You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Giant structures are extended, three-dimensional networks of atoms or ions held together by strong bonds throughout the entire structure. Unlike simple molecular substances, where weak intermolecular forces determine physical properties, the properties of giant structures are governed by the strong bonds within the lattice. This gives them characteristically high melting points and other distinctive properties.
There are two main types: giant ionic lattices and giant covalent structures.
When given data about an unknown substance, use this flowchart to identify the structure type:
flowchart TD
A["Unknown substance"] --> B{"Melting point?"}
B -->|"Low (< ~300°C)"| C["Simple molecular"]
B -->|"High (> ~500°C)"| D{"Conducts electricity as solid?"}
D -->|"Yes"| E{"Malleable?"}
E -->|"Yes"| F["METALLIC"]
E -->|"No (layered conductor)"| G["GIANT COVALENT - Graphite"]
D -->|"No"| H{"Conducts when molten?"}
H -->|"Yes"| I["GIANT IONIC"]
H -->|"No"| J["GIANT COVALENT (e.g. diamond, SiO₂)"]
C --> K{"Polar or H-bonding?"}
K -->|"H bonded to N/O/F"| L["London + dipole + H-bonding"]
K -->|"Polar, no H-bonding"| M["London + dipole-dipole"]
K -->|"Non-polar"| N["London forces only"]
We covered ionic bonding in detail in Lesson 1, but here we revisit the structures with a focus on comparing the two key lattice types.
In sodium chloride:
Caesium chloride has a different structure because Cs⁺ is much larger than Na⁺:
The coordination number depends on the radius ratio — the ratio of the smaller ion to the larger ion. Larger ratios (where the ions are more similar in size) favour higher coordination numbers.
Giant covalent structures (also called network covalent or macromolecular structures) consist of atoms bonded to each other by covalent bonds extending throughout the entire structure. There are no individual molecules — the whole sample is essentially one giant molecule.
Diamond is a form (allotrope) of carbon with the following structure:
Properties of diamond:
Graphite is another allotrope of carbon with a very different structure:
Properties of graphite:
This is a crucial comparison. In diamond, all four outer electrons are localised in C–C sigma bonds — none are free to move. In graphite, each carbon only forms three sigma bonds, leaving one electron per atom delocalised across the layer. These delocalised electrons behave like the free electrons in a metal and can carry electrical charge.
Silicon dioxide (silica) has a giant covalent structure similar to diamond:
Properties:
Silicon dioxide is the main component of sand and quartz.
| Property | Diamond | Graphite | SiO₂ | NaCl | Copper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure type | Giant covalent | Giant covalent (layered) | Giant covalent | Giant ionic | Metallic |
| Melting point / °C | 3550 | 3652 | 1713 | 801 | 1085 |
| Hardness | Very hard | Soft (layers slide) | Hard, brittle | Hard, brittle | Malleable |
| Electrical conductivity | None | Yes (along layers) | None | Molten/dissolved | Yes (solid) |
| Bonding broken on melting | Covalent C–C | Covalent C–C | Covalent Si–O | Ionic | Metallic |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble | Insoluble | Insoluble | Soluble | Insoluble |
| Mobile charge carriers | None | Delocalised e⁻ | None | Ions (when molten) | Delocalised e⁻ |
Graphene is a single layer of graphite — a one-atom-thick sheet of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal pattern. It was first isolated in 2004 and has extraordinary properties:
Applications of graphene include electronics, composite materials, flexible screens, and filtration membranes.
Fullerenes are closed cage-like structures of carbon atoms. The most famous is buckminsterfullerene (C₆₀), which consists of 60 carbon atoms arranged in pentagons and hexagons, like a football (soccer ball).
Carbon nanotubes are cylinders of rolled graphene sheets. They can be single-walled (one layer) or multi-walled (concentric cylinders).
| Allotrope | Bonding per C | Hybridisation | Delocalised e⁻? | Structure type | Conductivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond | 4 C–C | sp³ | No | Giant covalent | None |
| Graphite | 3 C–C (layers) | sp² | Yes (in layers) | Giant covalent (layered) | Along layers |
| Graphene | 3 C–C (sheet) | sp² | Yes (in sheet) | 2D giant covalent | Excellent |
| C₆₀ | 3 C–C (cage) | sp² | Yes (within cage) | Simple molecular | Poor |
| Nanotube | 3 C–C (cylinder) | sp² | Yes (along tube) | Cylindrical | Along tube |
Common exam mistake: Students sometimes say "graphite has weak bonds." This is wrong. Graphite has very strong covalent bonds within its layers. It is the forces between layers that are weak (London forces). The slipperiness and softness are due to the weak interlayer forces, but the very high melting point is due to the strong intralayer covalent bonds that must be broken.
Edexcel 9CH0 specification, Topic 2: Bonding and Structure, sub-topic 2.7 — giant ionic and giant covalent structures. Candidates are required to describe the structures of giant ionic lattices (e.g. NaCl, MgO) and giant covalent solids (diamond, graphite, silicon, silicon dioxide), and to explain physical properties — melting and boiling points, electrical conductivity in solid, molten and aqueous states, hardness, brittleness, and solubility — in terms of the structure and the bonding present.
Cross-paper assessment is unusually heavy here because structure-type reasoning is genuinely synoptic. Paper 1 Topic 4 (periodicity) revisits silicon dioxide on Period 3 — a giant covalent oxide with a very high melting point and effective insolubility in water — alongside the molecular oxides P₄O₁₀ and SO₃. Paper 1 Topic 15 (transition metals) brings back giant covalent and giant ionic motifs in the context of refractory ceramics: tungsten carbide (WC) and titanium carbide (TiC) are giant covalent compounds whose hardness and high melting points are exploited industrially. Paper 3 (synoptic) routinely sets data-response items in which candidates infer structure type from a small table of physical properties — exactly the skill that the worked example below rehearses.
(refer to the official Pearson Edexcel specification document for exact wording).
Question (8 marks):
The table below gives selected physical properties of four substances, A, B, C and D.
| Substance | m.p. / °C | Conducts as solid? | Conducts when molten? | Soluble in water? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 801 | No | Yes | Yes |
| B | 1610 | No | No | No |
| C | 1085 | Yes | Yes | No |
| D | −7 | No | No | No |
Identify each substance as giant ionic, giant covalent, simple molecular, or metallic, and justify each identification using the data. (8)
Solution with mark scheme:
Substance A (m.p. 801 °C, non-conducting solid, conducting melt, water-soluble) — giant ionic.
M1 — recognises that a very high melting point combined with no conduction in the solid state is consistent with a giant ionic lattice rather than a metal. The reasoning must be explicit: "the very high melting point is due to strong electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions throughout the lattice, which requires a large amount of energy to overcome." Bare statement that "it's ionic because it dissolves" earns nothing.
A1 — explains conduction in the melt and aqueous solution by reference to mobile ions that are free to move and carry charge once the lattice has been disrupted. The candidate must connect why solid ionic compounds do not conduct (ions held in fixed positions by the lattice) with why the melt does (ions free to move).
Substance B (m.p. 1610 °C, non-conducting throughout, water-insoluble) — giant covalent.
M1 — identifies that a very high melting point with no electrical conductivity in any state and no water solubility points to a giant covalent network with no mobile charge carriers. Examples worth naming include silicon dioxide and diamond.
A1 — explains that to melt the substance many strong covalent bonds throughout the entire structure must be broken, and that there are no charged particles or delocalised electrons available to conduct electricity.
Substance C (m.p. 1085 °C, conducting in both solid and molten states, water-insoluble) — metallic.
M1 — recognises that conduction in the solid state is a fingerprint of metallic bonding (or, much more rarely, graphite — but graphite is layered and behaves differently in other respects).
A1 — attributes solid-state conductivity to delocalised electrons free to move throughout the lattice of positive metal ions, and notes that metals are typically insoluble in water because there is no favourable energy pathway to break apart the metallic lattice into hydrated species.
Substance D (m.p. −7 °C, non-conducting throughout, water-insoluble) — simple molecular.
M1 — recognises that a low melting point indicates that only weak intermolecular forces are being overcome on melting, not strong covalent or ionic bonds.
A1 — connects the absence of conductivity to the absence of mobile ions or delocalised electrons, and the limited water solubility to the non-polar (or weakly polar) nature of typical simple molecular substances.
Total: 8 marks (4 × M1 A1). Each identification requires both the correct label and a property-grounded reason. Bare labels score zero.
Question (6 marks): Diamond and graphite are both pure carbon, yet diamond is one of the hardest known substances and a poor electrical conductor, while graphite is soft and conducts electricity along its layers. Compare and contrast the structures and bonding of diamond and graphite, and use these differences to explain the physical properties described. (6)
Mark scheme decomposition by AO:
Total: 6 marks split AO1 = 3, AO2 = 3. This is a balanced AO1/AO2 question — half the marks reward recall of the structural facts, half reward the explanatory step that links structure to property. Candidates who write "diamond has covalent bonds and graphite has covalent bonds" without distinguishing the two architectures cap at 1 or 2 marks.
Connects to:
Topic 1 — atomic structure and the periodic table. The bonding capacity of an atom is set by its number of valence electrons. Carbon and silicon both sit in Group 14 with four valence electrons, and both can form four equivalent covalent bonds in tetrahedral arrangements — which is why both are capable of giant covalent networks (diamond and silicon respectively). Phosphorus, sulfur and chlorine, with five, six and seven valence electrons, do not form four equivalent bonds and so do not generate analogous three-dimensional networks; they prefer molecular allotropes such as P₄, S₈ and Cl₂.
Topic 4 — periodicity (Period 3 oxides). SiO₂ is giant covalent, with each Si bonded to four O and each O bridging two Si in a three-dimensional network. P₄O₁₀ and SO₃ are simple molecular oxides. The contrast — same period, neighbouring elements, very different oxide structure types — is precisely the diagnostic that periodicity questions exploit when they ask candidates to compare melting points across a row of oxides.
Topic 8 — energetics (Born–Haber cycles). The lattice energy of a giant ionic compound is the energy released when one mole of the solid forms from gaseous ions. Born–Haber cycles allow lattice energies to be calculated indirectly from enthalpies of atomisation, ionisation, electron affinity and formation. Trends in lattice energy across a series (e.g. NaF → NaCl → NaBr → NaI) illuminate why melting points of giant ionic solids fall as anion radius increases.
Topic 15 — transition metals. Several transition metal oxides (TiO₂, Al₂O₃, Cr₂O₃) and carbides (TiC, WC) form giant ionic or giant covalent networks. Their extreme hardness and very high melting points make them industrially important refractory ceramics, used in cutting tools and high-temperature furnaces. The same structural reasoning that explains diamond's hardness explains tungsten carbide's.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.