one-party rule, censorship, terror and centralised economic control. How and why those choices were made is the central question of this lesson, because it bears directly on the deepest debate of the whole course — whether Soviet authoritarianism was forced on the Bolsheviks by the desperate circumstances of civil war or flowed from their ideology and Lenin's conception of the dictatorship of the proletariat.
This is a period in which the second-order concept of change and continuity does heavy analytical work: continuity with the coercive habits of Tsarism (a secret police, censorship, a militarised state) coexists with revolutionary novelty (class war as state policy, the abolition of private property). The lesson reconstructs the consolidation in detail and trains the AO2 source-evaluation skill on the documents through which it is known — Cheka reports, Lenin's decrees and directives, Kronstadt resolutions, White and émigré testimony.
Key Question: Did the Bolsheviks consolidate power through terror and dictatorship because the circumstances of civil war forced them to, or because such methods were inherent in their ideology?
Key Definition: Cheka (the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage) — the Bolshevik political police, established in December 1917 under Felix Dzerzhinsky. It conducted arrests, interrogations and executions without judicial oversight and became the instrument of the Red Terror — the prototype of every later Soviet security organ (GPU, OGPU, NKVD, KGB).
This lesson covers the consolidation phase of Component 2N, Part One ('The Russian Revolution and the Rise of Stalin, 1917–1929'), within a Paper 2 DEPTH study. It is where the nature of the Soviet state is forged — the Cheka, one-party rule, terror and War Communism — so it underpins every later judgement about Lenin's regime and Stalin's inheritance. A depth study rewards granular command of the detail: the Constituent Assembly results and its dissolution, the terms of Brest-Litovsk, the structure of the Red Army, the policies of War Communism and the Kronstadt demands, deployed to sustain argument.
In Assessment Objective terms, AO1 (knowledge deployed to analyse and judge) carries the greatest weight and dominates Section B, where questions ask why the Bolsheviks survived or how far terror was central to their victory. AO2 — the evaluation of primary sources in context — is the headline skill of Section A, and the consolidation is rich in usable types: Cheka and Red Terror directives, Lenin's decrees, the Kronstadt Petropavlovsk resolution, White-army and foreign accounts. AO3 (historians' interpretations) is examined directly in other components but is a transferable habit, and the 'ideology versus circumstance' debate sharpens the judgement Section B demands. Note that AQA 7042 has no Paper 3: 'Section A' and 'Section B' are the two halves of this Paper 2. Frame your analysis with causation, change and continuity and the relative significance of factors.
The Bolsheviks moved at once to build a new apparatus of rule, fusing revolutionary improvisation with the coercive logic of a party that meant to keep power. The first weeks produced the skeleton of the Soviet state.
| Institution | Detail |
|---|---|
| Sovnarkom (Council of People's Commissars) | The new government, with Lenin as chairman; initially included Left SRs as junior partners |
| Cheka (December 1917) | The secret police, under Felix Dzerzhinsky; tasked with 'combating counter-revolution and sabotage' |
| Red Guards | Armed workers who served as the regime's initial military force |
| Soviet structure | Local soviets were initially elected but increasingly came under Bolshevik party control |
| Press controls | Opposition newspapers were closed within days of the revolution |
The Constituent Assembly election results were a blow to the Bolsheviks:
| Party | Seats |
|---|---|
| Socialist Revolutionaries | 370 |
| Bolsheviks | 175 |
| Left SRs | 40 |
| Kadets | 17 |
| Mensheviks | 16 |
| Others | 89 |
The Assembly met for a single day on 5 January 1918. When it refused to ratify Bolshevik decrees, it was dissolved by armed sailors on Lenin's orders. Lenin justified the closure by arguing that the Assembly represented 'bourgeois democracy', which was inferior to 'soviet democracy' — the direct rule of workers through their councils.
The historian Orlando Figes describes the dissolution as 'the point of no return' — the moment when the Bolsheviks openly chose dictatorship over the democracy they had promised. It is a pivotal piece of evidence in the 'ideology versus circumstance' debate: there was no civil-war emergency in January 1918 to compel it, so the closure looks like a deliberate ideological choice to subordinate parliamentary democracy to the party's claim to embody the proletariat.
Lenin insisted on peace with Germany at any price, arguing that the revolution's survival depended on ending the war. The debate was fierce:
| Position | Advocates |
|---|---|
| Accept German terms | Lenin — 'We must sign. We must buy time.' |
| Revolutionary war | Bukharin and the Left Communists — continue fighting to spread revolution |
| 'Neither war nor peace' | Trotsky — refuse to sign but also refuse to fight (this strategy failed when Germany resumed its advance) |
The treaty was extraordinarily harsh:
The Left SRs withdrew from the government in protest, and the treaty nearly split the Bolshevik party itself.
The historian Evan Mawdsley notes that Brest-Litovsk 'saved the revolution but at a terrible price' — it demonstrated Lenin's ruthless pragmatism and his willingness to sacrifice almost anything for the survival of Bolshevik power. The wider significance is threefold. First, it kept the promise of peace on which October had partly rested, buying the breathing-space ('peredyshka') Lenin judged essential. Second, it was a gamble on the imminence of world revolution: Lenin bet that the German Empire would itself soon collapse and the treaty become a dead letter — a bet that, remarkably, paid off when Germany was defeated in November 1918 and the Soviet government promptly annulled the treaty. Third, the manner of the decision — Lenin forcing a deeply unpopular line through a divided Central Committee against Bukharin's Left Communists and Trotsky's 'neither war nor peace' formula — reinforced the lesson of October: that the party would do what its leader judged necessary, the dissenters notwithstanding. The Left SRs' departure also removed the last non-Bolshevik element from the government, a further step toward the one-party state.
| Force | Composition | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reds | Bolsheviks; Red Army (created by Trotsky from January 1918) | Held the centre; unified command; clear ideology; ruthless discipline | Initially poorly trained and equipped |
| Whites | Monarchists, liberals, moderate socialists, Cossacks, national minorities | Military experience; foreign support | Geographically scattered; no unified command; no common political programme; often brutal to civilians |
| Greens | Peasant armies (notably Makhno's anarchist forces in Ukraine) | Local knowledge; guerrilla tactics | Localised; no national strategy |
| Foreign intervention | British, French, American, Japanese, and others | Military capability | Half-hearted; war-weary populations at home; unclear objectives |
Trotsky's creation of the Red Army was one of the most remarkable military achievements of the twentieth century:
| Factor | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Geography | The Reds held the centre of Russia, including Moscow, Petrograd, and the main railway network, allowing rapid movement of troops |
| Unity | The Reds had a single command structure and a clear ideology; the Whites were fatally divided |
| White weaknesses | White generals (Denikin, Kolchak, Yudenich, Wrangel) could not coordinate their attacks and alienated potential supporters through brutality and forced conscription |
| Foreign intervention failed | Allied forces were small, war-weary, and lacked political support at home for a sustained campaign |
| Propaganda | The Reds effectively portrayed the Whites as agents of foreign imperialism and the old regime |
| War Communism | However brutal, War Communism ensured the Red Army was fed and supplied |
The deepest analytical point about the Red victory is that geography and unity were force-multipliers for everything else. Holding the central industrial and railway core meant the Reds fought on interior lines: they could shift troops by rail from one threatened front to another faster than the Whites, scattered around the vast periphery, could ever coordinate. The Whites' fatal political failure compounded this — because their generals were associated with the landlords and the old order, the peasantry (who feared a White victory would reverse the land seizures of 1917) ultimately preferred the Reds as the lesser evil, for all the hatred bred by requisitioning. The Bolsheviks also enjoyed the priceless advantage of fighting for something definite: a single ideology and a single leadership, against a White coalition united only by anti-Bolshevism and forever quarrelling over whether it stood for monarchy, republic or military rule. None of this made Red victory automatic — in 1919 the regime's survival genuinely hung in the balance as Denikin drove north and Yudenich approached Petrograd — but it explains why, once the immediate crises were survived, the structural advantages told.
| Policy | Detail |
|---|---|
| Grain requisitioning | Armed detachments (prodrazvyorstka) seized grain from peasants; resistance was met with violence |
| Nationalisation | All enterprises with more than 10 workers were nationalised by November 1920 |
| Abolition of money | The regime attempted to replace monetary exchange with direct allocation |
| Labour conscription | Workers were directed to where they were needed; movement was restricted |
| Ban on private trade | All private commerce was illegal (though a vast black market flourished) |
| Rationing | Food was distributed on a class basis — workers received more than 'former people' (nobles, bourgeoisie, clergy) |
This is an important historiographical debate:
The Red Terror was intensified after the attempted assassination of Lenin on 30 August 1918 (he was shot by SR Fanny Kaplan) and the murder of Petrograd Cheka chief Uritsky.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Cheka executions | Estimates range from 100,000 to 200,000 during the Civil War period |
| Hostage-taking | 'Bourgeois' hostages were seized and shot in reprisal for anti-Bolshevik actions |
| Class-based persecution | Former nobles, bourgeoisie, clergy, and 'kulaks' were targeted as class enemies |
| Concentration camps | Established from 1918 for political opponents |
| Romanov execution | The former Tsar and his family were executed at Yekaterinburg on 17 July 1918 |
The historian Orlando Figes argues that the Red Terror was 'not simply a response to the White threat' but reflected 'a fundamental aspect of Bolshevik ideology — the conviction that class enemies must be physically eliminated'. Lenin himself stated: 'We must encourage the energy and mass character of the terror.'
Exam Tip: The relationship between civil war and terror is crucial. Consider whether Bolshevik violence was caused by the extreme circumstances of civil war or whether it was inherent in Bolshevik ideology. The strongest answers will argue that both factors operated: the civil war provided the context and justification, but the ideological commitment to class warfare and 'dictatorship of the proletariat' predisposed the Bolsheviks toward violence.
The Kronstadt Rebellion represented the most significant challenge to Bolshevik authority from within the revolutionary camp.
The sailors — once hailed as 'the pride and glory of the revolution' — demanded:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.