You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932 and the programme of federal action he called the New Deal together constitute the decisive turning point of this depth study and one of the most important developments in modern American history. In the space of a few years, the relationship between the federal government and the citizen was fundamentally recast: Washington took on responsibilities for relief, employment, economic regulation, and social security that it had never previously assumed, and it created institutions and expectations that would shape American politics for a generation. For a depth study, the analytical task is to understand the New Deal as a series of pragmatic, often experimental responses to an unprecedented crisis, to distinguish the aims and character of the First and Second New Deals, and to prepare the ground for the evaluation of the New Deal's effectiveness that Lesson 5 develops.
This lesson treats the New Deal as a problem in analysis rather than a list of agencies to be memorised. The central questions are causal and characterising: what Roosevelt brought to the presidency, why the New Deal took the shape it did, and how far it represented a coherent programme or a pragmatic improvisation. Throughout, the register must remain scholarly, treating the alphabet agencies not as a catalogue but as instruments whose purposes and limitations can be analysed.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson sits at the heart of Edexcel 9HI0 Paper 2, Option 2H.1 (Route H depth study): "The USA, c1920–55: boom, bust and recovery." It covers the 1932 election, Roosevelt and his leadership, the Hundred Days, the First and Second New Deals, and the alphabet agencies. Within our own teaching sequence it follows the crisis of Lesson 3 and sets up the evaluation of opposition and effectiveness in Lesson 5, so that the two lessons together form a single analysis of the New Deal.
Because Paper 2 is a depth paper, the reward is for fine command of a short period and for source judgements set firmly in context. (For the precise weightings and question wording, consult the official Edexcel specification and sample assessment materials rather than any paraphrase.)
The presidential election of 1932 was a landslide. Against the discredited Hoover, Franklin Delano Roosevelt — the Democratic governor of New York — won a commanding victory, carrying all but a handful of states. Roosevelt promised "a new deal for the American people", though the specifics of what that would mean were left deliberately vague during the campaign; what he offered above all was energy, confidence, and a willingness to act.
Roosevelt brought several crucial qualities to the presidency:
| Quality | Significance |
|---|---|
| Pragmatism | He was willing to experiment, declaring his readiness to try one method and, if it failed, to try another; the New Deal was improvised rather than dogmatic |
| Communication | His fireside chats — informal radio addresses — reassured millions and restored a sense of leadership and shared purpose |
| Political skill | He assembled a broad coalition of labour, farmers, urban ethnic voters, African Americans in the North, and Southern whites — the "New Deal coalition" that would dominate American politics for a generation |
| Moral leadership | His inaugural insistence that the nation had nothing to fear but fear itself treated the restoration of national morale as a central task of government |
The analytical point is that Roosevelt's personal qualities were themselves a political resource. In a crisis of confidence as much as of economics, his ability to project reassurance and decisive action helped to arrest the panic and to buy the time in which more concrete measures could work. A strong answer recognises that leadership and morale were not incidental to the New Deal but part of its substance.
The fireside chats deserve particular emphasis as an instrument of this leadership. Broadcasting directly into millions of homes, Roosevelt used the intimacy of radio to explain his policies in plain language and to speak to citizens as neighbours rather than subjects, cultivating a personal bond between the President and the public that was itself politically powerful. The first chat, on the banking crisis, is the clearest illustration: by calmly explaining why the reopened banks were now safe, Roosevelt persuaded frightened Americans to return their savings, and the runs ceased. This demonstrated that the restoration of confidence was not mere rhetoric but a concrete policy achievement — a lesson in the political uses of communication that a strong answer will connect to the substance of the New Deal rather than treat as background colour.
Roosevelt's first months in office, from March 1933, produced an extraordinary burst of legislation known as the Hundred Days, as a compliant Congress passed measure after measure aimed at relief (easing immediate suffering), recovery (restarting the economy), and reform (preventing a recurrence of the crisis). This threefold framework — relief, recovery, reform — is the essential organising tool for analysing the New Deal, and a strong answer will use it rather than simply listing agencies.
The sheer scale and speed of the Hundred Days were themselves significant. Roosevelt came to office at the very nadir of the crisis, with the banking system collapsing and public confidence exhausted, and he seized the moment to drive an unprecedented volume of legislation through a Congress willing, in the emergency, to grant the executive extraordinary latitude. The pace communicated energy and purpose after the perceived paralysis of the Hoover years, and it established the New Deal as a government that would act. This burst of activity is often taken as the model of a dynamic first hundred days in office, and its psychological effect — the restoration of a sense that the government was in control of events — was part of its purpose.
The most urgent task was the banking crisis. The Emergency Banking Act closed all banks for inspection and reopened only those judged sound, and Roosevelt used his first fireside chat to persuade Americans to return their money; deposits flowed back and the runs ceased. This early success — restoring confidence in the banks within days — set the tone for the whole programme and demonstrated that decisive federal action could achieve what voluntary effort had not.
The Hundred Days and the months that followed created the first generation of "alphabet agencies". The table below groups them by their primary purpose, though many pursued more than one.
| Agency / Act | Primary purpose | Detail and outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Emergency Banking Act / Glass-Steagall Act | Reform (banking) | Reopened sound banks; Glass-Steagall separated commercial and investment banking and created deposit insurance (FDIC), ending the bank runs |
| FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) | Reform (banking) | Insured deposits, so that a bank failure no longer meant the loss of savings; still exists today |
| SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) | Reform (finance) | Regulated the stock market to curb the speculative abuses that had fed the Crash |
| CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps) | Relief / recovery | Employed young men in conservation and public works; hugely popular; employed millions over its life and planted vast numbers of trees |
| FERA (Federal Emergency Relief Administration) | Relief | Provided federal grants to states for direct relief; run by Harry Hopkins; immediate but temporary help |
| AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Administration) | Recovery (agriculture) | Paid farmers to reduce production to raise prices; raised farm incomes but controversially destroyed crops and livestock while people went hungry; later struck down by the Supreme Court |
| NRA (National Recovery Administration) | Recovery (industry) | Set industry codes on prices, wages, and hours and guaranteed labour's right to organise; over-bureaucratic and later struck down by the Supreme Court |
| TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) | Recovery / reform | Built dams and power plants in the Tennessee Valley, providing cheap electricity, flood control, and development to one of the poorest regions; a model of regional planning that still operates |
Two features of the First New Deal deserve analytical emphasis. First, its priorities were emergency relief and recovery — stopping the bleeding and restarting the economy — rather than long-term structural change. Second, it was strikingly experimental and internally inconsistent: the NRA sought to raise industrial prices by restricting competition while other measures sought to raise purchasing power, and the AAA raised food prices in the midst of hunger. Roosevelt himself described his method as bold, persistent experimentation, and the First New Deal is best understood as a pragmatic scramble for anything that might work rather than a coherent economic theory applied from above.
The First New Deal also ran quickly into constitutional trouble, which shaped the second phase. The conservative majority on the Supreme Court regarded much of the emergency legislation as an unconstitutional extension of federal power, and in 1935 and 1936 it struck down two of the flagship recovery agencies — the NRA and the AAA. These defeats were a serious blow, invalidating central planks of the recovery programme, and they help explain both the shift of the Second New Deal towards measures on firmer constitutional ground and the confrontation with the Court that Lesson 5 examines. The early clash with the judiciary is a reminder that the New Deal was contested from the outset and that its expansion of federal power was neither uncontroversial nor legally secure.
By 1935 the emergency phase had passed, but recovery was incomplete and Roosevelt faced mounting criticism from the left (Huey Long, Coughlin, Townsend), from the right (business and the Supreme Court), and from the persistence of high unemployment. His response was a second wave of legislation, the Second New Deal, distinguished from the first by its greater emphasis on reform and on the rights of labour and the poor. This shift — from emergency relief to lasting structural reform — is the key distinction for analysing the New Deal's development, and a strong answer will use it to structure an argument. The pressures driving the shift are worth naming precisely: the persistence of high unemployment showed that recovery was incomplete; the Supreme Court's destruction of the NRA and AAA forced a rethinking of method; the popularity of radical critics such as Huey Long threatened to draw support away from Roosevelt on the left; and the approaching 1936 election created an incentive to consolidate the loyalty of workers and the poor. The Second New Deal was thus a response both to the failures of the first phase and to the political landscape of the mid-1930s.
| Legislation / Agency | Purpose | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| WPA (Works Progress Administration) | Employment | Employed millions on public works — roads, bridges, schools, hospitals — and on arts projects; the largest New Deal employment programme, under Harry Hopkins |
| Social Security Act (1935) | Reform (welfare) | Established old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, and aid to dependent children — the foundation of the American welfare state; but excluded agricultural and domestic workers, disproportionately African American |
| Wagner Act / National Labor Relations Act (1935) | Reform (labour) | Guaranteed the right to organise and bargain collectively and created the National Labor Relations Board; union membership surged |
| Revenue Act (1935) | Reform (taxation) | Raised taxes on high incomes and corporations; symbolically important but raised relatively little revenue |
The Wagner Act in particular helped to ignite a dramatic upsurge in industrial unionism. The newly formed Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), led by John L. Lewis, organised workers across entire industries rather than by craft, bringing in mass-production workers, immigrants, and African Americans; a wave of sit-down strikes, most famously the victory over General Motors at Flint, Michigan, in 1936–37, forced major corporations to recognise unions for the first time. This transformation of labour, underwritten by federal law, was among the most far-reaching social consequences of the New Deal and helped cement industrial workers within the Democratic coalition.
The Social Security Act was arguably the New Deal's most enduring achievement, establishing the principle that the federal government bears responsibility for the economic security of citizens in old age, unemployment, and need. Its exclusions — of agricultural and domestic workers, categories that included most African Americans and many women — reveal the limits of the reform and the compromises Roosevelt made to secure the support of Southern Democrats, a theme developed in Lesson 5.
The deepest significance of the New Deal lay not in any single agency but in the transformation of the relationship between the federal government and the citizen. Before 1933, responsibility for relief and economic welfare rested overwhelmingly with the states, local government, private charity, and the individual; the federal government's peacetime role in the economy was limited. The New Deal decisively changed this. Washington now provided direct relief and employment, regulated banking, the stock market, and industrial relations, guaranteed bank deposits and old-age pensions, and accepted a general responsibility for the economic security of citizens that no previous administration had assumed. This was a genuine constitutional and political revolution, achieved not by amending the constitution but by a vast expansion of what the federal government did in practice.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.