You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The story of the atom is one of the most remarkable journeys in the history of science. Over barely a century, our understanding shifted from "atoms are indivisible spheres" to "atoms are mostly empty space with a dense nucleus surrounded by probability clouds of electrons." Each model built on the last, correcting its failures while introducing new questions.
timeline
title Development of Atomic Theory
1803 : Dalton's Solid Sphere Model
: Atoms are indivisible
1897 : Thomson's Plum Pudding Model
: Discovery of the electron
1911 : Rutherford's Nuclear Model
: Gold foil experiment
1913 : Bohr's Model
: Quantised energy levels
1926 : Wave-Mechanical Model
: Schrodinger equation and orbitals
John Dalton proposed that all matter is made of indivisible atoms -- tiny, solid spheres that cannot be created or destroyed. Each element is composed of identical atoms, and compounds form when atoms of different elements combine in fixed ratios.
Dalton's model explained the law of conservation of mass and the law of definite proportions, but it assumed atoms had no internal structure. There were no subatomic particles in Dalton's universe.
Key limitation: Dalton could not explain electrical phenomena or the existence of isotopes.
J.J. Thomson discovered the electron using cathode ray tubes. He measured the charge-to-mass ratio of these particles and showed they were much lighter than atoms. Since atoms are electrically neutral, Thomson proposed that the atom was a sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it -- like plums in a pudding.
Key features:
How Thomson measured the electron: Thomson applied electric and magnetic fields to cathode rays. By balancing the deflection from each field, he calculated the charge-to-mass ratio (e/m) of the particles. The value was the same regardless of the cathode material or the gas in the tube, proving these were fundamental particles -- not fragments of atoms.
Key limitation: Thomson's model could not explain the results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment.
Ernest Rutherford directed alpha particles at a thin sheet of gold foil. Most passed straight through, but a small fraction were deflected at large angles, and a very few bounced straight back.
This was completely incompatible with Thomson's model. If the positive charge were spread out evenly, no alpha particles would bounce back. Rutherford concluded:
| Observation | Approximate Fraction | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Passed straight through | ~99.99% | Atom is mostly empty space |
| Deflected at small angles | ~0.01% | Nucleus has positive charge, repelling alpha particles |
| Bounced back (>90 degrees) | ~1 in 20,000 | Nucleus is very small, very dense, and positively charged |
Rutherford estimated the nucleus is roughly 10,000 times smaller than the atom -- if the atom were the size of a football stadium, the nucleus would be about the size of a marble at the centre.
Key limitation: According to classical physics, orbiting electrons should continuously emit electromagnetic radiation, lose energy, and spiral into the nucleus. Rutherford's model could not explain why atoms are stable.
Niels Bohr modified Rutherford's model by proposing that electrons exist in fixed energy levels (shells) around the nucleus. Electrons can only occupy specific orbits and can move between them by absorbing or emitting a precise quantum of energy.
Key features:
This model successfully explained the line spectrum of hydrogen -- the specific wavelengths of light emitted by hydrogen atoms.
When an electron drops from a higher energy level to a lower one, a photon is emitted with energy exactly equal to the difference between the two levels:
Delta E = E(higher) - E(lower) = hf
where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the emitted photon.
| Transition Series | Drops To | Region of Spectrum |
|---|---|---|
| Lyman | n = 1 | Ultraviolet |
| Balmer | n = 2 | Visible |
| Paschen | n = 3 | Infrared |
The lines converge at higher energies because the energy levels get closer together as n increases. The convergence limit corresponds to ionisation -- removing the electron entirely.
Key limitation: Bohr's model worked well for hydrogen but failed for multi-electron atoms. It could not explain the fine structure of spectral lines or the shapes of orbitals.
The modern model, developed by Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and others, treats electrons not as particles in fixed orbits but as wave-like entities described by mathematical functions called wavefunctions. The square of the wavefunction gives the probability of finding an electron in a particular region of space -- an orbital.
Key features:
You cannot simultaneously know both the exact position and exact momentum of an electron. The more precisely you know one, the less precisely you can know the other. This is why we must describe electrons in terms of probability distributions (orbitals) rather than definite paths (orbits).
All atoms are built from three fundamental particles:
| Particle | Relative Mass | Relative Charge | Location | Actual Mass (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proton | 1 | +1 | Nucleus | 1.673 x 10^-27 |
| Neutron | 1 | 0 | Nucleus | 1.675 x 10^-27 |
| Electron | 1/1836 (approx 0) | -1 | Orbitals around nucleus | 9.109 x 10^-31 |
An atom is represented as:
A over Z, then the element symbol (e.g. carbon-12: mass number 12, atomic number 6)
The number of neutrons = A - Z.
Isotopes are atoms of the same element (same number of protons) that have different numbers of neutrons. For example, chlorine has two stable isotopes:
Both have identical chemical properties because they have the same electron configuration. They differ in mass and in nuclear stability.
| Isotope | Application |
|---|---|
| Carbon-14 | Radiocarbon dating of archaeological specimens |
| Iodine-131 | Medical diagnosis and treatment of thyroid conditions |
| Cobalt-60 | Radiotherapy for cancer treatment |
| Uranium-235 | Nuclear fission in power stations |
| Deuterium (H-2) | NMR spectroscopy, nuclear fusion research |
Misconception: "Isotopes of the same element have different chemical properties because they have different masses."
Correction: Chemical properties depend on electron configuration, which is determined by the number of protons (and hence electrons in a neutral atom). Since isotopes have the same number of protons, they have identical electron configurations and therefore identical chemical properties. The mass difference only affects physical properties such as rate of diffusion, density, and boiling point.
Because elements often exist as a mixture of isotopes, we define the relative atomic mass as the weighted mean mass of an atom of the element relative to 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom.
Carbon-12 was chosen as the standard because:
Chlorine exists as 75.0% 35-Cl and 25.0% 37-Cl. Calculate the relative atomic mass.
Ar = (75.0/100 x 35) + (25.0/100 x 37) Ar = 26.25 + 9.25 Ar = 35.5
This is why chlorine's relative atomic mass is 35.5 rather than a whole number -- it reflects the natural mixture of isotopes.
Lithium has two stable isotopes: 6-Li (7.59%) and 7-Li (92.41%). Calculate the relative atomic mass.
Ar = (7.59/100 x 6) + (92.41/100 x 7) Ar = 0.4554 + 6.4687 Ar = 6.9 (to 1 d.p.)
Ar = Sum of (fractional abundance x isotopic mass)
If given percentages, divide each by 100 before multiplying. If given peak heights or ratios from a mass spectrum, use those as the relative abundances and divide by the total.
When atoms gain or lose electrons, they form ions:
| Process | Result | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Metal atom loses electrons | Positive ion (cation) | Na -> Na+ + e- |
| Non-metal atom gains electrons | Negative ion (anion) | Cl + e- -> Cl- |
When identifying a species from its particle composition:
An atom has 20 protons, 20 neutrons, and 18 electrons. Identify the species.
Edexcel 9CH0 specification Topic 1 — Atomic Structure and the Periodic Table, sub-topic 1.1 covers the development of atomic models from Dalton through Thomson's plum pudding, Rutherford's nuclear atom, Bohr's quantised shells and the modern quantum mechanical picture; relative masses and charges of protons, neutrons and electrons; the use of mass number, atomic number and isotopes; and the calculation of relative atomic mass from isotopic abundance data (refer to the official Pearson Edexcel specification document for exact wording). This is examined principally in Paper 1 (Advanced Inorganic and Physical Chemistry), but the model and the language of subatomic particles thread into Paper 2 (Organic and Physical) — mass spectra of organic molecules and into Paper 3 (General and Practical) — data interpretation. The spec assumes prior GCSE knowledge of nuclear notation and treats this sub-topic as a launchpad for ionisation energies (1.3), mass spectrometry (1.4) and periodicity (1.5).
Question (8 marks):
Chlorine has two stable isotopes, ⁵Cl and ⁷Cl. A sample of natural chlorine analysed by time-of-flight mass spectrometry produced peaks at m/z = 35 and m/z = 37 with relative abundances 75.78% and 24.22% respectively.
(a) Define the term relative atomic mass. (2) (b) Calculate the relative atomic mass of this sample of chlorine to 2 decimal places. (3) (c) Explain, in terms of subatomic particles, why ⁵Cl and ⁷Cl have identical chemical reactivity but different physical properties such as density. (3)
Solution with mark scheme:
(a) B1 — the weighted mean mass of the atoms of an element, taking into account the relative abundance of each isotope. B1 — measured relative to 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom. Common error: candidates write "the mass of one atom" omitting both the mean and the relative-to-¹²C benchmark — that scores 0.
(b) Step 1 — set up the weighted mean.
Ar=100(35×75.78)+(37×24.22)
M1 — correct weighted-mean expression. Common error: averaging 35 and 37 to 36 ignores abundance.
Step 2 — evaluate.
Ar=1002652.30+896.14=1003548.44=35.4844
M1 — correct arithmetic.
A1 — answer correctly rounded to 35.48 (2 d.p.). Premature rounding to 35.5 loses the A1.
(c) B1 — both isotopes have the same number of protons (17) and therefore the same number of electrons (17). B1 — chemical reactivity depends on electronic configuration, which is identical, hence chemistry is the same. B1 — they differ in neutron number (18 vs 20), giving different masses and therefore different densities and slightly different rates of diffusion. Common error: candidates conflate "different atomic mass" with "different chemistry". The mark requires the explicit electron-configuration link.
Total: 8 marks (B2 + M2 A1 + B3).
Question (6 marks): A student is shown four historical models of the atom: Dalton's indivisible sphere, Thomson's plum pudding, Rutherford's nuclear model and Bohr's shell model.
(a) State one experimental observation that ruled out the plum pudding model and led to Rutherford's nuclear atom. (2) (b) Explain how the Bohr model improved on Rutherford's by accounting for emission line spectra of hydrogen. (2) (c) State one limitation of the Bohr model that is addressed by the quantum mechanical model. (2)
Mark scheme decomposition by AO:
| Part | AO1 | AO2 | AO3 | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| (b) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| (c) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
(a) B1 (AO1.1) — alpha particles deflected through large angles / a small fraction bounced back. B1 (AO2.1) — interpretation that mass and positive charge must be concentrated in a tiny dense nucleus, since most alpha particles passed through.
(b) B1 (AO1.1) — Bohr proposed quantised electron energy levels (fixed-energy shells). B1 (AO2.1) — emission lines correspond to electrons falling between discrete levels, releasing photons of fixed energy hence fixed frequency.
(c) B1 (AO1.1) — the Bohr model treats electrons as orbiting in fixed circular paths. B1 (AO2.1) — the quantum mechanical model replaces orbits with orbitals (regions of probability) and accounts for the dual wave–particle nature of electrons.
Total: 6 marks split AO1 = 3, AO2 = 3. This question is balanced — AO1 for recall of the historical models, AO2 for connecting evidence to inference.
| AO | Typical share | Earned by |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 (knowledge / recall) | 40–50% | Stating model features, defining isotope and relative atomic mass, recalling charges and masses of subatomic particles |
| AO2 (application) | 40–50% | Calculating Aᵣ from abundance data, linking experimental observations (alpha scattering, line spectra) to model features |
| AO3 (analysis / evaluation) | 0–10% | Critiquing models — used in extended-response Section C-style questions |
Examiner-rewarded phrasing: "weighted mean mass relative to 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom"; "alpha particles deflected through large angles indicate a concentrated positive nucleus"; "electrons occupy quantised energy levels". Phrases that lose marks: "atoms have different mass" (without specifying isotopes have the same proton number); "Bohr's electrons orbit like planets" (the planetary metaphor is fine in passing but cannot be the only description — examiners want quantised levels). Many candidates lose marks here by omitting the comparative benchmark in the Aᵣ definition or by failing to give the abundance-weighted form of the calculation.
Question: State the relative masses and relative charges of a proton, a neutron and an electron.
Grade A response (~210 words):*
A proton has a relative mass of 1 (taking the proton mass as the unit) and a relative charge of +1. A neutron has the same relative mass of 1 (more precisely, 1.001 in mass-spectrometric units, but the spec value of 1 is accepted) and a relative charge of 0. An electron has a relative mass of approximately 1/1836 — usually quoted as "negligible" in atomic-mass calculations — and a relative charge of −1. The proton and neutron are nucleons and together account for essentially the entire mass of the atom. The electron carries the same magnitude of charge as the proton but with opposite sign, which is why a neutral atom must contain equal numbers of protons and electrons.
Examiner commentary: Full marks (3/3). This earns full marks because the candidate gives all three particles' masses and charges in the requested form, and adds the synoptic point that nucleons account for atomic mass. The use of 1/1836 for the electron is unnecessary at A-Level (the mark scheme accepts "negligible") but does not harm. The structure — particle, mass, charge — is examiner-friendly. Candidates who write "1, 1, 0" without naming the particles each value belongs to lose the B mark for clarity.
Question: Explain how the development of atomic models from Thomson through to the quantum mechanical picture was driven by experimental evidence. Refer to at least three experiments or observations.
Grade A response (~330 words):*
Thomson's 1897 cathode ray experiments showed that "rays" from the cathode were deflected by electric and magnetic fields, indicating they consisted of negatively charged particles much lighter than the hydrogen atom — the electron. This led to the plum pudding model: a sphere of positive charge in which electrons were embedded.
The plum pudding model was disproved by Rutherford's gold foil experiment. Most alpha particles passed through unaffected, but a small fraction were deflected through large angles and a few rebounded almost backwards. This observation was incompatible with diffuse positive charge: it required a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus accounting for almost all the atomic mass, with electrons occupying the much larger space outside.
Rutherford's model could not explain why hydrogen's emission spectrum consists of discrete lines rather than a continuum. Bohr proposed that electrons occupy quantised energy levels (shells); a transition from a higher to a lower level emits a photon of fixed energy hf = ΔE, producing a discrete line at a fixed frequency. This accounted for the Balmer, Lyman and Paschen series quantitatively for hydrogen.
The Bohr model failed for multi-electron atoms and could not account for the fine structure of spectral lines or for electron diffraction (Davisson–Germer, 1927). The quantum mechanical model — Schrödinger's wave equation — replaced fixed circular orbits with orbitals: three-dimensional probability distributions characterised by quantum numbers. This explains s, p, d, f orbitals, the aufbau principle and the periodic table itself.
Examiner commentary: Full marks (6/6). This earns full marks because the candidate cites three named experiments (cathode rays, gold foil, hydrogen emission spectrum) and one fourth (electron diffraction), explicitly linking each to the model change it forced. The chronology is clean and each step is causal — model A failed because of observation X, leading to model B. AO2 marks are secured by the link between alpha scattering and a concentrated positive nucleus, and between line spectra and quantised levels.
Question: A sample of element X has three isotopes with mass numbers 24, 25 and 26 in relative abundances 78.99%, 10.00% and 11.01% respectively. (a) Calculate the relative atomic mass of X to 2 decimal places. (b) Identify element X. (c) Predict, with reasoning, the bonding type and physical state of X at room temperature.
Grade A response (~360 words):*
(a) Weighted mean:
Ar=100(24×78.99)+(25×10.00)+(26×11.01)
=1001895.76+250.00+286.26=1002432.02=24.32
So Aᵣ(X) = 24.32 to 2 d.p.
(b) The element with Aᵣ ≈ 24.3 is magnesium.
(c) Magnesium is in Group 2 of the periodic table with electron configuration [Ne] 3s². It loses both 3s electrons relatively easily to form Mg²⁺. The resulting structure consists of Mg²⁺ cations in a regular lattice surrounded by a sea of delocalised electrons — the metallic bonding model. At room temperature magnesium is a solid because the strong electrostatic attraction between Mg²⁺ ions and delocalised electrons gives a high melting point (~650 °C). The presence of mobile delocalised electrons makes magnesium a good electrical and thermal conductor, and the layered cation arrangement makes it malleable and ductile.
Examiner commentary: Full marks (9/9). Part (a) shows the weighted-mean expression explicitly before substituting — examiners reward the structural step. The answer is given to the requested precision (2 d.p.) without premature rounding. Part (b) identifies Mg correctly from the Aᵣ value. Part (c) is a synoptic link to bonding: the candidate gives the electron configuration, the cation formed, the structure (cations + delocalised electrons), and three properties tied to that structure (high m.p., conductivity, malleability). This earns full marks because each property is causally derived from the bonding model, not just listed.
Confusing mass number with relative atomic mass. Mass number is an integer (sum of protons + neutrons in one specific isotope); Aᵣ is the abundance-weighted mean, almost always non-integer. Writing "Aᵣ(Cl) = 35" is a Grade C error.
Treating isotopes as different elements. Same proton number defines the element. Different neutron numbers give different isotopes, but they share electron configuration and chemistry.
Attributing chemistry to mass. Reactivity is determined by electron configuration, not mass. ¹H, ²H (deuterium) and ³H (tritium) are chemically nearly identical; their bonds vibrate at slightly different frequencies (kinetic isotope effects) but the chemistry is the same.
Misreading the gold-foil result. It is the small fraction of alpha particles deflected at large angles that disproved the plum pudding — not the majority that passed through. Candidates often invert the logic.
Confusing orbits with orbitals. Orbits (Bohr) are fixed circular paths; orbitals (quantum mechanical) are probability distributions. The shift is conceptual, not just terminological.
Forgetting the carbon-12 reference. Modern Aᵣ is defined relative to 1/12 the mass of a ¹²C atom, not relative to hydrogen (the historical Dalton choice). Omitting the reference loses the B mark.
Charge and mass slips on subatomic-particle tables. Writing "neutron, charge +1" or "electron, mass 1" is a fatal recall error — the particles are routinely tested in 1-mark slots.
Oxbridge interview prompt: "If we discovered tomorrow that protons and neutrons are themselves composed of smaller particles bound by an unknown force, would the periodic table need rewriting? Why or why not?"
The atomic-models content does not map directly to a single Edexcel A-Level Chemistry Core Practical (CP1–CP16), but it underwrites the interpretive scaffolding of several. CP16 (Tests for organic functional groups, including spectroscopy) uses mass spectrometry to identify molecules — the ionisation, acceleration and detection sequence rests on the proton/neutron/electron framework introduced here. CP3 (Reactions of Group 2 elements and compounds) generates patterns of reactivity that ultimately reflect electron configuration trends rooted in the quantum model. When candidates analyse mass spectra in Paper 3, they are applying isotopic-abundance arithmetic developed in this lesson. The takeaway: this lesson is the theoretical chassis on which several CPs depend, even when no benchwork is required for the lesson itself.
This content is aligned with the Pearson Edexcel GCE A Level Chemistry (9CH0) specification, Paper 1 — Advanced Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Topic 1: Atomic Structure and the Periodic Table (sub-topic 1.1, atomic models and subatomic particles). For the most accurate and up-to-date information, please refer to the official Pearson Edexcel specification document.
graph TD
A["Atomic model<br/>development"] --> B["Dalton 1808<br/>indivisible sphere"]
B --> C["Thomson 1897<br/>plum pudding<br/>(electron discovered)"]
C --> D["Rutherford 1911<br/>nuclear atom<br/>(gold foil)"]
D --> E["Bohr 1913<br/>quantised shells<br/>(line spectra)"]
E --> F["Quantum mechanical<br/>orbitals<br/>(Schrödinger 1926)"]
F --> G{"Modern atom"}
G --> H["Nucleus:<br/>protons + neutrons"]
G --> I["Electrons in<br/>orbitals"]
H --> J["Mass number A<br/>= p + n"]
H --> K["Atomic number Z<br/>= p"]
I --> L["Isotopes share<br/>chemistry"]
J --> M["Aᵣ = Σ(mass × abundance)/100"]
style D fill:#e74c3c,color:#fff
style F fill:#27ae60,color:#fff
style M fill:#3498db,color:#fff