You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson examines the environmental consequences of globalisation — including the carbon footprint of global trade, deforestation, pollution, e-waste and the challenges of governing the global commons. It addresses the Edexcel Enquiry Question: "What are the consequences of globalisation for countries and different groups of people?"
Globalisation has increased the scale, speed and complexity of human impacts on the environment. The relationship between globalisation and environmental change operates through several mechanisms:
| Mechanism | Environmental Impact |
|---|---|
| Increased trade | More goods transported over longer distances → higher carbon emissions from shipping, aviation and road freight |
| Global shift | Manufacturing relocated to countries with weaker environmental regulations → "pollution havens" |
| Consumer demand | Globalisation creates demand for products (palm oil, soy, beef, minerals) that drive deforestation and habitat destruction |
| Resource extraction | Global commodity markets drive mining, drilling and logging in environmentally sensitive areas |
| Urbanisation | Globalisation-driven rural-urban migration creates mega-cities with air pollution, waste management and water quality challenges |
| Technology | Can both increase environmental damage (more production) and reduce it (cleaner technologies, monitoring) |
The transport of goods across the globe generates significant greenhouse gas emissions:
| Transport Mode | Share of Global Trade (by volume) | CO₂ Emissions per Tonne-km | Key Goods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maritime shipping | ~80% | 8–16 g CO₂ per tonne-km | Containers, oil, gas, bulk commodities |
| Road freight | Variable (domestic/regional) | 60–150 g CO₂ per tonne-km | All types; last-mile delivery |
| Rail freight | ~8% (by volume) | 20–30 g CO₂ per tonne-km | Bulk commodities, containers |
| Air freight | ~1% (by volume) but ~35% by value | 500–1,000 g CO₂ per tonne-km | High-value, perishable, time-sensitive goods |
Food miles refers to the distance food travels from production to consumption:
| Product | Origin | Destination | Air Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green beans | Kenya | UK | ~6,800 km |
| Avocados | Peru | UK | ~10,200 km |
| Lamb | New Zealand | UK | ~18,800 km |
| Blueberries | Chile | UK | ~11,700 km |
However, the food miles concept is misleading as a simple measure of environmental impact:
Exam Tip: Food miles is a good example of how a seemingly straightforward environmental concept is actually complex and contested. In exam answers, show that you understand this complexity — the environmental impact of food depends on production methods, transport mode, seasonality and storage, not just distance. This nuanced analysis earns high marks.
Globalisation drives deforestation through global demand for agricultural commodities:
The pollution havens hypothesis suggests that TNCs relocate pollution-intensive production to countries with weaker environmental regulations — effectively "exporting" pollution from HICs to LICs and NEEs.
| Example | Detail |
|---|---|
| China's air pollution | Rapid industrialisation driven by export manufacturing has made China the world's largest CO₂ emitter (30% of global total); severe urban air pollution in industrial cities |
| Ship-breaking | End-of-life ships from around the world are dismantled on beaches in Bangladesh (Chittagong), India (Alang) and Pakistan (Gadani) — workers exposed to asbestos, heavy metals and toxic chemicals with minimal protective equipment |
| Textile dyeing | Garment factories in Bangladesh discharge toxic dyes into rivers — the Buriganga River near Dhaka is heavily polluted |
| Mining | Gold mining in DRC and Ghana uses mercury, polluting rivers and soil; cobalt mining in DRC involves child labour and environmental contamination |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.