You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
For two decades after the Berlin Wall went up, the division of Germany looked permanent — two states, two systems, two blocs, frozen in a Cold War stand-off that few expected to end in their lifetimes. Yet within that apparent stasis the ground was shifting. The Federal Republic, under Willy Brandt, abandoned the sterile refusal to recognise the eastern realities and pursued instead a policy of engagement — Ostpolitik — that regularised inner-German relations and, paradoxically, helped create the conditions for the peaceful revolution to come. And in the autumn of 1989 the frozen order dissolved with astonishing speed: the GDR, hollowed out by economic failure and abandoned by its Soviet patron, was swept away by peaceful mass demonstrations, the Berlin Wall fell on 9 November, and within a year a divided nation was reunited. This lesson traces that arc from Ostpolitik through the détente and renewed tension of the 1970s and 1980s to the collapse of 1989 and reunification in 1990. It asks how a division that seemed irreversible came to an end, and whether reunification was an unqualified triumph of democracy and diplomacy or a process whose speed created lasting problems.
For a breadth study running from 1918 to 1989, these decades bring the democracy versus dictatorship thread to its resolution. The "German question" — how to accommodate German power within a stable European order — which the course has traced from the failed settlement of Versailles through the catastrophe of the Nazi bid for European mastery to the Cold War partition, is finally answered by the creation of a single, democratic, fully sovereign Germany embedded in the European Community and NATO. The peaceful triumph of the Federal Republic's liberal-democratic model over the SED dictatorship is the culmination of the whole story: the durable second democracy absorbing the failed second dictatorship, and closing the account opened when the first German democracy collapsed in 1933.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson belongs to Edexcel 9HI0 Paper 1, Option 1G (Route G): "Germany and West Germany, 1918–89" — a breadth study assessed by extended analytical essays (Sections A and B) and by the evaluation of historians' interpretations (Section C). It is the concluding lesson of the course's narrative, resolving the democracy versus dictatorship thread by tracing the road from Ostpolitik to reunification, and it draws together the long-run themes the breadth study has developed since 1918.
Because Paper 1 is a breadth paper, examiners reward command of change over time and judgements about the scale and durability of change. Keep asking how a division that seemed permanent came to an end, how the causes of the collapse related to one another, and how the character of unification shaped the Germany that emerged. (For the precise assessment weightings and question wording, consult the official Edexcel specification and sample assessment materials rather than any paraphrase.)
The election of Willy Brandt (SPD) as Chancellor in 1969, at the head of an SPD–FDP coalition, brought a decisive shift in the Federal Republic's approach to the East. For twenty years, under the Hallstein Doctrine, Bonn had refused to recognise the GDR or to accept the post-war borders, insisting that it alone represented all Germans. Brandt — a former mayor of West Berlin who had watched the Wall go up — judged this rigidity sterile, and pursued instead Ostpolitik ("Eastern policy"): the acceptance of post-war realities as the basis for reducing tension, in the belief, captured in the slogan "change through rapprochement" (Wandel durch Annäherung), that engagement would soften the division more effectively than confrontation.
| Agreement | Date | Substance |
|---|---|---|
| Moscow Treaty | August 1970 | Recognised existing borders and renounced the use of force |
| Warsaw Treaty | December 1970 | Accepted the Oder–Neisse line as Poland's western border; occasion of Brandt's Kniefall at the Warsaw Ghetto memorial |
| Four Power Agreement on Berlin | 1971 | Secured and regularised Western access to West Berlin |
| Basic Treaty | December 1972 | The FRG and GDR recognised each other as separate states, though Bonn declined to treat the GDR as wholly foreign |
| Helsinki Final Act | 1975 | Confirmed European borders but included human-rights provisions later invoked by eastern dissidents |
Brandt's spontaneous kneeling at the Warsaw Ghetto memorial in December 1970 — the Kniefall von Warschau — became a powerful symbol of German contrition and did much to rehabilitate the FRG's moral standing. Ostpolitik was bitterly contested at home: the CDU/CSU opposition denounced it as a betrayal that abandoned the goal of reunification and conceded the permanence of division, and it nearly cost Brandt his chancellorship in a failed vote of no confidence in 1972. Yet its long-run significance was profound and, in a sense its critics did not foresee, favourable to unity. By reducing tension, regularising inner-German relations and — through the Helsinki provisions — giving eastern dissidents a charter of rights to invoke, Ostpolitik helped create the very conditions in which the peaceful unification of 1990 became possible. The paradox is worth pressing: the policy attacked for accepting division may have done more to end it, in the long run, than the confrontational stance it replaced. Détente also, however, cut the other way — the inflow of Western credit and contact that Ostpolitik encouraged became one of the props sustaining the ailing GDR, so that engagement both softened and, for a time, subsidised the dictatorship.
The two decades before the collapse were not static. The détente of the early 1970s gave way, by the decade's end, to renewed Cold War tension — the "Second Cold War" of the early 1980s, triggered by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the crisis over intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Europe, which provoked a large West German peace movement. Within the FRG, Helmut Schmidt (SPD) succeeded Brandt in 1974 and governed as a pragmatic manager of economy and alliance until 1982, when the FDP switched partners and brought Helmut Kohl (CDU) to the chancellorship — the man who would, unexpectedly, lead the country into reunification.
Beneath the surface of the apparently stable two-state order, the GDR was decaying. Honecker's debt-funded "consumer socialism" had raised living standards in the short term but at the cost of an insolvency propped up by Western loans, including the Strauss-brokered credits of 1983. The command economy fell ever further behind the West in productivity, quality and technology; environmental degradation worsened; and the gap between the regime's propaganda of socialist achievement and the shabby reality of shortage and surveillance bred a quiet, pervasive disillusionment. The state's ultimate guarantee remained Soviet power — but that guarantee was about to be withdrawn. The decisive external change came with the accession of Mikhail Gorbachev to the Soviet leadership in 1985 and his reforms of glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring), which not only undermined the ideological foundations of communist rule across the bloc but, crucially, signalled that the USSR would no longer use force to prop up its satellite regimes as it had in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968. This abandonment of the Brezhnev Doctrine removed the ultimate guarantee of the GDR's existence. An ageing, unreforming SED leadership, which pointedly resisted Gorbachev's reforms, now stood exposed: the prop on which the whole edifice had rested since 1953 was being quietly withdrawn.
The GDR's collapse was inseparable from the wider unravelling of the Soviet bloc, and it gathered pace with extraordinary speed once the escape routes opened. In Poland, the Solidarity movement's success in the partly free elections of June 1989 showed that the communist monopoly could be broken; and in May 1989 Hungary began dismantling its border fortifications with Austria, opening an escape route through which GDR citizens began to flee westward in growing numbers.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| May 1989 | Hungary begins dismantling its border with Austria |
| September 1989 | Thousands of GDR citizens flee via Hungary; others occupy West German embassies in Prague and Warsaw |
| 7 October 1989 | The GDR's 40th anniversary; Gorbachev reportedly warns against coming "too late" |
| 9 October 1989 | The Leipzig Monday demonstration: around 70,000 march peacefully and the security forces do not intervene — a decisive turning point |
| 18 October 1989 | Honecker is forced out and replaced by Egon Krenz |
| 4 November 1989 | The largest demonstration in GDR history fills East Berlin's Alexanderplatz |
| 9 November 1989 | The Berlin Wall falls after a confused press conference on new travel rules |
The turning point was Leipzig on 9 October 1989, when around 70,000 people marched peacefully and, decisively, the security forces did not open fire. A violent crackdown remained entirely possible — the "Chinese solution" of Tiananmen, a few months earlier, was openly discussed within the leadership — and its avoidance owed much to the sheer courage of the demonstrators, to divisions and paralysis within the ageing SED leadership, and above all to the absence of Soviet backing for repression. Honecker was forced out on 18 October, but concessions only emboldened the protests. The fall of the Wall on 9 November was, fittingly for so hollow a regime, partly accidental: at an evening press conference the SED spokesman Günter Schabowski announced new travel regulations and, pressed on when they took effect, indicated "immediately" — he had not been fully briefed. Crowds surged to the checkpoints, and the overwhelmed border guards, without clear orders and unwilling to open fire, raised the barriers. The televised scenes of celebration were broadcast worldwide. The manner of the Wall's opening — through confusion and improvisation rather than decision — is itself a fitting emblem of a regime that had lost the capacity to control events.
The fall of the Wall opened, but did not settle, the question of what should follow. Reunification was neither inevitable nor universally desired, and several futures were canvassed: rapid unification (Kohl and most West German politicians, and increasingly the GDR population); a slow, confederal process (some in the SPD and among intellectuals, who feared the destabilising cost of rapid absorption); a reformed, independent GDR pursuing a democratic "third way" (the civic activists of New Forum and writers such as Christa Wolf); and caution or opposition abroad (Margaret Thatcher, and initially François Mitterrand, anxious about the power of a large united Germany). The change of popular mood was captured in the shift of the demonstrators' chant from "Wir sind das Volk" ("We are the people" — a demand for democratic rights) to "Wir sind ein Volk" ("We are one people" — a demand for national unity). The first free Volkskammer elections of March 1990, won decisively by the eastern CDU-led "Alliance for Germany", gave a democratic mandate for rapid unification — a point of real weight for the interpretative debate, since it shows that East Germans themselves chose speed.
Chancellor Helmut Kohl seized the initiative with a Ten-Point Programme for moving towards unity (November 1989), launched without prior consultation of the four occupying powers — a calculated assertion of German initiative. The external dimension was then settled through the Two-Plus-Four negotiations between the two German states and the four wartime Allies (the USA, USSR, UK and France).
| Issue | Resolution |
|---|---|
| Borders | A united Germany recognised the Oder–Neisse line as Poland's permanent western frontier |
| Alliance and forces | United Germany would remain in NATO, with no foreign NATO forces in the former GDR; the Bundeswehr capped at 370,000 |
| Soviet troops | Soviet forces would withdraw from eastern Germany by 1994 |
| Weapons | Germany reaffirmed its renunciation of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons |
| Sovereignty | All four-power occupation rights were terminated and full German sovereignty restored |
The diplomacy was neither swift nor preordained. The decisive obstacle was the Soviet refusal to accept a united Germany inside NATO: for Moscow the GDR was the keystone of the Warsaw Pact and the western anchor of the post-war order. The breakthrough came at the Kohl–Gorbachev meeting in the Caucasus in July 1990, where Gorbachev conceded that a united Germany would be free to choose its own alliance — in practice, NATO. Several factors made this possible: consistent American backing (the administration of George H. W. Bush pressed throughout for full German membership of NATO and worked to make it acceptable to Moscow); the face-saving formula of a Germany in NATO but with no foreign forces or nuclear weapons in the east; substantial German financial assistance for the withdrawal and resettlement of some 380,000 Soviet troops; and the wider dependence of a faltering USSR on Western credit. As Mary Fulbrook observes, the "Two-Plus-Four" framework managed German power without humiliating it — giving the two German states the leading voice while reassuring the four powers — so that unification was achieved by negotiation among allies rather than imposed by victors. The contrast with 1919 and 1945, when German borders and sovereignty were dictated to a defeated nation, is one a strong synoptic answer should draw out: the "German question" was, this time, resolved by consent.
If the diplomacy was a triumph, the economics were a shock whose consequences endured. Kohl pressed for an early currency union, converting the East German Mark to the Deutsche Mark from 1 July 1990 on terms generous to easterners — wages, pensions and rents at 1:1, and savings at 1:1 up to a ceiling. The Bundesbank warned that these rates were economically unjustifiable, since the Ostmark was worth far less at any realistic exchange, but the decision was political: it protected easterners' living standards and bolstered Kohl ahead of the first all-German election. The economic effect, however, was devastating. By converting wages and prices at parity, the currency union overnight raised the cost of eastern labour to roughly four times its realistic market value while opening eastern markets to vastly superior Western goods. Eastern firms thus lost both their cost advantage and their customers at a single stroke — including their own former citizens, who flocked to Western brands. Konrad Jarausch, in The Rush to German Unity (1994), reads this as the price of haste — economically irrational terms accepted because the political logic of the looming election and the fear of continued eastern migration overrode the central bank's warnings. Charles Maier, in Dissolution (1997), frames the same events as the conversion of a hidden, suppressed insolvency into an open one: the GDR economy had long been far weaker than its statistics suggested, and currency union merely revealed, brutally and instantaneously, a bankruptcy concealed for decades.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.