You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson examines the international framework for human rights, beginning with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and extending to the broader architecture of rights conventions, categories and debates. It addresses the Edexcel Enquiry Question: "What are human rights and how do they promote development?" This is a pivotal lesson because it establishes the normative framework against which all subsequent discussions of violations, inequality and intervention are assessed.
The concept of human rights has deep philosophical roots — in Enlightenment ideas of natural rights (Locke, Rousseau, Kant), the English Bill of Rights (1689), the French Declaration of the Rights of Man (1789), the US Bill of Rights (1791) and the abolition of slavery. The Magna Carta (1215), while not a human rights document in the modern sense, established the principle that even monarchs were subject to the rule of law.
However, the modern international human rights system was born from the specific horrors of the Second World War. The scale of atrocity — the Holocaust (approximately 6 million Jews murdered), the Romani genocide (up to 500,000 killed), the mass murder of disabled people (over 200,000 killed in the T4 programme), millions killed in Japanese war crimes in Asia, and the broader devastation of a war that killed approximately 70–85 million people — created an unprecedented political will to establish a universal standard for the treatment of all human beings.
The Nuremberg Trials (1945–1946) established two crucial principles: first, that individuals — including heads of state and senior officials — could be held personally accountable for crimes against humanity; and second, that "following orders" was not an acceptable defence for atrocities. These principles remain the foundation of international criminal law.
The UDHR was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948 (now celebrated as Human Rights Day) at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris. It was drafted by a committee chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt (widow of US President Franklin D. Roosevelt and a tireless advocate for social justice) and included representatives from diverse cultural and philosophical backgrounds:
The UDHR contains 30 articles covering a comprehensive range of rights. It was adopted by 48 votes to 0, with 8 abstentions (the Soviet bloc — USSR, Ukraine, Belarus, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Yugoslavia — plus South Africa and Saudi Arabia). The Soviet bloc abstained because the UDHR did not give sufficient weight to economic and social rights; South Africa abstained because the UDHR's equality provisions threatened apartheid; and Saudi Arabia objected to provisions on religious freedom and equal marriage rights.
| Article | Right | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights | Foundational principle of universality and equality |
| 2 | Freedom from discrimination (race, colour, sex, language, religion, etc.) | Basis for all anti-discrimination law |
| 3 | Right to life, liberty and security | Foundation of criminal justice standards |
| 4 | Freedom from slavery | Absolute right — no exceptions permitted |
| 5 | Freedom from torture | Absolute right — no exceptions permitted, even in wartime |
| 13 | Freedom of movement (within and between countries) | Right to leave any country and return to one's own |
| 14 | Right to seek asylum from persecution | Foundation of international refugee law |
| 18 | Freedom of thought, conscience and religion | Protects belief and non-belief equally |
| 19 | Freedom of opinion and expression | Foundation for press freedom and free speech |
| 21 | Right to participate in government; universal suffrage | Basis for democratic participation |
| 23 | Right to work, free choice of employment, fair wages | Economic rights — often contested |
| 25 | Right to an adequate standard of living (food, housing, healthcare, social security) | Economic/social rights |
| 26 | Right to education (free and compulsory at primary level) | Education as a human right |
The UDHR is a declaration, not a legally binding treaty. It was intended as "a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations." However, its provisions have become so widely accepted that many are now considered customary international law — binding on all states regardless of whether they have signed specific treaties.
Exam Tip: You do not need to memorise all 30 articles, but you should know the key ones (listed above) and be able to give specific examples of how they are protected or violated. Always cite the article number when referencing a specific right — this demonstrates precision and earns credit.
Human rights are traditionally classified into three categories, sometimes called "generations" of rights (a framework proposed by Czech-French jurist Karel Vasak in 1979):
These protect individual freedoms from state interference:
These rights are enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), which entered into force in 1976 and has been ratified by 173 states (2024). They are sometimes called "negative rights" because they require the state to refrain from action (not to torture, not to censor, not to imprison arbitrarily).
These require positive action by the state to provide:
These are enshrined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966), ratified by 171 states. They are "positive rights" because they require the state to actively provide services and resources. These rights are more controversial because they raise questions about a state's economic capacity — can a LIC be held to the same standards of healthcare and education provision as a HIC? The ICESCR addresses this through the concept of "progressive realisation" — states must take steps to achieve these rights to the maximum of their available resources.
The distinction between first and second generation rights is politically significant. During the Cold War, Western capitalist states emphasised civil and political rights (freedom of speech, democracy, fair trials) while communist states emphasised economic and social rights (employment, housing, healthcare, education). Each side accused the other of violating the category of rights it de-emphasised.
These are more recent and more contested:
These are less formally codified but are increasingly recognised in international law, including the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) and the recognition of the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment by the UN General Assembly in 2022 (with 161 votes in favour). The right to development was recognised in the UN Declaration on the Right to Development (1986), which defined development as "an inalienable human right."
graph TB
A["HUMAN RIGHTS<br/>FRAMEWORK"] --> B["First Generation<br/>CIVIL & POLITICAL<br/>Freedom FROM state action<br/>(negative rights)"]
A --> C["Second Generation<br/>ECONOMIC, SOCIAL<br/>& CULTURAL<br/>Right TO provision<br/>(positive rights)"]
A --> D["Third Generation<br/>COLLECTIVE /<br/>SOLIDARITY<br/>Group rights, self-<br/>determination, environment"]
B --> B1["ICCPR 1966<br/>173 states parties"]
C --> C1["ICESCR 1966<br/>171 states parties"]
D --> D1["Various declarations<br/>and conventions"]
style A fill:#1565c0,color:#fff
style B fill:#c62828,color:#fff
style C fill:#2e7d32,color:#fff
style D fill:#6a1b9a,color:#fff
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.