You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Data analysis questions test your ability to extract information from graphs, tables, and experimental results. These questions appear in all three papers and carry significant marks. This lesson covers how to read every type of graph you will encounter, interpret tables accurately, plot data correctly, and handle spectral data systematically.
When given a concentration-time graph, the rate at any point is the gradient of the tangent at that point. To find the initial rate, draw a tangent at t = 0. Common errors include drawing the tangent too steeply or too shallowly, or measuring the gradient incorrectly.
To find the gradient:
Worked Example: A concentration-time graph shows [A] decreasing. At t = 20 s, you draw a tangent. Two points on the tangent are (10, 0.80) and (40, 0.20). Gradient = (0.20 - 0.80) / (40 - 10) = -0.60 / 30 = -0.020 mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹ Rate = 0.020 mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹ (rate is positive by convention)
Common mistake: Using points on the curve itself rather than points on the tangent line. The tangent is a straight line that touches the curve at one point — the gradient of this line gives the rate.
| Graph type | Straight line means | Order |
|---|---|---|
| [A] vs time | Constant rate of decrease | Zero order |
| ln[A] vs time | Straight line with negative gradient | First order |
| 1/[A] vs time | Straight line with positive gradient | Second order |
Worked Example: If plotting ln[A] against time gives a straight line, the reaction is first order with respect to A. The gradient equals -k (the rate constant), and the y-intercept equals ln[A]₀.
When asked to determine order from initial rate data:
| Observation | Order |
|---|---|
| Doubling [A] has no effect on rate | Zero order |
| Doubling [A] doubles the rate | First order |
| Doubling [A] quadruples the rate | Second order |
Titration curves show pH against volume of titrant added. Key features to identify:
graph TD
A[Identify the type of titration] --> B{What is the initial pH?}
B -->|pH ~1| C[Strong acid being titrated]
B -->|pH ~3-4| D[Weak acid being titrated]
B -->|pH ~13| E[Strong base being titrated]
B -->|pH ~10-11| F[Weak base being titrated]
C --> G[Equivalence point at pH 7]
D --> H[Equivalence point above pH 7]
E --> I[Equivalence point at pH 7]
F --> J[Equivalence point below pH 7]
G --> K[Use any indicator]
H --> L[Use phenolphthalein]
I --> M[Use any indicator]
J --> N[Use methyl orange]
| Feature | How to find it | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Equivalence point | Steepest section — midpoint of vertical region | Volume needed for complete neutralisation |
| Half-equivalence point | Half the equivalence volume | pH = pKa at this point |
| Buffer region | Flat section before equivalence | Where the solution resists pH change |
| Indicator range | Must span the steep section | Suitable indicator for this titration |
Energy profile diagrams show the energy of reactants and products. Key readings:
Worked Example: An energy profile shows reactants at 100 kJ, products at 40 kJ, and the peak at 180 kJ. Ea = 180 - 100 = 80 kJ ΔH = 40 - 100 = -60 kJ (exothermic)
When asked to describe or explain trends from a table:
Worked Example: A table shows melting points: Na 98°C, Mg 650°C, Al 660°C, Si 1414°C, P 44°C, S 115°C, Cl -101°C, Ar -189°C.
Describe: "Melting point increases from Na (98°C) to Si (1414°C), then decreases sharply from P (44°C) to Ar (-189°C)."
Explain: "Na to Al are metals with metallic bonding — melting point increases as charge density increases (Na⁺ to Al³⁺), strengthening the metallic bond. Si has a giant covalent structure requiring much energy to break its strong covalent bonds. P₄, S₈, Cl₂, and Ar have simple molecular structures with weak van der Waals forces, so melting points are low."
Key principle: Always quote numbers from the data. "The melting point increases" is weaker than "the melting point increases from 98°C to 660°C."
If asked to plot data:
| Mistake | Why it loses marks | Correct approach |
|---|---|---|
| Awkward scales (e.g., 3s or 7s) | Hard to read intermediate values | Use 1, 2, 5, or 10 per division |
| Data fills only a small area | Reduces resolution | Choose scales so data uses >50% of paper |
| Joining dots with straight lines | Not a line of best fit | Draw a smooth curve or best-fit straight line |
| No axis labels or units | Cannot interpret the graph | Always include "quantity / unit" |
| Plotting dots instead of crosses | Harder to see precise position | Use × for each data point |
Use precise language:
Precision matters: "There is a positive correlation between temperature and rate" is acceptable but weak. "Rate approximately doubles for every 10°C increase in temperature" is much stronger because it quantifies the relationship.
Key absorptions to memorise:
| Absorption (cm⁻¹) | Bond | Appearance | Found in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3200-3600 | O-H (alcohol) | Broad | Alcohols, phenols |
| 2500-3300 | O-H (acid) | Very broad | Carboxylic acids |
| 1700-1750 | C=O | Sharp, strong | Aldehydes, ketones, acids, esters |
| 3300-3500 | N-H | Medium, 2 peaks for NH₂ | Amines, amides |
| 2850-3000 | C-H | Medium | Most organic compounds |
Worked Example: M⁺ at m/z = 74, peak at m/z = 45 (loss of 29 = CHO), peak at m/z = 29 (CHO⁺). Molecular formula could be C₃H₆O₂. The CHO loss suggests an ester or carboxylic acid. With M = 74, this is methyl ethanoate (CH₃COOCH₃) or propanoic acid (CH₃CH₂COOH).
¹H NMR:
¹³C NMR:
graph TD
A[Start with mass spectrum] --> B[Find M⁺ → molecular mass]
B --> C[Calculate molecular formula from M_r]
C --> D[Calculate degrees of unsaturation]
D --> E[Check IR spectrum]
E --> F[Identify functional groups from absorptions]
F --> G[Check ¹H NMR]
G --> H[Count H environments from number of peaks]
H --> I[Determine integration ratios]
I --> J[Analyse splitting patterns]
J --> K[Check ¹³C NMR for carbon environments]
K --> L[Propose a structure consistent with all data]
L --> M[Verify: does the structure explain all peaks?]
Worked Example: A compound has M⁺ = 60, a broad IR absorption at 2500-3300 cm⁻¹ and a sharp absorption at 1710 cm⁻¹. The ¹H NMR shows two peaks: a quartet at δ 2.4 and a triplet at δ 1.2 with integration ratio 2:3.
Analysis: M = 60, broad O-H + C=O suggests carboxylic acid. Molecular formula C₂H₄O₂ = 60 (but this is ethanoic acid with M = 60 and would show a singlet). Try C₃H₈... No, with COOH we need C₃H₆O₂ = 74... Actually M = 60 with COOH: CHO₂ = 45, leaving 15 = CH₃. So CH₃COOH (ethanoic acid, M = 60). But the NMR shows two environments with splitting...
Reconsider: M = 60, the quartet-triplet pattern with 2:3 ratio suggests CH₂CH₃. If CH₃CH₂COOH = propanoic acid, M = 74. This does not match. With M = 60 and the acid group: this is propan-1-ol? No. Let me re-examine: CH₃COOH (M=60), with ¹H NMR showing a singlet for CH₃ and a broad singlet for OH. The question must refer to a different compound.
This worked example demonstrates the iterative process — when data conflicts, re-examine your assumptions. The exam expects you to work through this systematically.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.