You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
If the New Deal redrew the American Dream to include a role for the state, the Great Society of the 1960s attempted to complete the drawing — to use the full power of the federal government not merely to guarantee security against hardship but to abolish poverty itself and to extend the Dream's promise of opportunity to the Americans it had always excluded. The presidencies of John F. Kennedy (1961-63) and, above all, Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-69) mark the high-water mark of post-war liberalism: the confident belief, inherited from Franklin Roosevelt and pushed to its limit, that an activist national government could remake American society for the better. Medicare and Medicaid, the War on Poverty, federal aid to schools, the reform of immigration, the great civil rights statutes and a wave of environmental and cultural legislation together amounted to the most ambitious use of federal power in the whole period. Yet the same "liberal hour" that produced these lasting achievements also overreached, collided with the cost of the Vietnam War and provoked a white backlash, so that the decade's story is one of liberalism's triumph and the seeds of its own crisis.
For this Edexcel breadth study the Great Society is the climax of the role of government thread that runs the length of the course and the fullest attempt to make the American Dream real for all. It advances the story of federal power to its high tide; it delivers, in Medicare and Medicaid, the largest expansion of the welfare state since the New Deal; and it poses, with unusual sharpness, the central evaluative problem of the whole period — whether the promise of the Dream could be secured by legislation, or whether its soaring ambition was bound to outrun what government could deliver. The analytical task is to hold two truths together: that the Great Society achieved a genuine and durable extension of opportunity and security, and that its overreaching promises, the drain of Vietnam and the backlash it provoked exhausted the very liberalism that produced it.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson belongs to Edexcel 9HI0 Paper 1, Option 1F (Route F): "In search of the American Dream: the USA, c1917-96" — a breadth study assessed by extended analytical essays and by the evaluation of historians' interpretations. Within our own teaching sequence it is the culmination of the role of government thread, drawing together the New Deal welfare state (Lesson 2) and the civil rights legislation (Lesson 5) into the fullest attempt of the whole period to make the Dream a public creation, and setting up the collapse of consensus that follows (Lessons 7 and 8).
Because Paper 1 is a breadth paper, examiners reward command of change over time and judgements that range across the period. Keep asking how far the Great Society extended the reach of the American Dream, and why its ambition proved so hard to sustain. (For precise assessment weightings and question wording, always consult the official Edexcel specification and sample assessment materials rather than any paraphrase.)
John F. Kennedy won the 1960 election by one of the narrowest margins in American history, defeating Vice-President Richard Nixon by roughly 120,000 votes out of nearly 69 million cast. His campaign promised a "New Frontier" of vigour and reform, and his inaugural call — that citizens should ask what they could do for their country — captured a mood of idealistic public purpose. For the American Dream, Kennedy's importance lay less in what he achieved than in what he articulated: a renewed sense that national energy could be harnessed to public ends, from the Peace Corps to the commitment to land a man on the Moon before the decade was out.
Yet Kennedy's domestic record was modest, and the gap between his soaring rhetoric and his limited legislative achievement is the key to understanding it. His narrow mandate and the entrenched conservative coalition of Republicans and Southern Democrats, which had blocked reform in Congress since the late 1930s, defeated most of his major proposals.
| New Frontier initiative | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Federal health insurance for the elderly (later Medicare) | Proposed but defeated in Congress |
| Civil rights legislation | Proposed in June 1963 but stalled; passed under Johnson in 1964 |
| Tax cut to stimulate growth | Proposed but not enacted in his lifetime; passed 1964 |
| Federal aid to education | Blocked, partly over the church-schools question |
| Peace Corps (1961) | Established; sent volunteers to developing countries |
| Minimum wage | Raised from 1.00 to 1.25 dollars an hour |
The historian Robert Dallek, in An Unfinished Life (2003), argues that Kennedy's presidency was marked by a gap between rhetoric and achievement — his domestic agenda was largely stalled — but that his assassination created the political conditions in which his successor could pass what he could not. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas on 22 November 1963; the shock created enormous public sympathy for his agenda and handed Johnson the moral authority and the perishable political capital to enact it as a memorial to the slain president. This is the crucial link: the Great Society was in part the New Frontier redeemed by the martyrdom of the man who had failed to pass it.
Lyndon Johnson was among the most effective legislative politicians in American history. A former Senate Majority Leader with unrivalled command of congressional procedure and of every legislator's interests, he deployed what contemporaries called "the Treatment" — an overwhelming, face-to-face combination of flattery, favours, intimidation and detailed knowledge — to bend Congress to his will. He grasped that the sympathy created by Kennedy's death was perishable and moved with extraordinary speed, framing the anti-poverty and civil rights agenda as the fallen president's legacy.
Johnson set out the vision himself in a speech at the University of Michigan in May 1964, calling for a "Great Society" that would end poverty and racial injustice and enrich the quality of American life — a programme, an act of leadership and a piece of positioning ahead of the coming election all at once. His 1964 landslide over the conservative Republican Barry Goldwater, in which he won over 61 per cent of the popular vote and carried huge Democratic majorities into both houses, gave him, for a brief window, a Congress capable of enacting a programme that the conservative coalition would otherwise have blocked. That window narrowed sharply after the 1966 midterm elections, as backlash and the deepening war eroded his support — which is why the great burst of Great Society legislation is concentrated in the two years 1964-66. For the American Dream, Johnson's ambition was breathtaking: not merely to relieve poverty, as the New Deal had done, but to abolish it, and to open the Dream at last to those the affluent society had left behind.
Johnson declared "unconditional war on poverty" in his first State of the Union address in January 1964, and the Economic Opportunity Act of that year created the machinery to fight it. This was the boldest attempt of the whole period to extend the Dream's promise of opportunity to those excluded from it — not by redistributing wealth, but by equipping the poor to compete.
| War on Poverty programme | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Head Start | Pre-school education for children from low-income families, to break the cycle of poverty early |
| Job Corps | Vocational training for disadvantaged young people |
| VISTA | A domestic Peace Corps, sending volunteers into poor communities |
| Community Action Programme | Empowered local communities to design and run their own anti-poverty projects; the requirement of "maximum feasible participation" proved highly controversial |
| Legal Services | Free legal aid for the poor, giving them standing they had never had |
The philosophy behind the War on Poverty is worth pausing on, because it shaped both its achievements and its limits. Its guiding assumption was that poverty was best attacked not by redistributing income directly but by expanding opportunity — by equipping the poor, especially the young, with the education, training and skills to compete in the affluent economy. This was a characteristically liberal, and characteristically American, way of framing the problem: it sought to open the door to the Dream rather than to guarantee an outcome, and it reflected an optimistic faith that the barriers to opportunity could be dismantled without confronting the structure of the economy itself. That framing was both the programme's strength and its weakness. It commanded broad support precisely because it promised a "hand up, not a hand-out", but it also meant that the War on Poverty never seriously addressed the low wages, job losses and residential segregation that trapped the urban poor, which is one reason poverty proved so stubborn among the minorities the programme was meant to reach. The Community Action Programme proved the most controversial element of all: its requirement of "maximum feasible participation" by the poor themselves was intended to empower communities to design their own solutions, but in practice it frequently set newly organised poor communities against entrenched local political machines, generating conflict that alarmed the very mayors and governors on whose cooperation the programme depended.
The most enduring achievements came in 1965. The Social Security Amendments created Medicare — health insurance for Americans over 65, funded through payroll taxes and fulfilling a Democratic goal pursued since Truman — and Medicaid, health coverage for the poor jointly funded by federal and state governments. Together these were the largest expansion of the welfare state since the New Deal, and they remain central pillars of American social provision, covering tens of millions who would otherwise have none. In education, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965) delivered the first major federal investment in public schooling, directing aid to schools serving low-income children, while the Higher Education Act established scholarships and low-interest loans that widened access to college. The Immigration and Nationality Act (Hart-Celler) of 1965 abolished the national-origins quota system that had shaped American immigration since the 1920s restriction — the very settlement examined in Lesson 1 — replacing it with a system based on family reunification and skills; its sponsors insisted it would not much alter immigration patterns, yet it opened the door to large-scale migration from Asia, Latin America and Africa and reshaped the demographic composition of the nation. A further wave of legislation created the Department of Housing and Urban Development (whose first secretary, Robert Weaver, was the first African American cabinet member), the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities, and landmark environmental protections. The reach was extraordinary; the question was whether the ambition could be sustained.
The liberal hour also opened, tentatively, a new front in the American Dream: the position of women. Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963) had named "the problem that has no name" — the frustration of educated women confined to suburban domesticity, examined in Lesson 4 — and the reforming climate of the mid-1960s translated some of that discontent into policy. The Equal Pay Act (1963) required equal pay for equal work regardless of sex; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964) prohibited employment discrimination on grounds of sex — a provision added late in the legislative process, partly by opponents hoping to sink the bill, which survived to become a powerful legal tool for women's rights; and the National Organization for Women (NOW), founded in 1966 by Friedan and others, pursued equality through law and politics. For the American Dream, this was a characteristic pattern: the liberal state began, however partially, to extend the promise of opportunity to a group long confined by the culture of the affluent society, even as the fuller feminist challenge lay in the decade ahead.
The Great Society was never as coherent as its ambition implied, and it ran quickly into limits that the next two lessons trace to their conclusion. For the American Dream, the decisive tension was between the promise and the delivery.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.