You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Christianity is not only a set of beliefs about God; it is a way of life. But on what does a Christian's sense of right and wrong rest, and how is a moral decision actually reached? The AQA specification frames this topic around the sources of moral authority — the Bible, the Church, reason and conscience — and the central place of agape love and the command to love, together with the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments). It then asks how Christian ethics relates to two influential ethical systems, natural law and situation ethics, and presses the pivotal evaluative question: how far should Christians follow fixed moral rules, and how far should they be guided by love? This lesson sets out the framework precisely and weighs the rules-versus-love debate.
Christians characteristically appeal to four sources when deciding how to act. The differences between Christians often come down to how these are ranked and what happens when they conflict.
| Source | What it contributes | A limitation |
|---|---|---|
| The Bible | Commands, narratives and principles taken as God's revealed will (the Decalogue, the Sermon on the Mount, the law of love) | Requires interpretation; ancient commands may be culturally bound; texts can appear to conflict |
| The Church | The accumulated moral wisdom and teaching authority of the community (for Catholics, the Magisterium; for others, denominational teaching and tradition) | Can entrench past error and resist reform; whose Church teaching binds? |
| Reason | The God-given capacity to discern the moral order, central to natural law | Barth's worry that fallen reason misleads; reason alone may not motivate |
| Conscience | The inner moral judgement, often regarded as the voice of God within | Can be mistaken or self-serving; needs forming |
A Roman Catholic typically holds these in a relatively integrated system: Scripture interpreted by the Church, undergirded by reason through natural law, with conscience as the final personal application. A Reformed Protestant tends to give Scripture clear primacy, treating Church teaching and reason as subordinate. The point for the exam is that "Christian ethics" is not monolithic; it is a family of approaches differing over the weighting of these four sources.
The Bible is the first and, for most Christians, the foundational source — but using it ethically is more complex than "just following the Bible." Several difficulties recur. The text spans many genres (law, narrative, prophecy, poetry, letter), each demanding a different reading. Many commands are bound to their ancient cultural context (rules about slavery, head-coverings, diet). Some texts appear to conflict: the Old Testament permits polygamy and prescribes capital punishment for offences the New Testament treats with mercy. And, as noted, Christians disagree about which categories of Old Testament law still bind. As a result, a conservative who reads Scripture as directly and timelessly authoritative may reach quite different conclusions from a liberal who reads it as a culturally conditioned witness needing reinterpretation. The honest point is that Scripture supplies the indispensable raw material of Christian ethics, but it is always read, and the reading draws in the other three sources.
Reason is, for the natural-law tradition, the faculty by which we discern the moral order God has built into creation; this is examined in detail below. Conscience is the inner moral judgement, and Christians have understood it in markedly different ways. Aquinas treated it not as a mysterious voice but as reason making moral judgements — synderesis (the innate disposition to do good and avoid evil) applied through conscientia (working out the right action in the particular case); a conscience can err through faulty reasoning, yet one is still bound to follow it sincerely. Joseph Butler (1692–1752) held conscience to be the God-given supreme authority within human nature, with the right to rule even when it lacks the power. John Henry Newman called it "the aboriginal Vicar of Christ," insisting one must follow a sincere conscience even against external authority. By sharp contrast, the atheist Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) explained conscience naturalistically as the super-ego — the internalised voice of parents and society, not the voice of God at all. The believer can grant Freud's point that conscience is partly formed by upbringing while denying that this exhausts it; but the disagreement marks a real challenge to treating conscience as a direct line to God.
The Church functions as a source of moral authority by carrying and applying the community's accumulated moral wisdom. For Roman Catholics this is most formal: the Magisterium issues authoritative moral teaching (for example, the natural-law arguments of encyclicals on the sanctity of life), and a Catholic is bound to take this seriously even while forming a personal conscience. For Protestants the Church's role is real but less centralised — expressed through denominational statements, synods, and the teaching of pastors and theologians, always (on the Reformed view) subordinate to Scripture. The strength of the Church as a source is that it guards against private eccentricity and provides continuity and corporate discernment; the weakness, critics urge, is that ecclesial teaching has sometimes defended positions later judged wrong, so that an over-deference to Church authority can entrench error and stifle legitimate moral development. Once again the four sources must be held in balance: the Church interprets Scripture, reason tests the Church's arguments, and conscience finally applies them.
If there is a single organising principle of Christian ethics, it is love.
Key term: Agape is the New Testament Greek word for self-giving, unconditional love — distinguished from eros (desire), philia (friendship) and storge (familial affection). Agape is the love God has for humanity and that Christians are commanded to extend even to enemies. It is a settled orientation of the will toward the good of the other, not merely a feeling.
A crucial feature of agape, much emphasised by the Anglican theologian Joseph Fletcher and by writers such as C. S. Lewis (in The Four Loves), is that it is primarily a matter of the will rather than the emotions. One cannot be commanded to feel affection on demand, but one can be commanded to will and seek the good of another, even an enemy one does not like. This is what makes the command to "love your enemies" intelligible rather than absurd: it asks not for warm feelings toward the persecutor but for active goodwill and refusal of revenge. Agape is thus the most demanding and the most universal of the loves, owed to all, withheld from none.
The command to love is placed by Jesus at the very centre:
Crucially, Jesus illustrates neighbour-love with the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25–37), in which the "neighbour" turns out to be the despised foreigner who shows mercy — exploding any attempt to limit the scope of love to one's own group. Agape is thus universal in reach and practical in form: it is shown in what one does for the other, supremely modelled by Christ.
For many Christians, agape cannot remain private charity; it issues in a demand for justice, because to love one's neighbour is to want the conditions in which the neighbour can flourish. This conviction animates liberation theology, a movement arising in 1960s–70s Latin America.
Key term: Liberation theology interprets the faith from the standpoint of the poor and oppressed, holding that God has a preferential option for the poor and that genuine theology must issue in practical action (praxis) for justice.
Gustavo Gutiérrez (1928–2024), in A Theology of Liberation (1971), argued that sin is not only individual but structural — embedded in unjust economic and political systems — and that the Exodus, in which God liberates an enslaved people, is the pattern of God's saving action. The Kingdom of God is therefore not only a future hope but a summons to transform unjust structures now. Critics, including the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI) in 1984, warned against an uncritical borrowing of Marxist analysis and the reduction of the gospel to politics. The debate shows the breadth of "the command to love": whether it is satisfied by personal compassion or requires structural, even political, action is itself a live question in Christian ethics.
Alongside the law of love stands the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments, Exodus 20:1–17; also Deuteronomy 5), the foundational moral code Christianity inherits from Judaism.
Key term: The Decalogue ("ten words") is the set of commands given to Moses at Sinai. It is traditionally divided into two "tables": the first table concerns duties toward God (no other gods, no idols, not misusing God's name, keeping the Sabbath), and the second table concerns duties toward neighbour (honour parents; do not murder, commit adultery, steal, bear false witness, or covet).
The two-table structure maps neatly onto the two great commandments: love of God (first table) and love of neighbour (second table). This is why many Christians see no opposition between law and love — the commandments specify what love concretely requires, and Jesus himself, asked about eternal life, points to the commandments before deepening them. The Decalogue functions as a moral baseline: a set of near-absolute prohibitions (especially in the second table) that protect the most basic goods of human life and community. It is no accident that the commandments are framed largely as prohibitions ("you shall not..."): they mark out a protected space within which life together is possible, leaving wide room for positive moral creativity while ruling out the actions that would destroy trust, life and family. This combination of firm limits and open space is part of why the Decalogue has remained the bedrock of Christian moral teaching for two millennia.
Christians do, however, differ over the status of Old Testament law. A common (though contested) distinction separates moral law (held to be permanently binding, including the Decalogue's core), ceremonial law (sacrifices, dietary rules — regarded as fulfilled and set aside in Christ), and civil/judicial law (the specific statutes of ancient Israel). The Decalogue is normally placed in the enduring moral category, which is why it retains its authority for Christians while the food laws do not. The very need for such a distinction, however, shows that "following the Bible" already requires interpretive judgement about which commands still bind.
If the Decalogue is the moral baseline, the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7) is the charter of the deeper Christian ethic. Here Jesus does not abolish the commandments but intensifies them, moving from outward act to inward disposition: not only must one not murder, one must not nurse contemptuous anger; not only not commit adultery, but not look with lust; one must turn the other cheek and love one's enemies. The Sermon opens with the Beatitudes, which pronounce God's blessing on those the world overlooks.
| Beatitude | Sense |
|---|---|
| "Blessed are the poor in spirit" | Those who know their need of God |
| "Blessed are those who mourn" | The grieving, who will be comforted |
| "Blessed are the meek" | The humble, not the powerful, will inherit the earth |
| "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness" | Those who long for justice |
| "Blessed are the merciful" | The compassionate will receive compassion |
| "Blessed are the pure in heart" | Those of sincere motive will see God |
| "Blessed are the peacemakers" | Those who make peace are called children of God |
| "Blessed are those persecuted for righteousness' sake" | Suffering for justice marks the Kingdom |
The Beatitudes are not a new set of entry rules but a portrait of the character God blesses — humility, mercy, purity of heart, a hunger for righteousness and a commitment to peace. They show that Christian ethics is concerned not only with acts and rules but with the formation of character and the orientation of the heart, which is why some Christians find a natural ally in virtue ethics.
Key term: Virtue ethics, in the Christian appropriation of Aristotle, focuses less on rules or consequences and more on developing good character — the virtues. The Christian tradition adds the three theological virtues of faith, hope and love (1 Corinthians 13:13) to the four cardinal virtues (prudence, justice, fortitude/courage and temperance), holding that the goal of the moral life is to become a certain kind of person, conformed to Christ.
This character-centred strand sits alongside the rule-centred (Decalogue, natural law) and the love-centred (agape, situation ethics) strands, and a rounded account of Christian moral principles will recognise all three.
The first of the two great ethical systems the specification connects to Christian ethics is natural law, principally associated with Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), who synthesised Aristotle with Christian theology.
Key term: Natural law holds that God has built a rational, purposive order into creation, so that by reason we can discern the goods that fulfil human nature and the moral rules that protect them. It is deontological (duty- and rule-based) and absolutist (some acts are always wrong).
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.