You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Elizabethan England was a society of profound inequality, rapid demographic change, and — beneath an ideology of fixed hierarchy — surprising dynamism. The social order was rigid in theory and increasingly fluid in practice, as overseas trade, the spread of education, and above all the redistribution of monastic and crown land created new openings for social mobility. The same decades that produced Shakespeare and the Faerie Queene also produced mass vagrancy, a sixfold inflation, and the harvest crisis of the mid-1590s, when men and women starved in the streets of northern towns. Any serious account of the period must hold these two faces together: the "golden age" of cultural achievement and the grinding reality of poverty for perhaps a third of the population.
This lesson examines the structure of Elizabethan society, the great problem of poverty and vagrancy and the state's response in the Poor Laws, the expansion of trade and exploration, the world of education and culture, and the position of women. The central historical debates concern change versus continuity: was Elizabethan society a static, deferential hierarchy, or a society being transformed by population growth, the rise of the gentry, urbanisation, and rising literacy? And how should we read the Poor Laws of 1598–1601 — as evidence of a new, "modern" recognition of poverty as a structural problem requiring state action (the view associated with Keith Wrightson and Paul Slack), or merely as an apparatus of social control aimed at disciplining the labouring poor?
Key Question: Was Elizabethan England a stable, deferential, divinely-ordered hierarchy, or a society undergoing profound transformation through demographic pressure, inflation, social mobility, and cultural change — and what does the response to poverty reveal about the relationship between the propertied and the poor?
This lesson belongs to Paper 1 (Breadth), Option 1C, in Part Two ("England: turmoil and triumph, 1547–1603"). Society, economy, poverty, and culture are core Elizabethan content and frequently examined as a breadth essay.
Elizabethan society was understood through a rigidly hierarchical ideology, underpinned by the doctrine of the Great Chain of Being — the belief that God had ordained a fixed order of all creation, from the monarch at the summit to the meanest labourer at the base, and that to disturb one's appointed "degree" was to defy God and invite chaos. This was the official theory of society, endlessly reaffirmed in sermons (the Homily on Obedience) and in literature. The reality, as the table below suggests, was a good deal more fluid.
graph TD
A["Monarch"] --> B["Nobility<br/>(Dukes, Earls, Barons)"]
B --> C["Gentry<br/>(Knights, Esquires, Gentlemen)"]
C --> D["Yeomen<br/>(Prosperous farmers)"]
D --> E["Husbandmen<br/>(Small-scale farmers)"]
E --> F["Labourers and Servants"]
F --> G["Vagrants and Beggars"]
| Social Group | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Nobility | Around 50–60 peers; vast estates; served as Lord Lieutenants and Privy Councillors; their numbers held roughly steady but their independent military power declined sharply under the Tudors as private retinues were suppressed |
| Gentry | The fastest-growing and most dynamic group; knights, esquires, and gentlemen who held land and ran the localities as JPs, MPs, and sheriffs; the chief beneficiaries of monastic land sales; increasingly university-educated and self-consciously a governing class |
| Yeomen | Substantial freehold or leasehold farmers; the most prosperous profited from rising food prices and could aspire to gentility, blurring the line above them |
| Husbandmen | Small tenant farmers, vulnerable to enclosure, rising rents and entry fines, and harvest failure |
| Labourers and servants | Worked for wages on others' land or in crafts; their real wages fell across the century as prices outran pay — the great losers of the Tudor economy |
| Vagrants | The landless, masterless, mobile poor, searching for work or charity; feared as a threat to order and criminalised by savage vagrancy laws |
Key Definition: The Great Chain of Being was the belief that all creation was arranged in a divinely-ordained hierarchy in which every person had a fixed "degree." It served to justify inequality and to command political and social obedience. The concept is historically revealing precisely because of the gap between its claim of fixity and the reality of substantial mobility — upward (rising yeomen and gentry) and downward (impoverished husbandmen and labourers) — which the ideology was, in part, an anxious attempt to deny.
The defining economic fact of the period was population growth outpacing the economy. This single pressure underlies inflation, falling real wages, land hunger, and mass poverty.
This is the essential causation point for the whole lesson: poverty was not, fundamentally, a matter of idleness or vice (as contemporary moralists often claimed) but the structural product of demographic and monetary forces — a point modern historians stress and which, in muted form, the 1601 Poor Law itself half-recognised.
Poverty was the most pressing social problem of the age. The historian A.L. Beier estimated that perhaps a third of the population lived at or below subsistence at any time, with many more only one bad harvest away from destitution.
| Cause | Detail |
|---|---|
| Population growth | The fundamental driver: more people than the economy could employ or feed (2.3m → 4.1m, 1525–1601) |
| Inflation and falling real wages | The price revolution eroded the living standards of all who lived by wages |
| Enclosure | The conversion of arable and common land to (more profitable) pasture for sheep displaced tenants and removed the common grazing and gleaning rights on which the poor depended |
| Harvest failure | A run of disastrous harvests, especially 1594–1597, sent grain prices soaring and produced genuine famine conditions and even starvation in the north |
| Dissolution of the monasteries | Removed an important traditional source of charity, hospitality, and care for the indigent |
| Demobilised soldiers | Men discharged from the wars in the Netherlands, France, and Ireland swelled the ranks of the masterless and mobile poor |
Contemporaries drew a sharp moral distinction between the "impotent" or "deserving" poor (the aged, sick, disabled, orphaned — poor through no fault of their own) and the "sturdy beggars" or "undeserving" poor (the able-bodied who, it was assumed, could work but would not). This distinction, however unjust to the genuinely unemployed, structured all Tudor poor policy.
The response to poverty evolved across the reign from punishment toward a mixture of relief and discipline, culminating in the great codifying statutes of 1598 and 1601.
| Legislation | Date | Key Provisions |
|---|---|---|
| Statute of Artificers | 1563 | Regulated the labour market: compulsory seven-year apprenticeships, JP-fixed wages, and restrictions on labour mobility — an attempt to stabilise employment and wages |
| Vagabonds Act | 1572 | Authorised harsh punishment of "sturdy beggars" (whipping, boring through the ear) but also introduced, for the first time, a compulsory local poor rate to relieve the impotent — the decisive shift from voluntary charity to taxation |
| Poor Relief Act | 1576 | Required towns to provide raw materials (a "stock") so the able-bodied poor could be set to work, and established houses of correction for the idle |
| Act for the Relief of the Poor | 1598 & 1601 | The codifying statutes (the "Old Poor Law"): each parish levied a compulsory poor rate; unpaid Overseers of the Poor administered it; the impotent poor received relief; the able-bodied were set to work; idle "sturdy beggars" were punished; pauper children were apprenticed |
Exam Tip: The 1601 Poor Law is significant for two reasons. First, change: it established the principle that poor relief was a public, compulsory, tax-funded responsibility administered by local government — a system that endured, remarkably, until 1834. Second, the interpretive debate: Keith Wrightson and Paul Slack see in it a genuine shift toward recognising poverty as a structural problem warranting state action; sceptics read it primarily as social control — an apparatus to discipline and immobilise the labouring poor and suppress the threat of vagrancy. The strongest answers recognise the law did both: it relieved and it disciplined, embodying the era's double vision of the poor as objects of duty and of fear.
The Elizabethan economy, though overwhelmingly agrarian, saw a significant diversification and expansion of overseas trade and the first stirrings of the maritime enterprise that would later build an empire — partly in response to the disruption of the old cloth trade.
| Development | Detail |
|---|---|
| The cloth trade | Still England's dominant export, long funnelled through Antwerp; but the disruption of Antwerp by the Dutch Revolt forced English merchants to seek new markets, spurring the chartered companies below |
| Merchant Adventurers | The great regulated company controlling the cloth export trade, which relocated its mart from Antwerp as the Netherlands descended into war |
| Muscovy Company (1555) | Opened trade with Russia via the perilous White Sea route — a search for new outlets beyond a troubled Europe |
| Levant Company (1581) | Traded with the Ottoman Empire, importing silks, currants, and spices |
| East India Company (1600) | Chartered to trade with Asia; the seed of a vast future imperial enterprise |
| Privateering | State-licensed raiding of Spanish shipping; men like Drake and Hawkins fused patriotism, Protestantism, and private profit, and helped finance the war with Spain |
| Drake's circumnavigation (1577–1580) | The first English voyage around the globe; a feat of navigation, a propaganda triumph, and a source of vast Spanish plunder for the queen and investors |
| Colonisation attempts | Sir Walter Raleigh's Roanoke ventures (Virginia, 1580s) failed — the "Lost Colony" vanished — but pioneered the idea of English settlement in the New World |
The significance of this expansion should be kept in proportion: it was the beginning of a process, not its culmination. England in 1603 remained a second-rank commercial and naval power beside Spain and the emerging Dutch Republic, and the bulk of national wealth still came from the land.
A striking feature of the period was the expansion of education and the spread of literacy, especially among the gentry and the "middling sort" — a genuine agent of social change.
| Level | Detail |
|---|---|
| Petty schools | Taught basic reading (and some writing and numeracy) to young children, often by the parish clergy or by women ("dame schools") |
| Grammar schools | Taught Latin, rhetoric, and the classics; many newly founded or re-endowed (often from former chantry funds) in the sixteenth century; the ladder by which able boys of the middling sort could rise |
| Universities | Oxford and Cambridge, now increasingly attended by the gentry seeking polish and connections, not only by future clergy; a university education became a marker of gentility |
| Inns of Court | The London law colleges — the "third university" — where young gentlemen acquired law, manners, and connections |
| Female education | Largely confined to the household and domestic accomplishments; a few elite women (Elizabeth herself, the Cooke sisters) were superbly educated, but formal schooling was effectively closed to girls |
Key Definition: Humanism was the Renaissance intellectual movement that prized the study of classical Greek and Latin texts, eloquence, and active civic virtue. Humanist ideals reshaped Elizabethan grammar-school and university education, producing a governing class that valued learning, rhetoric, and service — and helped turn the gentry into the literate administrators who ran Tudor local government.
The late Elizabethan period is justly called a "golden age" of English culture, above all in drama and poetry — a flowering linked to rising literacy, court and aristocratic patronage, national confidence after the Armada, and the new commercial theatres.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.