You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Newspapers are the oldest mass-media form on the AQA specification and, paradoxically, one of the most urgently contemporary. They have faced existential disruption from the internet for two decades; they remain politically and culturally powerful; and they have pivoted (with varying success) to digital subscription and advertising models. The CSPs typically pair a tabloid and a broadsheet — or a mid-market tabloid and a broadsheet — allowing comparative analysis of form, politics, audience, and industrial strategy.
This lesson covers the distinction between tabloid and broadsheet conventions, mode of address, political alignment, news values (Galtung & Ruge), the decline of print circulation, and the digital pivot.
The tabloid/broadsheet distinction is a British journalistic convention. Originally it referred to physical page size (tabloid = half the size of a traditional broadsheet), but it has come to mean a cluster of editorial, visual, and linguistic choices.
| Feature | Tabloid | Broadsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | Bold, image-led | Text-led, structured |
| Headlines | Punchy, emotive | Descriptive, neutral |
| Language | Colloquial | Formal |
| Content mix | Celebrity/sport/human interest | Politics/analysis/culture |
| Political stance | Usually overt | Often implicit |
| Audience social grade | C1–E | AB |
Some UK newspapers occupy a mid-market position — tabloid format but with more serious content than a red-top. They typically target an older, more socially conservative audience and have been among the most politically influential titles in modern British history.
Mode of address is how a text speaks to its reader. Newspapers construct implied readers through:
A close study of mode of address often reveals the political and class assumptions a paper makes about its audience.
British national newspapers are almost all aligned politically. They are explicit about their alignment at election time, when they may formally endorse a party. Between elections, alignment shows in:
graph LR
A[UK Press] --> B[Right-leaning tabloids/mid-market]
A --> C[Left-leaning tabloids]
A --> D[Right-leaning broadsheets]
A --> E[Centre-left broadsheets]
A --> F[Business-focused]
A central concept here is agenda-setting (McCombs and Shaw): the press may not tell us what to think, but it is very successful at telling us what to think about. By selecting which stories to cover and how prominently, newspapers shape the terrain of public debate.
Johan Galtung and Mari Holmboe Ruge published their foundational study of news values in 1965. They asked: why does one event become "news" while another, equally significant event, does not? Their answer identified a cluster of factors that make events newsworthy.
Galtung and Ruge = news values. This is one of the key theorist references you must get right.
graph TD
A[Event] --> B{Passes news values filter?}
B -->|Yes| C[Becomes news]
B -->|No| D[Ignored]
B --> E[Frequency]
B --> F[Threshold]
B --> G[Elite reference]
B --> H[Negativity]
B --> I[Personification]
Later theorists (Harcup and O'Neill, 2001 and 2017) have updated Galtung and Ruge's list for the digital age, adding values like:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.