You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Functionalism is a structural, macro-level, consensus theory of society. It views society as a system of interconnected parts that work together to maintain social order and stability. Functionalists argue that each social institution (the family, education, religion, the economy, the political system) performs essential functions that contribute to the well-being of society as a whole. Understanding functionalism is a core requirement of the AQA A-Level Sociology specification: it is the perspective against which conflict and action theories define themselves, so a secure grasp of it is the foundation for almost every evaluative answer you will write.
Key Definition: Functionalism is a sociological perspective that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. It examines social institutions in terms of the positive functions they perform for the maintenance of the whole society.
Functionalism is examined in the Theory and Methods sections of Paper 1 and Paper 3, and it is the dominant consensus position you will apply across the substantive topics. In education it supplies Durkheim's "social solidarity" and Parsons' "school as bridge / meritocracy"; in the family it supplies Murdock's four functions and Parsons' "personality factory"; in beliefs it supplies Durkheim's account of religion and the sacred; and in crime and deviance it supplies Durkheim's argument that crime is normal and functional and Merton's strain theory.
Hold these threads as you read. Functionalism's claim that institutions exist because of the functions they perform is challenged at every turn by Marxism (institutions serve the ruling class, not "society"), by feminism (they serve men, not "society"), and by interactionism (society is built bottom-up through meaning, not top-down through structure). Methodologically, functionalism sits in the positivist camp: Durkheim's Suicide is the archetypal positivist study, treating quantitative official statistics as social facts and seeking cause-and-effect relationships. When you evaluate functionalism in any topic, reach for these cross-perspective and methodological links — they are exactly the synopticity examiners reward.
Functionalists frequently compare society to a biological organism — this is known as the organic analogy. Just as the human body is made up of interdependent organs (the heart, lungs, liver, brain), each of which performs a vital function to keep the body alive and healthy, so society is composed of interdependent institutions, each performing functions necessary for social survival. The analogy descends from Herbert Spencer, who explicitly likened the institutions of society to the organs of a body.
| Biological Organism | Society |
|---|---|
| Organs (heart, lungs, liver) | Social institutions (family, education, economy) |
| Cells | Individuals |
| Health/homeostasis | Social order/stability |
| Disease | Social dysfunction/deviance |
| Evolution/adaptation | Social change |
If one organ fails, the whole body is affected; similarly, if one institution ceases to function effectively, the entire social system is disrupted. This analogy emphasises interdependence, consensus, and the idea that society is sui generis — more than the sum of its parts.
Evaluation (AO3):
Durkheim is often considered the founding father of functionalism. His work laid the foundations for the sociological study of social institutions, social solidarity, and the collective conscience, and established sociology as an academic discipline distinct from psychology and philosophy.
Durkheim argued that social facts — the norms, values, beliefs, and institutional arrangements of society — are external to individuals and exercise a coercive power over them. Social facts must be treated as "things" that can be observed and studied scientifically, just like natural phenomena. This is the founding methodological claim of positivist sociology.
In The Division of Labour in Society (1893), Durkheim distinguished between two types of social solidarity:
Mechanical solidarity characterises pre-industrial, traditional societies. Social cohesion is based on similarity — people share the same values, beliefs, and way of life. The collective conscience (the shared moral beliefs of the community) is strong and all-encompassing. There is little division of labour; most people perform similar economic tasks.
Organic solidarity characterises modern, industrial societies. Social cohesion is based on interdependence arising from the complex division of labour. People specialise in different occupations and depend on one another to meet their needs. The collective conscience weakens as individualism grows, but new forms of solidarity emerge through economic and legal ties.
In The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912), Durkheim argued that religion functions to bind society together by reinforcing the collective conscience. Through collective worship of the sacred, he claimed, society is in effect "worshipping itself" — sacred symbols (the totem) represent the social group. This is a key synoptic link to the beliefs in society topic.
Anomie is Durkheim's concept for a state of normlessness — a breakdown of social norms and values that occurs when the pace of social change outstrips society's ability to develop new moral guidelines. Anomie leads to confusion, alienation, and, in extreme cases, increased rates of suicide.
In Suicide (1897), Durkheim demonstrated that suicide rates are not simply the result of individual psychology but are shaped by social forces, particularly the degree of social integration and moral regulation. He identified four types of suicide:
| Type of suicide | Social cause | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Egoistic | Too little integration | The individual is insufficiently bound into social groups (e.g. Durkheim noted higher rates among Protestants than the more communal Catholics) |
| Altruistic | Too much integration | The individual is so absorbed into the group that they sacrifice themselves for it |
| Anomic | Too little regulation | Norms break down during rapid social change or economic upheaval |
| Fatalistic | Too much regulation | The individual is so oppressively over-regulated that life seems hopeless |
Exam Tip: Durkheim's study of suicide is a classic example of how sociology goes beyond common-sense explanations. It demonstrates the functionalist (and positivist) method of treating social phenomena as social facts that can be explained by other social facts, rather than by individual motives.
Evaluation (AO3): The interpretivist Jack Douglas (1967) attacked Durkheim's reliance on official suicide statistics, arguing that these are socially constructed by coroners' decisions rather than objective facts, so they tell us more about labelling than about real suicide. J. Maxwell Atkinson (1978), an ethnomethodologist, went further, arguing there is no "real" rate behind the statistics — only the interpretive work of officials. This is a powerful synoptic illustration of the positivism–interpretivism methods debate applied to a functionalist classic.
Durkheim made the counter-intuitive argument that crime is normal and even functional for society: it is found in every society, and a certain level performs positive functions — boundary maintenance (punishment reaffirms shared values), adaptation and change (today's deviant may be tomorrow's reformer), and acting as a social "warning light" of dysfunction. This is a key reference for the crime and deviance topic.
Parsons was the most influential functionalist of the twentieth century. He developed a highly systematic theory of society that attempted to explain how social order is maintained and how societies adapt to change.
Parsons began from the "Hobbesian problem of order": why is social life not a war of all against all? His answer was value consensus — widespread agreement on the fundamental values of society — secured through socialisation and reinforced by social control. Individuals internalise shared values so thoroughly that they want to do what the social system needs them to do; in this way, the potential conflict between individual desire and social requirement is dissolved. In American society, Parsons identified the central value as instrumental activism — the belief in individual achievement, competition, and material success.
Parsons argued that every society must meet four functional prerequisites — essential needs that must be satisfied for the society to survive. He organised these into the AGIL schema:
| Function | Full Name | Social Institution | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Adaptation | The economy | Meeting material needs; producing and distributing goods and services |
| G | Goal attainment | The political system | Setting collective goals and mobilising resources to achieve them |
| I | Integration | The legal system, religion, media | Maintaining social cohesion and solidarity; resolving conflicts |
| L | Latency (pattern maintenance) | The family, education | Transmitting shared norms and values; managing tensions and motivating individuals |
Each subsystem performs a vital function, and all four are interdependent. A failure in one creates problems for the others. The diagram below shows how Parsons connected the functional prerequisites to institutions and, ultimately, to the socialised individual — the "top-down" logic that defines functionalism as a structural theory.
flowchart TB
A["Functional prerequisites (society's needs)"] --> B["Adaptation: the economy"]
A --> C["Goal attainment: the political system"]
A --> D["Integration: law, religion, media"]
A --> E["Latency / pattern maintenance: family & education"]
E --> F["Socialisation transmits shared values"]
D --> F
F --> G["Value consensus internalised"]
G --> H["Individuals willingly perform their roles"]
H --> I["Social order and stability"]
This flow captures both the strength and the weakness of functionalism in one image: it elegantly explains how order might be produced, but every arrow assumes consensus rather than coercion — precisely the assumption Marxists and feminists reject.
In his essay on the school class as a social system, Parsons argued that education acts as a bridge between the family and wider society. The family judges a child by particularistic standards (special treatment because they are "ours") and ascribed status; wider society judges by universalistic standards (the same rules for everyone) and achieved status. School socialises children into this shift and into the value of meritocracy — the belief that rewards are earned through ability and effort. This is a central reference for the education topic and a prime target for Marxist critique.
Parsons saw society as composed of three interconnected systems:
Effective socialisation creates a fit between the personality system and the social system. This is sometimes called the "oversocialised conception of man," a criticism we return to below.
Merton made important modifications to Parsons' functionalism, making it more nuanced and empirically applicable. His key contributions include the concepts of manifest and latent functions, dysfunction, and strain theory.
Merton argued, against Parsons, that not everything in society is functional. Some practices may be dysfunctional — harmful to society or to particular groups. Religion, for example, can be functional (cohesion, moral guidance) but also dysfunctional (intolerance, justifying inequality, inter-group conflict).
Merton introduced functional alternatives — the idea that the same function can be performed by different institutions. In some societies religion provides the moral framework; in more secular societies education or the legal system may do so.
Merton critiqued three assumptions of classical (Parsonian) functionalism:
Merton's strain theory (1938) applied functionalist logic to deviance: when society sets universal goals (the "American Dream" of material success) but distributes the legitimate means to reach them unequally, the resulting strain to anomie produces deviance. Individuals adapt in five ways:
Strain theory is an essential reference for the crime and deviance topic and a bridge between functionalism and later subcultural theory (Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin), which extended Merton by explaining collective, non-utilitarian and differently structured deviance. Note that strain theory retains the functionalist assumption of a shared success goal — exactly the consensus premise that Marxists and interactionists dispute, since they argue goals and the definition of "success" are themselves contested and class-bound. This shows how even functionalism's most empirically fertile theory carries the perspective's core consensual assumptions, and so inherits its core vulnerability.
Functionalism is not merely an abstract theory; it generates concrete claims you can deploy in every substantive topic, which is exactly what synoptic application requires.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.