You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Between 20 March and late June 2010, the Eyjafjallajökull (pronounced roughly "AY-ya-fyat-la-yoh-kutl") volcano in southern Iceland erupted, producing lava flows, jökulhlaups and — most consequentially — an ash plume that caused the largest disruption to European airspace since the Second World War. This case study demonstrates that volcanic hazards can have impacts at scales far beyond the local eruption site. It addresses Edexcel A-Level Geography Enquiry Question 2 (EQ2): Why do some tectonic hazards develop into disasters?
Iceland occupies a unique tectonic position — it sits on both the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (a divergent plate boundary) and a mantle plume (hotspot). This dual tectonic setting produces exceptionally high rates of volcanic activity.
| Tectonic Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Plate boundary | Divergent — North American and Eurasian plates moving apart at ~2.5 cm/year |
| Hotspot | Iceland hotspot (mantle plume) beneath the Mid-Atlantic Ridge |
| Volcano type | Stratovolcano (composite), partially covered by Eyjafjallajökull ice cap (~200 m thick) |
| Summit elevation | 1,651 m |
| Ice cap area | ~100 km² |
| Previous eruptions | 920 CE, 1612 CE, 1821–1823 (14-month eruption) |
| Magma type | Initial: basaltic; later: intermediate (trachyandesitic) |
Eyjafjallajökull is closely linked to the much larger and more dangerous Katla volcano, located 25 km to the east. Historically, eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull have been followed by eruptions of Katla (this pattern held in 920 and 1612, though Katla did not erupt after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull event).
The eruption occurred in two distinct phases:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Location | Fimmvörðuháls pass, between Eyjafjallajökull and Mýrdalsjökull ice caps (not beneath the glacier) |
| Eruption style | Effusive — basaltic lava flows and fire fountains |
| Lava composition | Basaltic (low silica, low viscosity) |
| Hazards | Localised lava flows; no significant ash; hiking trails closed |
| Impact | Minimal — attracted tourists ("volcano tourism") |
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Location | Summit caldera, beneath the Eyjafjallajökull ice cap |
| Eruption style | Explosive — phreatomagmatic (magma-ice interaction) |
| Lava composition | Trachyandesitic (intermediate silica, higher viscosity) |
| VEI | 4 (Cataclysmic) |
| Ash plume height | Up to 9–11 km (reaching the tropopause and lower stratosphere) |
| Ash production | ~250 million m³ of tephra |
| Duration | ~6 weeks of significant eruption; intermittent activity until late June |
The transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2 was critical. When the eruption migrated to the summit caldera beneath the ice cap, meltwater flooded into the vent, causing phreatomagmatic explosions — violent interactions between magma and water that fragment the magma into extremely fine-grained ash particles (< 0.1 mm). This fine ash remained suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, creating the aviation hazard.
graph TD
A["Magma rises to summit"] --> B["Encounters 200m thick ice cap"]
B --> C["Rapid ice melting"]
C --> D["Meltwater enters vent"]
D --> E["Phreatomagmatic explosions"]
E --> F["Fine-grained ash plume<br/>rises to 9–11 km"]
E --> G["Jökulhlaups<br/>(glacial outburst floods)"]
F --> H["SE winds carry ash<br/>over Europe"]
G --> I["Flooding of Markarfljót river<br/>800+ evacuated"]
Exam Tip: The reason the Eyjafjallajökull eruption was so disruptive was not its magnitude (VEI 4 is moderate) but the combination of factors: (1) intermediate magma composition producing fine ash; (2) ice-magma interaction creating phreatomagmatic fragmentation; (3) wind direction carrying ash southeast directly over Europe's busiest airspace; and (4) the eruption's multi-week duration. Always emphasise this combination in exam answers.
The melting of the ice cap produced jökulhlaups that flooded the Markarfljót river system:
| Flood Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Peak discharge | ~3,000 m³/s (compared to normal flow of ~50 m³/s) |
| Evacuations | ~800 people evacuated from farms in the Markarfljót floodplain |
| Damage | Roads and bridges damaged; farmland flooded; no deaths |
| Response | Civil Protection Agency ordered pre-emptive evacuation based on monitoring data; all evacuees returned within days |
The successful evacuation was attributed to Iceland's extensive monitoring network and well-rehearsed emergency procedures. The Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO) had been monitoring increased seismicity and GPS-measured ground deformation since early 2010, providing advance warning.
| Impact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Ash fall | Up to 20 cm of ash fell on farms within 20 km of the volcano |
| Livestock | Animals exposed to fluorine-contaminated ash; animals brought indoors; supplementary feeding required |
| Water contamination | Surface water contaminated by ash; groundwater unaffected |
| Pasture | Contaminated; livestock could not graze for several weeks |
| Crop damage | Limited (eruption occurred before main growing season) |
| Long-term | Ash improved soil fertility once incorporated; pasture recovered within one growing season |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.