You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The years from the last phase of Henry VIII's reign to the accession of Elizabeth I in 1558 tested the Tudor state as never before. This is the period long dismissed as the troubled trough of the century — a "mid-Tudor crisis" of weak or unconventional rulers, factional government, lurching religious reversals, economic distress, and serious popular rebellion. It opens with the ageing Henry's final years, in which power was already passing to the factions that jostled around the boy who would succeed him; it runs through the minority of Edward VI, a boy of nine who never reached his majority and died at fifteen, and the reign of Mary I, England's first crowned queen regnant, whose Catholic restoration and burning of Protestants earned her the enduring soubriquet "Bloody Mary." Real power lay first with two successive quasi-regents — the Dukes of Somerset and Northumberland — and the period saw the state religion swing from the conservative Catholicism of Henry's last years, to the radical Protestantism of Edward's, to the restored Roman Catholicism of Mary's.
For this course, the period is where the authority and religion threads are stress-tested together. Can royal authority survive a minority and a female succession? Can the machinery of government continue to function through violent religious reversal? Whether "crisis" is even the right word is one of the most important interpretive questions in the whole option — and exactly the kind of disagreement Section C rewards you for weighing. An older view (associated with W.R.D. Jones) saw a near-systemic breakdown. A powerful revisionist current — Jennifer Loach, Robert Tittler, David Loades — has argued that the institutions of government continued to function, that both the Edwardian and Marian regimes pursued genuine and competent reform, and that the orderly succession of three monarchs in eleven years is hardly the mark of a state in collapse.
The organising question is whether the mid-Tudor period was a genuine "crisis" — a systemic failure of government, religion, economy, and foreign policy — or a difficult but ultimately survivable interlude in which the Tudor state, far from breaking down, proved its resilience and even laid constructive foundations for the Elizabethan age. Keeping that question in view turns the lesson from a chronicle of two reigns into an argument about the strength of the Tudor polity.
This lesson belongs to Edexcel 9HI0 Paper 1, Option 1B (Route B): "England, 1509–1603: authority, nation and religion" — a breadth study assessed by extended analytical essays (Sections A and B) and by the evaluation of historians' interpretations (Section C). Within our teaching sequence it is the pivot of the course: it carries the authority thread of Lesson 1 and the religion thread of Lesson 2 through their severest test and sets up the Elizabethan settlement of Lessons 4–6.
Because Paper 1 is a breadth paper, examiners reward command of change over time and judgements about the degree and permanence of instability, not narrow narrative of either reign. (For the exact assessment weightings and question wording, consult the official Edexcel specification and sample assessment materials rather than any paraphrase.)
The "mid-Tudor" instability did not begin at Henry's death; it was already incubating in his final years. After Cromwell's fall in 1540 the king governed through a balance of factions rather than a single dominant minister, and the central political question became who would control the government of the child, Prince Edward, when the old king died. A conservative faction around the Duke of Norfolk and Bishop Stephen Gardiner contended with a reforming faction associated with the Seymours (Edward's maternal relatives) and Archbishop Cranmer. In the very last weeks of the reign the reformers triumphed: Norfolk was attainted and his son, the Earl of Surrey, executed, while Henry's will established a Regency Council of sixteen intended to govern collectively during the minority.
That arrangement mattered enormously for what followed, because it was almost immediately overturned. Henry's will also empowered the executors to make grants and honours as if the king himself had commanded them (the so-called "unfulfilled gifts" clause), which the Seymour faction exploited to reward themselves and cement control. The result was that the carefully balanced conciliar regency Henry intended collapsed within days of his death into the personal ascendancy of one man — a first illustration of how fragile even a well-laid succession arrangement could prove. Henry died on 28 January 1547, leaving a nine-year-old heir, an unsettled and only half-reformed Church, a treasury drained by the wars and coinage debasements of the 1540s, and a nobility freshly divided by faction. The stage for a decade of instability was set before Edward was crowned.
Edward VI was nine years old at his accession. Within days the king's maternal uncle, Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford, had outmanoeuvred his colleagues, secured the title Duke of Somerset and Lord Protector, and concentrated power in his own hands — precisely the outcome Henry's balanced council had been designed to prevent.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Title and position | Lord Protector of the Realm and Governor of the King's Person; he increasingly bypassed the Council and ruled through his own household, alienating fellow councillors |
| Character | Idealistic but high-handed, arrogant, and politically maladroit; styled himself the "Good Duke," a champion of the poor |
| Scottish policy | Won the Battle of Pinkie (10 September 1547), but the attempt to garrison Scotland and force the marriage of Edward to Mary Queen of Scots (the "Rough Wooing") was ruinously expensive and counter-productive — it drove the Scots into the arms of France, who took the infant Mary to be raised there as bride to the Dauphin |
| Religious policy | A cautious but real move toward Protestantism |
| Social policy | Genuine sympathy for the rural poor; he backed enclosure commissions under John Hales (1548–49) — a stance that raised expectations he could not satisfy and arguably encouraged the unrest of 1549 |
The religious changes under Somerset moved the Church decisively, if cautiously, toward reform:
| Reform | Detail |
|---|---|
| Repeal of the Six Articles (1547) | Swept away Henry's conservative heresy legislation, opening the door to reform |
| Chantries Act (1547) | Dissolved the chantries, confiscating endowments funding masses for the dead — both a revenue grab and a doctrinal blow at purgatory |
| First Book of Common Prayer (1549) | Imposed by the Act of Uniformity (1549); replaced the Latin Mass with an English liturgy, largely Cranmer's work, but deliberately ambiguous on the Eucharist to soften the change |
| Clerical marriage permitted (1549) | Reversed the celibacy rule — a clear Protestant reform |
| Removal of images | Injunctions ordered the destruction of "superstitious" images, candles, and ceremonies |
A chantry was an endowment funding a priest to say masses for the souls of the founder and their kin, hastening them through purgatory. Their dissolution under the Chantries Act (1547) was simultaneously a fiscal measure (raising substantial sums, though many endowments also funded schools and almshouses that were lost with them) and a doctrinal one — a public repudiation of purgatory, the theological engine of late-medieval Catholic piety.
The year 1549 brought the twin rebellions that exposed Somerset's weakness and remain the central case study for the causation of rebellion in the Edwardian period. Crucially, the two risings had almost opposite causes — a distinction essays must draw.
The new English liturgy provoked open rebellion in the conservative far South-West. The Prayer Book was imposed on Whitsunday (9 June) 1549; in Cornwall many parishioners spoke Cornish, not English, and across Devon and Cornwall the assault on the Latin Mass and traditional ceremony was bitterly resented. The rebels demanded the restoration of the Latin Mass, the Act of Six Articles, communion in one kind, and traditional ceremonies, famously deriding the new English service as "but like a Christmas game." Perhaps 6,000 rebels besieged Exeter for several weeks before Lord Russell, reinforced by foreign mercenaries, broke the rebellion with thousands killed in the fighting and reprisals. The Western Rising was overwhelmingly religious in motivation — the clearest demonstration that religious change "from above" could provoke violent popular resistance.
Simultaneously, a very different and even larger rebellion erupted in Norfolk under Robert Kett, a prosperous tanner and minor landowner who turned against his own class's abuses. Its causes were overwhelmingly economic and agrarian: enclosure, overstocking of commons, rack-renting, and the abuse of manorial ("foldcourse") rights by landlords. The rising was strikingly orderly — the rebels held their own courts under the "Oak of Reformation," maintained discipline, and sought legal redress and good governance, not the overthrow of the social order. Perhaps 16,000 rebels encamped on Mousehold Heath above Norwich and took the city, issuing the Mousehold Articles (29 articles) demanding curbs on enclosure and gentry exploitation, reform of corrupt local officials, and protection of tenant rights. The Earl of Warwick (John Dudley) crushed the camp at the Battle of Dussindale (August 1549) with professional troops including foreign mercenaries; Kett was hanged at Norwich Castle.
The twin risings of 1549 exposed Somerset's fundamental weakness. His public sympathy for anti-enclosure grievances (the Hales commissions) raised hopes he could not meet and made him appear complicit in disorder, while his slowness to repress alarmed the propertied classes. Diarmaid MacCulloch argues that Somerset's well-meaning populism actively encouraged rebellion by signalling that the regime shared the commons' complaints. It was this loss of elite confidence, more than the rebellions themselves, that brought him down in October 1549.
John Dudley, Earl of Warwick (created Duke of Northumberland in 1551), engineered Somerset's fall and emerged as the effective head of government — a far abler, if less likeable, ruler than his predecessor, and a figure the revisionists have done much to rehabilitate.
| Aspect | Somerset | Northumberland |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Lord Protector | Lord President of the Council — pointedly avoiding the provocative "Protector" and ruling through the Council, restoring at least the form of conciliar government |
| Style | Idealistic, populist, autocratic in practice | Pragmatic, efficient, ruthless, politically astute |
| Finance | Reckless war spending; further debasement of the coinage | Withdrew from the costly Scottish and French wars; began to restore the currency and reform the revenue courts (work that benefited Mary and Elizabeth) |
| Religion | Cautious, incremental Protestantism | More thoroughly and doctrinally Protestant |
| Reputation | Sympathetically remembered as the "Good Duke" | Long vilified as a self-serving villain (the Jane Grey coup) — but substantially rehabilitated by revisionists who credit his administrative competence |
Under Northumberland the Church became, on paper, fully Reformed. The Second Book of Common Prayer (1552) was decisively Protestant: the communion was framed as a memorial, and the so-called Black Rubric denied any "real and essential presence" of Christ's natural body in the sacrament. The Forty-Two Articles (1553), drafted chiefly by Cranmer, were a fully Protestant confession of faith — the doctrinal high-water mark of the English Reformation to date, and later the basis of Elizabeth's Thirty-Nine Articles. A reformed Ordinal (1550) stripped the ordination rite of Catholic sacrificial language, and stone altars were replaced by wooden communion tables. How deeply this had penetrated popular belief in only six years is doubtful — a point the revisionists (Haigh, Duffy) press hard, and which helps explain the relative ease of Mary's Catholic restoration.
As the consumptive Edward VI lay dying in the spring of 1553 (aged fifteen), the Protestant succession itself came into question, since the heir by Henry VIII's will and the Act of Succession was the Catholic Mary. The episode is a superb test of the "crisis" thesis, because its outcome points against systemic breakdown.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Edward's "Devise for the Succession" | The dying king — a sincere and zealous Protestant — drafted a device excluding both his half-sisters (Mary and Elizabeth) as illegitimate, and settling the crown on his cousin Lady Jane Grey, a committed Protestant |
| Northumberland's role | Northumberland married his son Lord Guildford Dudley to Jane and promoted the scheme — but it is now widely accepted that the initiative came substantially from Edward himself, not solely from an ambitious Duke |
| Jane's "reign" | Jane was proclaimed queen on 10 July 1553; her reign lasted just nine days (often counted as thirteen) |
| Mary's response | Mary fled to East Anglia, proclaimed herself queen at Framlingham, and rallied overwhelming support — crucially from Catholics and Protestants who upheld the legitimate Tudor line; the Privy Council promptly defected to her |
| Outcome | Northumberland's support evaporated; he was arrested and executed (August 1553). Jane was initially spared but executed in February 1554 in the aftermath of Wyatt's Rebellion |
The significance of 1553 cuts against the "crisis" thesis: a usurping attempt backed by the head of government collapsed almost bloodlessly because the country rallied to the legitimate heir. Far from demonstrating the fragility of the Tudor state, it demonstrated the strength of dynastic loyalty and the resilience of the succession — an argument to marshal on the "no crisis" side of a Section B essay.
Mary I's reign is among the most fiercely contested in Tudor historiography — caricatured for centuries as a sterile reign of fanatical persecution, but substantially reassessed by modern scholars, which makes it fertile ground for Section C.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.