You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Religious experience is, for many believers, the most direct reason to think God real: not an inference from the world's order or existence, but an apparent first-hand encounter. Across cultures and centuries individuals have reported awe before the holy, conversions that overturned a life, and mystical states of union in which the boundary between the self and the divine seems to dissolve. The philosophical question the AQA 7062 specification sets is sharply evaluative: do such experiences provide genuine evidence — even a "proof" — of God, or can they be wholly accounted for by psychology, neuroscience and cultural conditioning? This lesson sets out the spec-named material precisely: the numinous (Otto), the marks of mystical experience (William James), the distinction between extrovertive and introvertive mysticism (Walter Stace), and the argument from experience built on the principles of credulity and testimony (Swinburne) — before weighing the challenges from science and psychology and reaching a judgement. Throughout, the AO2 task is not to describe these experiences but to assess whether the move from "it seemed to me that God was present" to "God was present" is a reasonable one.
The specification distinguishes several forms of experience, and precision here pays dividends in evaluation, because an objection that bites against one type may leave another untouched.
A long tradition, given its classic threefold form by St Teresa of Avila (1515–1582) and St Augustine, distinguishes three kinds of vision. A corporeal vision is one in which an external figure is apparently seen with the bodily eyes (the figure at Lourdes seen by Bernadette, on the believer's account). An imaginative vision occurs in the mind — in a dream or a waking image — without an external object, as in the dreams of Joseph in Matthew's Gospel. An intellectual vision involves no image at all but a direct, non-sensory awareness of a truth or presence; Teresa described an awareness of Christ beside her in which she "saw" nothing yet was certain of his presence. The distinction matters evaluatively: a corporeal vision invites the question "was anything really there to be seen?", whereas an intellectual vision, having no sensory content, sidesteps that particular doubt while raising the different worry that an experience with no checkable content is impossible to test.
Key term: Corporeal, imaginative and intellectual visions — three traditional classes of visionary experience: respectively, an apparent seeing with the bodily eyes; an image in the mind without an external object; and a non-sensory intellectual awareness of a presence or truth.
A mystical experience involves a direct, immediate awareness of God or ultimate reality — a sense of union or oneness that transcends ordinary subject–object consciousness. Mystics from different traditions report strikingly convergent features: timelessness, the dissolution of the self–world boundary, overwhelming peace, and the conviction that what is disclosed is more real than ordinary experience. Figures often cited include Meister Eckhart (c. 1260–1328), who spoke of the soul's union with the divine "ground," and the Sufi poet Rumi (1207–1273), who described the soul's longing for reunion with God. The mystical is the form on which both James and Stace concentrate, and it is the form that most directly claims to be cognitive — to deliver knowledge of how things ultimately are.
A conversion experience is a transformation — often sudden, sometimes gradual — of belief, attitude and direction of life. The paradigm biblical case is the conversion of Saul on the road to Damascus (Acts 9), where a blinding light and the voice of the risen Christ turned the persecutor into the apostle Paul. A frequently cited later case is John Wesley's Aldersgate experience of 1738, in which he felt his heart "strangely warmed" — an experience he placed at the root of the Methodist revival. William James devoted close attention to conversion, distinguishing the gradual ("volitional") type, in which the new self is built up piece by piece, from the sudden ("self-surrender") type, in which the change breaks in seemingly from without after the subject stops striving. James was careful to note that conversion's evidential significance lies not in its drama but in its fruits — the genuinely altered life that follows — which is why the transformed conduct of a converted addict or reformed criminal is, for James, the most telling datum and, for the sceptic, precisely the point at which a wholly natural change of heart cannot be excluded.
Some experiences are corporate — undergone by a group together. The events at the Toronto Airport Vineyard church from 1994 (the "Toronto Blessing"), and the regular ecstatic phenomena of Pentecostal worship (speaking in tongues, collective weeping), are modern examples; the claimed solar phenomenon witnessed by a large crowd at Fátima in 1917 is another. The corporate character is double-edged for evaluation: shared experience seems harder to dismiss as one person's delusion, yet it also invites the rival explanation of crowd suggestion and collective expectation.
Key term: Corporate religious experience — a religious experience undergone simultaneously by a group of people; cited as stronger evidence than a private experience, but also open to explanation in terms of group suggestion.
Rudolf Otto (1869–1937), in The Idea of the Holy (Das Heilige, 1917), argued that at the heart of religion lies a unique kind of experience that cannot be reduced to morality or reason. He coined the term numinous (from the Latin numen, a divine power) for the experience of the holy as such. The numinous is, in Otto's phrase, an apprehension of the "wholly other" (ganz andere) — a reality utterly beyond and unlike the created order, which cannot be captured in ordinary concepts.
Otto analyses the numinous as the experience of mysterium tremendum et fascinans. The mysterium is the sheer otherness and incomprehensibility of the holy; the tremendum is the element of awe, dread and overwhelming majesty before which the subject feels their own nothingness — what Otto calls the "creature-feeling" (the sense of being but dust and ashes before the infinite, as in Abraham's words in Genesis 18:27); and the fascinans is the element of fascination and attraction, by which the very reality that terrifies also draws the subject irresistibly toward it.
| Element of the numinous | Otto's meaning |
|---|---|
| Mysterium | The wholly other — a holiness utterly beyond human comprehension and category |
| Tremendum | Awe, dread, overwhelming majesty; the "creature-feeling" of one's own nothingness |
| Fascinans | Fascination and attraction; the holy both repels in awe and draws the subject toward it |
Key term: Numinous — Otto's term for the non-rational experience of the holy as the "wholly other," felt as mysterium tremendum et fascinans (awe-inspiring mystery that both overwhelms and attracts). It is, for Otto, a category sui generis, not reducible to moral or rational ideas.
Two points are crucial for evaluation. First, Otto insists the numinous is non-rational — not irrational, but prior to and independent of concepts; it is felt before it is thought, and it can only be evoked, not defined (he speaks of an a priori capacity in the human spirit to which the holy answers). He illustrates the numinous from across the religious record — the dread of the worshipper in the Hebrew temple, Isaiah's "Woe is me, for I am undone" before the thrice-holy God (Isaiah 6), Job's silencing encounter with the voice from the whirlwind — precisely to show that the feeling of the holy runs deeper than, and is presupposed by, any moral or doctrinal content layered on top of it. Religion, on Otto's view, did not begin in ethics or metaphysics but in this awe-struck shudder before the holy, which the later "rational" attributes (goodness, omnipotence) come to schematise but never exhaust.
Second, Otto's account is descriptive rather than straightforwardly evidential: he sets out to describe the distinctive phenomenology of the holy, not to prove a being exists. A critic may therefore grant Otto's brilliant description of the feeling while denying that the feeling is of anything beyond the subject — exactly the gap the rest of the topic must address. There is a further evaluative double-edge in Otto's insistence on non-rationality. On the one hand, it protects the numinous from the verificationist complaint that religious claims are empty, since Otto never pretends the experience is a testable assertion. On the other hand, the very feature that makes the numinous resistant to reductive analysis also makes it resistant to confirmation: an experience defined as beyond concepts cannot easily be cross-checked, and a Freudian or neuroscientific critic will say that an overwhelming, ineffable feeling of awe-mixed-with-attraction is exactly what one would expect a powerful natural brain-state to feel like from the inside. Otto thus identifies something every account of religion must reckon with, while leaving its ultimate cause open.
William James (1842–1910), the American philosopher and psychologist, produced the most influential study of the field in The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902), the published form of his Gifford Lectures. James approached religious experience empirically, as a natural scientist of the inner life, collecting and classifying first-hand reports rather than ruling on their ultimate cause in advance. His most examined contribution is the four marks of a mystical experience.
| Mark | James's meaning |
|---|---|
| Ineffability | The experience defies adequate expression in words; like a state of feeling, it must be directly undergone to be known, and "cannot be imparted or transferred to others" |
| Noetic quality | Though akin to feeling, it presents itself as a state of knowledge — an insight into depths of truth unplumbed by the discursive intellect, carrying a "curious sense of authority" |
| Transiency | The state cannot be sustained for long — usually minutes, rarely as much as an hour or two — though its effects on the inner life may be lasting |
| Passivity | Though the onset may be facilitated (by prayer, fasting or discipline), the mystic feels their own will in abeyance, as if grasped and held by a superior power |
James held that the first two marks — ineffability and the noetic quality — are the defining ones, the latter two usually but not always present. The noetic quality is the philosophically loaded mark: it is the experiencer's own conviction that the state delivers knowledge, not merely emotion. James's own carefully hedged conclusion is important and often misreported. He argued that mystical states are, and should be, absolutely authoritative for the individual who has them — it would be unreasonable to expect the mystic to disbelieve their own experience. But they are not authoritative for those who stand outside them and have no warrant to accept the mystic's claims at second hand. What the existence of such states does establish, James thought, is more modest but real: that "rationalistic consciousness" based on the senses and logic is not the only kind of consciousness, and that the ordinary world may be only "one kind of world" among others.
Key term: Noetic quality — for James, the way a mystical experience presents itself not as mere emotion but as knowledge — an authoritative insight into truth that the intellect could not reach. It is this claim to knowledge that makes religious experience a candidate piece of evidence.
James also adopted a pragmatic method of assessment, judging experiences not by their origin but by their fruits — their effects on the life of the person. A "saintliness" that issues in love, courage, charity and inner peace has, for James, a value and a kind of vindication that no enquiry into causes can erase: "by their fruits ye shall know them, not by their roots." This usefully sidesteps the genetic question (one can grant that an experience has a neurological trigger and still ask what it produces) but it equally concedes the sceptic a point, since fruitfulness shows the experience is valuable, not that it is veridical — a kind and transformed life might follow from a wholly natural episode.
Key term: Pragmatism (James) — the approach of assessing a belief or experience by its practical consequences (its "fruits") rather than by its theoretical truth or causal origin; "by their fruits ye shall know them."
Walter Stace (1886–1967), in Mysticism and Philosophy (1960), refined the analysis of mystical experience by distinguishing two fundamental types, while arguing for a "common core" beneath the doctrinal differences of the traditions.
An extrovertive mystical experience looks outward through the senses: the mystic perceives the ordinary world of objects but sees it transfigured, apprehending a unity shining through the multiplicity of things — "all is One," and the One is perceived as inwardly alive and sacred. An introvertive experience looks inward and is, for Stace, the higher and purer form: the mystic progressively empties consciousness of all particular sensations, images and thoughts until what remains is a "unitary consciousness" — a pure, contentless awareness of undifferentiated unity, beyond space and time. In both, Stace identifies common marks: a sense of objectivity (it feels like a disclosure of reality, not a fancy), blessedness and peace, a feeling of the holy, paradoxicality, and — echoing James — ineffability.
| Extrovertive mysticism | Introvertive mysticism | |
|---|---|---|
| Direction | Outward, through the senses | Inward, emptying the senses |
| Content | The ordinary world perceived as a living unity ("all is One") | Pure unitary consciousness; undifferentiated unity, no content |
| Stace's ranking | The lower, incomplete form | The higher, complete form |
| Shared marks | Objectivity, blessedness, sense of the holy, paradoxicality, ineffability | The same shared marks |
Key term: Introvertive / extrovertive mysticism (Stace) — extrovertive mysticism perceives a unity in and through the external world of the senses; introvertive mysticism turns inward, emptying consciousness of all content to reach a pure, undifferentiated unitary consciousness.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.