You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
If the Vietnam War shattered Americans' faith in their government's competence and honesty abroad, the presidency of Richard Nixon and the scandal that destroyed it completed the destruction of that faith at home. Nixon came to power in 1968 promising order and an end to the divisions of the 1960s, and his administration achieved genuinely historic things — the opening to China, arms control with the Soviet Union, and the extrication of American forces from Vietnam. Yet the same presidency pursued a systematic assault on democratic norms that culminated in the only resignation of a president in American history. The scandal known as Watergate exposed an abuse of power at the very summit of the state, and its revelation, following so closely on the deceptions of Vietnam, drove public trust in government to its lowest recorded ebb. This lesson examines Nixon's presidency — his appeal to the "silent majority," his diplomacy of détente, and his strategy of Vietnamisation — before turning to the Watergate scandal and its constitutional crisis, and then to the troubled mid-1970s of Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, an era of stagflation and national "malaise."
For the Edexcel depth study, this lesson is the pivot from the era of challenge to the era of conservative reaction. The disillusionment it charts — with government, with the presidency, with the very idea that the federal state could solve the nation's problems — is the essential precondition for the Reagan revival of the following lesson. Mastery of this topic depends on holding a genuine paradox in view: that Nixon was at once a president of real achievement and a president who gravely abused his office, and that Watergate was both the story of one man's criminality and the culmination of a longer growth of executive power. It depends, too, on understanding that the economic troubles of the 1970s were not incidental to the political disillusionment but part of the same crisis of confidence, as the long post-war boom gave way to stagnation and inflation together. The subject must be handled with rigour: the events of Watergate are a matter of documented public and legal record, to be analysed critically rather than sensationalised.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson belongs to Edexcel 9HI0 Paper 2, Option 2H.2 (Route H depth study): "The USA, 1955–92: conformity and challenge." It covers Nixon's presidency and diplomacy, the Watergate scandal and resignation, and the Ford and Carter years of stagflation and "malaise." Within our own teaching sequence it follows directly from Vietnam, whose collapse of trust it completes and deepens, and it prepares the ground for the Reagan-era conservative revival of the next lesson, which fed on precisely the disillusionment charted here.
Because Paper 2 is a depth paper, the reward is for fine command of a short period and for source judgements set firmly in context. (For the precise weightings and question wording, consult the official Edexcel specification and sample assessment materials rather than any paraphrase.)
Key definition. The imperial presidency — a term associated with the historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. — refers to the expansion of presidential power beyond its constitutional bounds, especially in foreign policy and national security, enabled by the Cold War and the growth of the executive branch since the Second World War. Watergate is often read as the moment at which this expansion collided with the checks of Congress, the courts, and the press.
Richard Nixon won the presidency in 1968 at the close of the most turbulent year of the decade, defeating the Democrat Hubert Humphrey (and the segregationist third-party candidate George Wallace) in a campaign that promised to restore order and to speak for the Americans who felt overlooked amid the protests and upheavals. In a celebrated address of November 1969, Nixon appealed to the "silent majority" — the great body of ordinary, law-abiding Americans who, he argued, did not march or riot but wished to see stability restored and the war ended honourably. The phrase captured a real and important constituency, and it signalled the strategy that would define his presidency and prefigure the conservative resurgence: the mobilisation of a middle-American backlash against the disorder, protest, and cultural change of the 1960s.
Nixon's domestic record was more complex than his conservative reputation suggests. On the one hand he pursued a "law and order" agenda and a "Southern strategy" designed to draw white Southern voters, long loyal to the Democrats, into the Republican coalition — a realignment of lasting consequence. On the other hand, governing with a Democratic Congress, he presided over a considerable expansion of federal activity: the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (1970), significant environmental and workplace-safety legislation, and the indexing of Social Security. His was not yet the small-government conservatism of the Reagan era; it was a pragmatic, sometimes liberal, domestic presidency wrapped in conservative rhetoric. But it is for his foreign policy and for Watergate that his presidency is chiefly remembered.
Nixon's most substantial and durable achievements lay in foreign policy, where, working closely with his National Security Adviser and later Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, he pursued a strategy of détente — the easing of Cold War tensions through negotiation and a balance of power. Kissinger's approach was that of realpolitik, grounded in calculations of national interest and the balance of power rather than in anti-communist ideology, and it produced results that reshaped the international order.
| Achievement | Date | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Opening to China | February 1972 | Nixon's visit to Beijing began the normalisation of relations with the People's Republic of China, exploiting the Sino-Soviet split and transforming the strategic landscape |
| SALT I | May 1972 | The first Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, together with the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, capped the nuclear arms race |
| Moscow summit | May 1972 | The first presidential visit to Moscow; trade and cooperation agreements signalled a thaw in superpower relations |
The opening to China was the more startling, for Nixon had built his early career on fierce anti-communism, and only a figure with such credentials could have made the overture without being accused of weakness. Détente did not end the Cold War, and it coexisted with morally troubling policies elsewhere — support for authoritarian regimes, the secret bombing of Cambodia — but it materially reduced the danger of nuclear confrontation and stands as the enduring monument of Nixon's statecraft. The historian Robert Dallek, in Nixon and Kissinger (2007), examined this partnership closely, arguing that Nixon's authentic diplomatic gifts were fatally entangled with the secrecy, suspicion, and contempt for constitutional constraint that would destroy him.
On the war he had inherited, Nixon's strategy was "Vietnamisation" — the gradual transfer of the fighting to South Vietnamese forces while American troops were withdrawn, so that the United States could disengage without an overt admission of defeat. American troop levels fell steeply, from over half a million in 1968 to a small fraction of that by 1972. Yet the reality was more equivocal than the rhetoric of winding down suggested: Nixon simultaneously widened the war, ordering the secret bombing of Cambodia from 1969 and the Cambodian incursion of 1970, which triggered the wave of campus protest that culminated in the killings at Kent State. The Paris Peace Accords of January 1973 secured a ceasefire and the withdrawal of the last American combat forces, but they did not save South Vietnam, which fell to the North in April 1975, its capital evacuated in scenes of helicopters lifting the last Americans from the embassy. Vietnamisation extricated the United States, but it did so slowly and at further cost, and it could not disguise the fact that the war had ended in failure.
The scandal that destroyed Nixon began, in his own dismissive phrase, as a "third-rate burglary," and grew into the gravest constitutional crisis since the Civil War. Its essence was not the break-in but the cover-up, and the abuse of the powers of the presidency to obstruct justice.
In the early hours of 17 June 1972, five men were arrested breaking into the offices of the Democratic National Committee in the Watergate building in Washington. The burglars had links to the Committee to Re-elect the President, and what began as an apparently minor crime was revealed, over two years of investigation, to be one strand of a systematic pattern of political espionage, sabotage, and abuse of power directed from within the Nixon White House. The dogged reporting of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the Washington Post, assisted by a confidential source, kept the story alive when official Washington wished it buried, and traced the connections between the burglars and the president's men.
The decisive question became not who ordered the break-in but how high the cover-up reached — a question crystallised by a senator's famous formulation: what did the president know, and when did he know it? The following timeline marks the crisis's course.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 17 June 1972 | Five men arrested breaking into the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate complex |
| 1972–73 | Woodward and Bernstein of the Washington Post expose links between the burglars and the White House |
| 30 April 1973 | Senior aides H. R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman resign amid the widening scandal |
| May 1973 | The Senate Watergate Committee begins nationally televised hearings |
| July 1973 | Alexander Butterfield reveals the existence of a secret White House taping system |
| 20 October 1973 | The "Saturday Night Massacre": Nixon has the special prosecutor Archibald Cox dismissed; the Attorney General and his deputy resign rather than obey |
| July 1974 | The Supreme Court rules unanimously in United States v. Nixon that the president must surrender the tapes |
| August 1974 | The "smoking gun" tape (of 23 June 1972) reveals Nixon ordering the use of the CIA to obstruct the FBI investigation — proof of obstruction of justice |
| 9 August 1974 | Nixon resigns; Vice President Gerald Ford succeeds him |
Watergate was never merely about a burglary. The investigations exposed a systematic pattern of abuse of the powers of government for partisan and personal ends:
The historian Stanley Kutler, in The Wars of Watergate (1990), argued that the scandal was not an isolated aberration but the logical culmination of the "imperial presidency" — the concentration of power in the executive that had been building since the Second World War. Nixon's abuses were more flagrant than those of his predecessors, but the institutional framework that enabled them, Kutler contended, had been decades in the making. This interpretation is essential to a top-band judgement, for it lifts Watergate from a tale of individual criminality into a crisis of the constitutional order.
The end came when the Supreme Court, in United States v. Nixon (July 1974), unanimously rejected the president's claim of executive privilege and ordered him to hand over the White House tapes. Among them was the recording of 23 June 1972 — the "smoking gun" — on which Nixon is heard, only days after the break-in, directing that the CIA be used to obstruct the FBI's investigation. This was direct evidence of obstruction of justice, and it destroyed the last of his support: facing certain impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate, Nixon resigned on 9 August 1974, the only president ever to do so. His Vice President, Gerald Ford, became president.
Historians have long debated whether Watergate proves that "the system worked." On one reading, it did: a free press exposed the scandal, Congress investigated it, the courts compelled the evidence, and a lawless president was forced from office by constitutional means, without a coup or a purge. On another reading, the outcome was far more precarious than this reassuring account allows — the cover-up came within a hair of succeeding, and its exposure depended on the chance revelation of the taping system and on the courage of particular individuals. Whichever emphasis one prefers, the deepest consequence lay elsewhere: in the durable collapse of public trust in government that Watergate, coming atop Vietnam, left behind.
The presidencies that followed Nixon's fall unfolded in the long shadow of Vietnam and Watergate, and against a darkening economic backdrop. Together they gave the 1970s their enduring reputation as a decade of drift, disillusionment, and diminished expectations.
Gerald Ford — the only president never elected to the presidency or vice-presidency, having been appointed Vice President after Spiro Agnew's resignation for corruption — assumed office promising that "our long national nightmare is over." Within a month, however, he pardoned Nixon for all federal offences he had committed or might have committed as president. Ford argued that a trial of the former president would tear the country apart and that the nation needed to move on; his critics suspected a corrupt bargain and were outraged that Nixon would face no accountability. The pardon was deeply unpopular, deepened the very cynicism it was meant to dispel, and contributed to Ford's narrow defeat in the 1976 election. His brief presidency was further burdened by the fall of South Vietnam in 1975 and by the worst economic conditions since the Depression.
The economic troubles of the 1970s were as corrosive of confidence as the political scandals, and the two are best understood together. The long post-war boom, which had underwritten the affluence and optimism of the earlier lessons, came to an end, and the American economy entered a period of stagflation — the unhappy and, to contemporary economists, baffling combination of economic stagnation (slow growth and high unemployment) with high inflation. Several forces converged to produce it:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.