The European Convention on Human Rights

Introduction

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is one of the most important human rights instruments in the world. Drafted in 1950 and entering into force in 1953, it was the first international treaty to provide enforceable protection for many of the rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. For AQA A-Level Law, a thorough understanding of the ECHR's structure, its classification of rights, and the role of the European Court of Human Rights is essential.

The UK played a leading role in drafting the ECHR. Sir David Maxwell Fyfe, a British lawyer who had served as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, was instrumental in its creation. The UK was among the first states to ratify the Convention in 1951, though it did not incorporate it into domestic law until the Human Rights Act 1998.

---

The Council of Europe

The ECHR must be understood in its institutional context. It was created by the Council of Europe, an international organisation established in 1949 by the Treaty of London. Key points:

• The Council of Europe is not the same as the European Union (EU) or the European Council
• It currently has 46 member states (Russia was expelled in 2022 following its invasion of Ukraine)
• Its stated aim is to uphold human rights, democracy, and the rule of law
• The Council of Europe is headquartered in Strasbourg, France
• It established the European Court of Human Rights to enforce the ECHR

Body	Members	Purpose	Relationship to ECHR
Council of Europe	46 states	Human rights, democracy, rule of law	Created the ECHR
European Union	27 states	Economic and political integration	Separate body; EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is distinct
European Council	EU heads of state	EU policy direction	No direct role in ECHR

---

Structure of the Convention

The ECHR is divided into three main sections:

Section I: Rights and Freedoms (Articles 2-18)

This section sets out the substantive rights protected by the Convention. The main rights include:

• Article 2: Right to life
• Article 3: Prohibition of torture
• Article 4: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour
• Article 5: Right to liberty and security
• Article 6: Right to a fair trial
• Article 7: No punishment without law
• Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life
• Article 9: Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion
• Article 10: Freedom of expression
• Article 11: Freedom of assembly and association
• Article 12: Right to marry
• Article 13: Right to an effective remedy
• Article 14: Prohibition of discrimination (in the enjoyment of Convention rights)

Section II: The European Court of Human Rights (Articles 19-51)

This section establishes the European Court of Human Rights and sets out its composition, jurisdiction, and procedures.

Section III: Miscellaneous Provisions (Articles 52-59)

This section contains procedural and administrative provisions, including the process for ratification, denunciation, and territorial application.

---

Classification of Convention Rights

One of the most important aspects of the ECHR for A-Level Law is understanding that Convention rights are classified into different categories, each with different levels of protection.

Absolute Rights

Absolute rights cannot be limited, restricted, or derogated from under any circumstances. There are no exceptions, even in times of war or public emergency. The state must never violate these rights.

• Article 2 (right to life) — although this contains limited exceptions (see below), the right itself is regarded as near-absolute
• Article 3 (prohibition of torture) — truly absolute: no exceptions, no derogation, no balancing exercise
• Article 4(1) (prohibition of slavery) — truly absolute

The absolute nature of Article 3 has been confirmed in numerous cases. In Chahal v UK [1996], the ECtHR held that the UK could not deport a suspected terrorist to India where there was a real risk of torture, regardless of the threat the individual posed to national security. The Court stated that "the prohibition against ill-treatment contained in Article 3 is equally absolute in expulsion cases."

Limited Rights

Limited rights can be restricted only in the specific circumstances set out in the Article itself. The state cannot add further limitations beyond those expressly stated in the Convention.

• Article 2 (right to life): Article 2(2) permits the use of lethal force when it is "absolutely necessary" for:

  • (a) Defence of any person from unlawful violence
  • (b) Making a lawful arrest or preventing the escape of a lawfully detained person
  • (c) Lawful action to quell a riot or insurrection

• Article 5 (right to liberty): Article 5(1) permits deprivation of liberty only in the following exhaustive circumstances:

  • (a) Lawful detention after conviction by a competent court
  • (b) Lawful arrest or detention for non-compliance with a court order
  • (c) Lawful arrest on reasonable suspicion of an offence
  • (d) Detention of a minor for educational supervision
  • (e) Lawful detention of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics, drug addicts, or vagrants
  • (f) Lawful arrest or detention to prevent unauthorised entry into the country, or for deportation/extradition

The exhaustive nature of these lists is crucial. In Winterwerp v Netherlands [1979], the ECtHR confirmed that the grounds for detention in Article 5(1) must be strictly interpreted.

Qualified Rights

Qualified rights can be limited by the state, but only if the limitation meets strict conditions. The state must demonstrate that any restriction is:

1. Prescribed by law (or "in accordance with the law") — the restriction must have a legal basis that is accessible and foreseeable
2. In pursuit of a legitimate aim — the aims are listed in the relevant Article (e.g., national security, public safety, prevention of crime)
3. Necessary in a democratic society — the restriction must be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued

The qualified rights are:

• Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life (qualified by Art 8(2))
• Article 9: Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion (qualified by Art 9(2))
• Article 10: Freedom of expression (qualified by Art 10(2))
• Article 11: Freedom of assembly and association (qualified by Art 11(2))

graph TD
    A["Convention Rights"] --> B["Absolute Rights"]
    A --> C["Limited Rights"]
    A --> D["Qualified Rights"]
    B --> B1["Art 3: Prohibition of Torture"]
    B --> B2["Art 4(1): Prohibition of Slavery"]
    B --> B3["No exceptions,<br/>no derogation"]
    C --> C1["Art 2: Right to Life"]
    C --> C2["Art 5: Right to Liberty"]
    C --> C3["Exceptions exhaustively<br/>listed in the Article"]
    D --> D1["Art 8: Private & Family Life"]
    D --> D2["Art 9: Religion"]
    D --> D3["Art 10: Expression"]
    D --> D4["Art 11: Assembly"]
    D --> D5["Must be: prescribed by law,<br/>legitimate aim,<br/>necessary in democratic society"]
    style B fill:#c0392b,color:#fff
    style C fill:#e67e22,color:#fff
    style D fill:#2980b9,color:#fff

The Three-Stage Test for Qualified Rights

When a state restricts a qualified right, the restriction must satisfy all three stages of the following test:

Stage	Question	Key Principle
1. Prescribed by law	Is there a legal basis for the restriction?	The law must be accessible and foreseeable — Sunday Times v UK [1979]
2. Legitimate aim	Does the restriction pursue one of the listed aims?	Aims vary by Article (e.g., national security, public safety, rights of others)
3. Necessary in a democratic society	Is the restriction proportionate?	Must correspond to a "pressing social need" and be proportionate to the aim — Handyside v UK [1976]

---

Derogable vs Non-Derogable Rights

Derogation under Article 15

Article 15 of the ECHR permits states to derogate (temporarily set aside) certain Convention rights "in time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation." However, this power is subject to strict conditions:

• The emergency must be genuine and must threaten "the life of the nation"
• The measures taken must be "strictly required by the exigencies of the situation"
• The measures must not be inconsistent with the state's other obligations under international law
• The state must inform the Secretary General of the Council of Europe