You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson examines how diversity is managed at local and national level in the UK, including policies, strategies and debates about integration, multiculturalism and community cohesion. It addresses the Edexcel A-Level Geography Paper 2 (9GE0) Enquiry Question: "How successfully are cultural and demographic issues managed?"
Managing diversity is one of the great challenges of modern governance. How can a society ensure that people from different ethnic, religious, linguistic and cultural backgrounds can live together peacefully, productively and fairly? This lesson examines the different approaches the UK has taken and evaluates their success.
The most fundamental debate in diversity management is between two competing philosophies:
| Approach | Definition | Key Features | Critique |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiculturalism | Recognition and celebration of cultural difference within a shared political framework | Supports community languages, cultural practices, faith schools; values diversity as inherent good | Accused of encouraging "parallel lives"; may not promote shared values; can lead to relativism |
| Assimilation | Expectation that minorities adopt the culture, language and values of the host society | Emphasises shared national identity, common language, integration into mainstream institutions | Accused of cultural imperialism; ignores structural racism; places burden on minorities |
| Integration | A middle path: shared civic values alongside respect for cultural diversity | Mutual adaptation — both majority and minorities change; emphasis on participation and interaction | Often vague in practice; difficult to define or measure; can mean different things to different people |
graph LR
A["Assimilation<br/>(Minorities adopt<br/>majority culture)"] --- B["Integration<br/>(Mutual adaptation;<br/>shared values +<br/>cultural diversity)"] --- C["Multiculturalism<br/>(Cultural difference<br/>celebrated and<br/>maintained)"]
B --> D["UK policy has moved<br/>along this spectrum<br/>over time"]
| Period | Approach | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| 1960s–1970s | Assimilationist | Expectation that immigrants would adopt British culture and become invisible. Little support for cultural maintenance |
| 1980s–1990s | Multicultural | Recognition of cultural diversity; funding for community organisations; anti-discrimination legislation; celebration of difference |
| 2001–2010 | Community cohesion | Shift after 2001 riots; emphasis on shared values, interaction, and common belonging alongside respect for diversity |
| 2010–2016 | Muscular liberalism | David Cameron declared multiculturalism had "failed" (Munich speech, 2011); emphasis on British values; Prevent strategy targeting extremism |
| 2016–present | Integration + hostile environment | Post-Brexit emphasis on controlling immigration; "hostile environment" policy for illegal immigrants; integration strategy (2018); debate continues |
The Equality Act 2010 is the cornerstone of UK anti-discrimination law:
Prevent is the UK government's counter-radicalisation strategy, part of the broader CONTEST counter-terrorism framework:
The government's Integrated Communities Strategy Green Paper (2018) outlined five priorities:
The strategy was welcomed in principle but criticised for:
Exam Tip: When discussing national policy, always evaluate its effectiveness and fairness. Who does the policy benefit? Who does it disadvantage? Is it based on evidence? Has it achieved its aims? This evaluative approach is essential for higher-level marks.
Local authorities play a crucial role in managing diversity on the ground:
Following the 2001 Cantle Report, local authorities in diverse areas developed community cohesion strategies aimed at:
Bradford is one of the most significant case studies for diversity management in the UK:
Context:
Management strategies:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.