You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Feminist philosophy of religion begins by refusing a comfortable assumption: that the concepts, language and institutions of traditional theology are gender-neutral. Feminist thinkers argue that the God of much classical Christianity — sovereign, omnipotent, ruling "from above" as Father, Lord and King — is shaped by patriarchal models of male authority, and that the relentlessly masculine language for God has not been innocent but has reinforced the association of divinity with maleness and so the subordination of women. The field divides sharply, however, on what follows. Reformists such as Rosemary Radford Ruether argue that Christianity contains, within its own prophetic tradition, the resources to overcome its patriarchy. Post-Christian thinkers such as Mary Daly and Daphne Hampson conclude that the tradition is patriarchal to the root and must be left behind — though they part company over whether to keep belief in God at all. A further strand, represented by Sallie McFague, Grace Jantzen and Pamela Sue Anderson, reconstructs the models and the epistemology of religion in less androcentric terms. This lesson sets out these positions precisely and weighs the central question: is Christianity reformable, or is patriarchy written into its foundations?
For most of Christian history, theology has been written by men, within institutions led by men, for an audience of men. The Fathers, the scholastics, the Reformers and the modern theologians who dominate the syllabus — Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin, Barth, Tillich — are without exception male, and women were largely excluded from theological education, ordination and authority. Feminist philosophers argue that this is not a mere sociological accident external to the content of theology: when only men do theology, theology tends to encode male experience and male models of power, producing (in the critical phrase) a God made in man's image.
Key term: Patriarchy — a social order in which men hold primary power and privilege across political, economic, religious and domestic life; feminist theologians argue it has distorted both the doctrine of God and the understanding of human nature.
Traditional Christian theology speaks of God overwhelmingly in male terms: Father, Son, Lord, King, "He." Theologians have always formally insisted that God transcends gender — Aquinas held that no creaturely category, including sex, applies to God literally — yet the persistent masculine imagery shapes the religious imagination regardless. Mary Daly (1928–2010) crystallised the worry in a sentence that has become the watchword of the field: "If God is male, then the male is God." Where the divine is consistently pictured as male, maleness is tacitly divinised and male authority acquires cosmic sanction.
Key term: Androcentrism — the practice of treating the male as the norm or centre, so that male experience is taken as the standard human experience and projected onto God and the cosmos.
There is a sophisticated philosophical argument buried in Daly's epigram, and it is worth drawing out, because the obvious reply ("but theologians say God is not really male") does not straightforwardly meet it. The feminist point is not that theologians believe God is male — most explicitly deny it — but that the symbolic system operates independently of that official disclaimer. Symbols, as the feminist theologians argue (drawing in part on Paul Tillich's own account of symbol), are not neutral labels; they shape consciousness, structure what feels natural, and confer authority. If, week after week, the ultimate reality, the source of all value, the one before whom we kneel, is addressed as "Father," "Lord," "King," "He" — and never as Mother, Queen, or She — then the effective message, whatever the small print of doctrine, is that the male is closer to the divine, the normative image of God, while the female is secondary, derivative, the "second sex." This is reinforced by the doctrine that humanity is made in God's image (imago Dei): if God is imaged as male, the male appears as the primary bearer of that image and the female as a lesser or mediated case — a reading explicit in some patristic and medieval writers (Augustine; aspects of the tradition that took the male as more fully rational). The feminist critique thus targets the level of the symbolic and the imaginative, which is precisely the level at which religion forms people, and which formal qualifications about divine transcendence of gender leave largely untouched.
A related target is the dualism that feminist theologians trace through Western religious thought: a series of paired opposites — spirit/matter, mind/body, reason/emotion, culture/nature, transcendence/immanence — in which the first term is consistently valorised and coded male, and the second subordinated and coded female. On this analysis, the association of women with body, nature, emotion and immanence, and of men with spirit, reason and transcendence, is not incidental but structural, and it underwrites both the subordination of women and (Ruether will argue) the domination of the natural world. Whether these dualisms are essential to the traditions or contingent accretions is one of the questions that divides reformist from post-Christian feminists.
Mary Daly, an American radical feminist philosopher and theologian, travelled from reform to revolution. In The Church and the Second Sex (1968) she still hoped to reform the Catholic Church's treatment of women. By Beyond God the Father (1973) she had concluded that reform was hopeless: patriarchy is not an accidental blemish on Christianity but constitutive of it. Christianity is, in her later judgement, irredeemably patriarchal, and women must take an "exodus" out of it.
| Theme | Daly's position |
|---|---|
| God as Verb, not Noun | God should not be conceived as a (male) being ruling from above but as Be-ing — a dynamic verb, the power of being and becoming. To freeze God into a noun is already to enthrone a "Supreme Patriarch." |
| Critique of Christology | The elevation of a single male saviour to the status of God reinforces the equation of maleness with divinity; for Daly this is "Christolatry," and it cannot be excised from Christianity. |
| Eve and the Fall | The Eve narrative has for centuries been used to blame women for sin and to associate the feminine with temptation and weakness — a "patriarchal myth." |
| Exodus from patriarchy | Women must not reform but leave patriarchal religion, creating new, woman-centred space and language. |
Daly's later work grew increasingly separatist and coined a deliberately provocative vocabulary (she spoke, for instance, of patriarchy's "unholy trinity" of rape, genocide and war as expressions of a death-dealing male order). The standard criticisms: her position is too extreme for many feminists, since it abandons a tradition that countless women find meaningful and demands they leave rather than reform it; her separatism is itself exclusionary; and in rejecting Christianity wholesale she arguably discards genuine liberating resources within it — throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
It is worth being precise about the trajectory of Daly's thought, because examiners reward candidates who can chart it rather than treating her as a single fixed position. In The Church and the Second Sex (1968) she is a reformer, cataloguing the church's sexism but hoping it can change — the Catholic equivalent of the secular liberal feminism of the 1960s. By Beyond God the Father (1973) she has become a revolutionary: the problem is no longer the church's behaviour but its symbol system, and in particular the patriarchal symbol of God; the famous chapter title announces the move "beyond" the Father. Her positive proposal here — God not as a static noun (a being, the Supreme Patriarch) but as Verb, "the Verb of Verbs," the dynamic power of Be-ing in which women participate as they "name" themselves and their world — is a genuine piece of constructive philosophy of religion, not mere rejection. By Gyn/Ecology (1978) and after, she has moved to an explicitly post-Christian, woman-centred position, inventing new language ("Crone," "Spinster," "the Background") to escape what she regards as the irredeemably "phallocentric" character of inherited speech. The deep philosophical claim underlying the whole journey is that language is not innocent: to think and speak in a patriarchal tongue is already to have one's consciousness shaped by patriarchy, so liberation requires not just new beliefs but new words. Whether this is a profound insight or a self-isolating retreat into idiosyncrasy is exactly the point on which Daly's admirers and critics divide.
Daphne Hampson (b. 1944), a British theologian and philosopher, shares Daly's conclusion that Christianity is irredeemably patriarchal, but reaches it by a distinct route — and, crucially, retains belief in God. Christianity, Hampson argues, is a historical religion: it stakes its truth on particular past events (the Incarnation, the Resurrection) and a particular historical person, Jesus of Nazareth, who was a man. A religion that must look back to a unique, male, first-century saviour as the decisive revelation of God cannot, she contends, be rendered genuinely egalitarian; the maleness of the Christ is not incidental but structurally central (the Son of the Father). She also argues that the very shape of Christian thought — its emphasis on a transcendent, intervening God, on sin and external salvation — reflects and entrenches heteronomy.
Hampson therefore distinguishes Christianity from theism: one can affirm God without being a Christian. She describes herself as post-Christian but not atheist — she continues to believe in a reality she calls God, encountered in and through the world, relationships and the depths of the self, but no longer mediated through the patriarchal apparatus of Christian doctrine. This sets up the field's sharpest internal disagreement, which she has staged directly with Rosemary Radford Ruether: Hampson holds the tradition unreformable; Ruether holds it reformable from within.
Hampson's argument is, in an important sense, more rigorous than Daly's, because it does not rest merely on the maleness of God-language (which could in principle be reformed by adopting female imagery) but on the historical structure of Christianity, which cannot be so easily revised. Her case has three steps. First, Christianity is essentially a historical religion: it does not teach timeless truths of reason (as, say, a purely natural theism might) but stakes everything on what God did at a particular time and place — the Incarnation and Resurrection of a particular first-century Jewish man. Second, that historical particularity is gendered: the decisive self-revelation of God is in a male saviour, the "Son" of the "Father," and the central symbols (Christ, the Son, the male disciples and apostolic succession) are male. Third — and this is the philosophical heart — because the revelation is tied to a past and male particular, it cannot be updated: one cannot have a "female Christ" or relocate the Incarnation, since Christianity is the claim that this man, then, was God incarnate. A religion so structured, Hampson concludes, cannot deliver the full equality of women, because it permanently privileges a male as the unique image and agent of God. She also rejects, on independent grounds, the heteronomy she sees in Christianity — its picture of a transcendent God who intervenes from outside and to whom one must submit — preferring a more immanent, relational sense of the divine consonant with human autonomy and maturity. Critics reply that she over-reads the maleness of Christ (the tradition holds that what saves is Christ's humanity, not his masculinity — "what is not assumed is not healed," in the patristic principle, refers to human nature) and that her tidy separation of "Christianity" from "theism" underestimates how much of her retained theism is itself a Christian inheritance.
Key term: Post-Christian — the position (Daly, Hampson) that Christianity is patriarchal beyond reform and must be left behind; Hampson, unlike Daly, retains belief in God (post-Christian theism), whereas Daly moves to a non-theist feminist spirituality.
Rosemary Radford Ruether (1936–2022), an American Catholic theologian, is the leading reformist voice: Christianity, she argues, contains within itself the resources to overcome its own patriarchy. In Sexism and God-Talk (1983) she develops a constructive feminist theology that criticises patriarchal images of God while remaining inside the tradition.
| Theme | Ruether's position |
|---|---|
| The prophetic-liberating tradition | The Bible itself contains a prophetic strand that denounces the powerful, defends the oppressed and proclaims God's justice. Feminism continues this biblical tradition by exposing patriarchy as a form of the injustice the prophets condemned. This is her key reply to Daly and Hampson: the critique of patriarchy is internal to Scripture, not imposed from outside. |
| God/ess | Ruether writes the divine as "God/ess" to disrupt the automatic equation of God with maleness and to gesture beyond gender, drawing on both male and female imagery. |
| The critical principle | Whatever "diminishes or denies the full humanity of women" cannot reflect the divine or be redemptive; conversely, what affirms women's full humanity does. This is her measuring rod for sorting the liberating from the patriarchal within the tradition. |
| Christ and redemption | Christ's maleness is not theologically essential; what is redemptive is Jesus' praxis of solidarity with the marginalised. Redemption is liberation from all structures of oppression, including patriarchy. |
Ruether also pioneered ecofeminism, arguing that the domination of women and the domination of nature spring from the same hierarchical dualisms (mind over body, culture over nature, male over female), so that the liberation of women and the healing of the earth belong together. Criticisms: Daly and Hampson judge her reformism naïve — patriarchy is too deep in the foundations to be reformed away, and a faith centred on a male saviour cannot reach full equality; conservatives charge that she distorts the tradition by reading modern political categories back into ancient texts; and the term "God/ess" can seem alienating to ordinary worshippers.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.