You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Jean Piaget (1896–1980) is one of the most influential developmental psychologists. His theory proposes that children actively construct their understanding of the world through schemas, and that cognitive development proceeds through four universal stages. This lesson covers Piaget's key concepts, the four stages, research evidence, and critical evaluation.
Key Definition: A schema is a mental framework or "building block" of knowledge that helps an individual organise and interpret information. Schemas develop and become more complex through experience.
This lesson addresses the following points from the AQA A-Level Psychology (7182) specification, Paper 3, Section B: Cognition and Development:
| Specification point | Coverage in this lesson |
|---|---|
| Piaget's theory of cognitive development: schemas, assimilation, accommodation, equilibration | Innate schemas; the assimilation/accommodation distinction; the disequilibrium → equilibrium cycle |
| The stages of intellectual development: sensorimotor, pre-operational, concrete operational, formal operational | Object permanence; egocentrism (three-mountains task); conservation; class inclusion; concrete vs formal operations; the pendulum task |
| Research challenging Piaget | Hughes' policeman-doll study (1975); McGarrigle & Donaldson's "naughty teddy" (1974); Baillargeon's violation-of-expectation work |
These points are assessed through short-answer AO1 questions (describe a stage; outline assimilation and accommodation), AO2 application where a child-behaviour scenario is supplied, and 16-mark essays that demand balanced AO1 description and AO3 evaluation — most often around whether Piaget underestimated children's abilities and overstated individual discovery relative to Vygotsky.
Piaget argued that children are born with a small number of innate schemas (reflexes such as sucking, grasping). Through interaction with the environment, these simple schemas become elaborated and new schemas are formed. Piaget distinguished increasingly sophisticated types: early behavioural (action) schemas (organised patterns of physical action, such as the grasping schema); later symbolic schemas (internal representations, allowing pretend play and language); and eventually operational schemas (internalised, reversible mental operations, such as the logic underlying conservation). The progressive abstraction of schemas — from action, to symbol, to operation — broadly tracks the four stages, which is why the schema is the single most important unit of Piaget's theory: development is, in essence, the construction and reorganisation of ever more powerful schemas.
Children adapt their schemas through two complementary processes:
| Process | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Assimilation | Incorporating new information into an existing schema without changing the schema | A child who knows the schema "dog" (four legs, fur, tail) sees a new dog breed and assimilates it into the "dog" schema |
| Accommodation | Modifying an existing schema (or creating a new one) to fit new information that does not match | The same child sees a cat for the first time. It has four legs and fur, but is clearly not a dog. The child creates a new "cat" schema — this is accommodation |
Key Definition: Equilibration is the driving force of cognitive development. It is the process of moving from a state of cognitive disequilibrium (when new information does not fit existing schemas) to equilibrium (when schemas adequately explain the world).
When a child encounters something that challenges their existing schemas, they experience disequilibrium — a state of cognitive discomfort. To restore equilibrium, the child must accommodate their schemas. This cycle of disequilibrium → accommodation → equilibrium drives development forward.
graph TD
A["Existing schema<br/>(equilibrium)"] --> B["New experience encountered"]
B --> C{"Does it fit the<br/>existing schema?"}
C -->|"Yes"| D["Assimilation<br/>(absorb into schema)"]
D --> A
C -->|"No"| E["Disequilibrium<br/>(cognitive discomfort)"]
E --> F["Accommodation<br/>(modify / create schema)"]
F --> G["New equilibrium<br/>(development has occurred)"]
This is the heart of Piaget's constructivism: knowledge is not poured into the child by adults but actively built by the child as they repeatedly resolve disequilibrium. It explains why Piaget placed so much emphasis on first-hand exploration — only by encountering the unexpected does the child have anything to accommodate to.
Piaget proposed that all children pass through four stages in the same order, with each stage characterised by qualitatively different ways of thinking:
graph LR
A["Sensorimotor<br/>(0–2 years)"] --> B["Preoperational<br/>(2–7 years)"]
B --> C["Concrete Operational<br/>(7–11 years)"]
C --> D["Formal Operational<br/>(11+ years)"]
The infant learns about the world through sensory experiences and motor actions (touching, looking, sucking, grasping).
Key development: Object permanence
Key Definition: Object permanence is the understanding that objects continue to exist even when they cannot be seen. Piaget argued that infants under approximately 8 months lack object permanence — when an object is hidden, they behave as if it no longer exists.
Piaget's evidence: Piaget observed that infants under about 8 months did not search for a toy that was hidden under a blanket, even if they had been reaching for it moments earlier. After 8 months, infants began to search for hidden objects, indicating the emergence of object permanence.
Within the sensorimotor stage, Piaget described a progression from primary circular reactions (the infant repeats pleasurable bodily actions, e.g. thumb-sucking), through secondary circular reactions (repeating actions that produce interesting effects in the world, e.g. shaking a rattle), to the coordination of secondary schemas — the point at which the infant can combine two schemas to achieve a goal (e.g. moving a cushion in order to grasp a toy behind it). This coordination of means and ends is closely tied to the emergence of object permanence, because the infant must represent the hidden goal-object in order to act towards it. The detail matters because it shows Piaget did not treat the stage as a single undifferentiated block but as an ordered sequence of increasingly intentional, schema-driven action.
A-not-B error: Even after achieving object permanence, infants around 8–12 months make a characteristic error. If an object is hidden at location A several times, then moved to location B while the infant watches, the infant will still search at location A. Piaget interpreted this as evidence that the infant's schema for the object is tied to the action of reaching to A.
Towards the end of the stage, two further achievements signal the transition out of pure sensorimotor functioning. The infant develops the capacity for mental representation — holding an image of an absent object in mind — which makes possible deferred imitation, the ability to reproduce a behaviour seen earlier (for example, copying an action a parent performed the previous day). Deferred imitation is significant because it requires the child to have stored a representation and retrieved it later, demonstrating that thought is becoming detached from immediate action. This representational capacity is the foundation on which the symbolic thinking of the next stage is built.
The child can use symbolic thought (language, pretend play, drawing) but has several cognitive limitations. Piaget called it "pre-operational" because the child cannot yet perform mental operations — internally reversible, logical transformations. Three interlocking limitations define the stage: egocentrism, centration (with its consequence, irreversibility), and animism.
Animism is the tendency to attribute life, feelings, and intentions to inanimate objects — a child may insist that the sun "wants" to go to bed, or apologise to a table they have bumped into. For Piaget this reflects the pre-operational child's difficulty distinguishing the psychological from the physical, and it gradually fades as the child's schemas for living and non-living things become differentiated.
The stage's better-known limitations are:
Egocentrism: The inability to see the world from another person's perspective.
Piaget's evidence — The Three Mountains Task:
Conservation: The understanding that quantity remains the same despite changes in appearance.
Piaget's conservation experiments:
Preoperational children fail conservation tasks for two linked reasons. First, centration: they focus on a single, perceptually salient dimension (the height of the liquid, the length of the row) and ignore the compensating change in another dimension (the width of the glass). Second, irreversibility: they cannot mentally "run the transformation backwards" to recognise that the liquid could be poured back into the original glass and would be unchanged. Conservation is therefore achieved only when the child can decentre (coordinate two dimensions at once) and reverse operations — abilities that arrive with the concrete operational stage.
Exam Tip: When describing conservation tasks, always specify the type (number, liquid, mass) and explain that the child focuses on appearance (centration) and cannot mentally reverse the change (irreversibility). Naming both mechanisms demonstrates precise AO1 knowledge.
Children can now perform logical operations on concrete (real, physical) objects and situations:
Class inclusion in detail. Piaget tested class inclusion by showing children, for example, a bunch of flowers containing seven roses and three tulips, and asking "Are there more roses or more flowers?" Pre-operational children typically answer "more roses", because they cannot simultaneously consider the subclass (roses) and the superordinate class (flowers) — they centrate on the more numerous subclass. Only at the concrete operational stage can the child hold the part and the whole in mind at once and answer correctly. Class inclusion is therefore a sensitive marker of the shift from pre-operational to concrete operational thought.
Limitation: Children at this stage can only reason about concrete (tangible, real) objects and situations. They struggle with abstract or hypothetical reasoning.
Adolescents develop the ability to think abstractly, hypothetically, and systematically:
The shift from concrete to formal operations is therefore not merely "more knowledge" but a qualitative change in the form of reasoning — from logic applied to tangible objects to logic applied to abstract propositions and possibilities.
Martin Hughes challenged Piaget's claim about egocentrism using a task that made human sense to children:
Conclusion: Piaget underestimated children's abilities. When the task is meaningful and contextualised (hiding from a policeman), children show perspective-taking ability much earlier than Piaget claimed. The Three Mountains Task may have been too abstract and unfamiliar.
Renée Baillargeon used the violation of expectation (VoE) paradigm to test object permanence in infants as young as 3.5 months:
Exam Tip: Baillargeon's VoE research is crucial for evaluating Piaget. It suggests that infants have innate physical reasoning abilities, directly contradicting Piaget's constructivist view that knowledge is built from experience.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.