You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The previous lesson showed that memory ability varies between people; this lesson follows the most systematic source of that variation — development across the lifespan — from its very beginning to its later changes. Three phenomena anchor the topic. Infantile amnesia is the near-universal inability of adults to recall events from the first few years of life. The development of memory strategies — rehearsal, then organisation, then elaboration — explains why memory performance improves so markedly through childhood. And memory change in older age shows that development does not stop at maturity: memory continues to change, selectively, into later life. Taken together these tell a developmental story that complements the topic's structural models (multi-store, working memory, Tulving) by asking how memory comes to work as it does, and how it changes over a lifetime. As throughout, claims are tied to real theory and evidence.
Key Definition: The developmental psychology of memory studies how memory abilities emerge, mature and change across the whole lifespan — from the encoding limits of infancy, through the strategic gains of childhood, to the selective changes of older age.
This lesson addresses the Edexcel 9PS0 — Paper 1, Topic 2: Cognitive Psychology content on memory across the lifespan: infantile amnesia and its explanations; the development of memory strategies (rehearsal, organisation, elaboration) and metamemory in childhood; and memory change in older age. It draws on the topic's core constructs — the working memory model (the maturing phonological loop and central executive), Tulving's types of LTM (the late emergence and later vulnerability of episodic memory), and consolidation — to give the developmental changes a mechanism. In assessment-objective terms, you should be able to describe these lifespan changes and their explanations (AO1), apply them to examples across ages (AO2), and evaluate the competing explanations and the methods used to study memory in the very young and the old (AO3).
Connects to…
Almost no adult can recall genuine episodic memories from before roughly the age of three to four, and memories from the period up to about six or seven are typically sparse and fragmentary. This near-universal phenomenon is infantile (or childhood) amnesia. It is not that nothing is learned in infancy — infants plainly acquire language, motor skills, attachments and vast semantic knowledge — but that the autonoetic, personally-experienced episodic memories that adults can consciously re-live do not survive from the earliest years.
Key Definition: Infantile amnesia is the general inability of older children and adults to recall episodic memories of events from approximately the first three to four years of life, despite the extensive learning that demonstrably occurs during infancy.
The evidence that infants can form some memories, even as those memories fail to persist into later childhood, comes from clever non-verbal paradigms. Rovee-Collier's conditioned mobile studies showed that infants as young as two to three months can learn that kicking moves an overhead mobile (via a ribbon tied to the ankle) and will remember this association — kicking more when shown the mobile days later — demonstrating genuine long-term retention in infancy. Crucially, however, this early memory is highly cue-dependent and short-lived: it fades within days or weeks and is easily disrupted by a change of context. So infant memory exists but is fragile, context-bound and does not develop the durability and self-referential quality of adult episodic memory.
Several complementary explanations are examined, and the strongest answers treat them as combining rather than competing.
| Explanation | Core claim | Key support |
|---|---|---|
| Neurological immaturity | The brain structures underpinning episodic memory — especially the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex — are immature in infancy; ongoing neurogenesis in the hippocampus may even overwrite early traces | Episodic memory emerges as these structures mature; animal work links hippocampal neurogenesis to forgetting of early memories |
| Lack of language / a "cognitive self" | Durable autobiographical memory requires language to encode and rehearse events, and a developed sense of self to which events can be anchored; both emerge around 18–24 months and mature thereafter | Children's earliest retrievable memories date to roughly when self-recognition and narrative language appear; the social interaction / reminiscing account (Nelson & Fivush) |
| Absent memory strategies & schemas | Infants lack the rehearsal, organisational strategies and rich schemas that make events encodable and retrievable as structured episodes | Memory improves as strategies develop (see below); events are better remembered once children can slot them into scripts |
| Encoding specificity mismatch | Adult retrieval cues do not match the cues present at infant encoding (the infant's very different perceptual and conceptual world), so early memories are inaccessible rather than absent | Consistent with retrieval-failure theory (Tulving & Thomson, 1973); early memories can sometimes be cued by matching contexts |
The social-interaction / reminiscing account deserves emphasis because it has strong developmental support: children whose parents engage in richer, more elaborative reminiscing conversations ("What did we see at the zoo? What happened next?") develop earlier and more detailed autobiographical memories. This suggests autobiographical memory is partly socially constructed — children learn the narrative form of "remembering my own past" through guided conversation, which is why the offset of infantile amnesia is later in cultures that emphasise individual autobiography less. Infantile amnesia is therefore best explained not by any single deficit but by the convergence of an immature memory brain, the emergence of language and a cognitive self, and the acquisition of the strategies and narrative framework that make experiences into retrievable episodes.
Once past infancy, the dramatic improvement in children's memory across the school years is driven less by raw capacity than by the acquisition of memory strategies — deliberate mental activities used to aid encoding and retrieval — together with growing metamemory (knowledge about one's own memory). The developmental sequence is well established.
flowchart LR
A["Infancy<br/>no deliberate strategies;<br/>cue-dependent memory"] --> B["Early childhood ~5–6<br/>little spontaneous rehearsal<br/>(production deficiency)"]
B --> C["Middle childhood ~7–10<br/>spontaneous rehearsal;<br/>simple organisation emerges"]
C --> D["Late childhood / adolescence<br/>organisation by meaning +<br/>elaboration; metamemory matures"]
The first strategy to emerge is rehearsal — repeating items to keep them active. A classic finding (Flavell and colleagues) is that young children (around five) rarely rehearse spontaneously: observers watching children's lips during a delay saw little sub-vocal rehearsal in five-year-olds but frequent rehearsal in ten-year-olds. Critically, when the younger children were taught or prompted to rehearse, their recall improved to match — showing they could rehearse but did not do so of their own accord.
Key Definition: A production deficiency is the failure to spontaneously produce a memory strategy one is nonetheless capable of using; when prompted, the child uses the strategy effectively and memory improves.
The production deficiency is a central concept: the young child's problem is not an inability to rehearse but a failure to deploy the strategy without prompting. Older children also rehearse more effectively — cumulatively, rehearsing several earlier items together rather than repeating each new item in isolation — which is more powerful than the younger child's item-by-item rehearsal.
The next major gain is organisation — grouping items into meaningful categories to aid recall. Presented with a list containing animals, foods and clothes in mixed order, older children spontaneously cluster their recall by category (recalling the animals together, then the foods) and use this structure to retrieve more; younger children recall in a more haphazard order and remember less. As with rehearsal, younger children show a production deficiency: prompting or training in categorising improves their recall. Organisation is a more sophisticated strategy than rehearsal because it exploits the semantic structure of the material and draws on the child's growing knowledge base — richer semantic memory makes better categories available.
The most advanced strategies, emerging in later childhood and adolescence, involve elaboration — creating meaningful links between items, or between new material and existing knowledge (forming a mental image, a story, or a connection that ties items together). Elaboration is powerful because, like Craik and Lockhart's (1972) deep, semantic processing, it produces durable, meaningfully-encoded memories rather than fragile rote traces.
Underpinning all of this is the growth of metamemory — the child's developing knowledge about memory: understanding that some tasks are harder than others, that longer lists need more effort, that studying helps, and that they should keep working until material is learned. As metamemory matures, children become better at selecting and monitoring the appropriate strategy for a task, which is why strategy use becomes not just more frequent but more adaptive with age.
| Strategy | Typical emergence | What it does | Sophistication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehearsal | ~6–7 (spontaneous) | Repeats items to keep them active | Basic; item-by-item at first, cumulative later |
| Organisation | ~9–10 | Groups items by category/meaning | Intermediate; exploits semantic structure |
| Elaboration | Later childhood / adolescence | Creates meaningful links, images, stories | Advanced; deep, durable encoding |
| Metamemory | Grows throughout | Knowledge and monitoring of one's own memory | Enables adaptive strategy selection |
Two mechanisms therefore combine to drive the childhood improvement: the maturation of the underlying system (a faster phonological loop and a more capable central executive, as in the previous lesson) and the acquisition and deployment of increasingly sophisticated strategies. The developmental data make clear that the strategy component is large — much of what looks like a "better memory" in an older child is really better strategy use on a modestly larger hardware base.
Development does not end at maturity. Memory changes again in older age, and — as stressed in the previous lesson — the change is strongly selective rather than a uniform decline. The developmental framing adds a striking symmetry: the memory systems that emerge latest in development tend to be the most vulnerable in ageing, while the earliest-developing systems are the most robust.
This "last in, first out" pattern is a genuinely satisfying piece of developmental logic: the phylogenetically and ontogenetically newest, most hippocampus- and prefrontal-dependent forms of memory (episodic, executive) are both the slowest to develop and the first to falter, whereas the oldest, most consolidated and distributed forms (semantic, procedural) are both early to appear and last to decline. Bahrick et al.'s (1975) finding that recognition of school classmates stayed near 90% for decades further shows that thoroughly consolidated long-term memories resist age-related decline. The developmental picture of ageing is therefore not decline-versus-preservation at random, but a principled pattern that mirrors, in reverse, the order in which memory systems come online.
Two design issues are central to evaluating this field and reward explicit discussion.
First, studying infants requires non-verbal measures, because infants cannot report memories. Techniques such as Rovee-Collier's conditioned kicking, preferential looking and habituation (an infant looks longer at a novel than a familiar stimulus, implying it remembers the familiar one) allow inferences about memory without language — but they measure recognition and conditioning rather than the episodic memory that infantile amnesia is about, so we must be cautious in equating them.
Second, studying ageing confronts the classic confound of cross-sectional versus longitudinal design.
| Design | Method | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional | Compare different age groups at one time | Quick; no attrition | Cohort effects — age groups differ in education, nutrition, health, test familiarity, not just age, so differences may not be ageing |
| Longitudinal | Follow the same people over years | Isolates genuine age change; controls cohort | Slow; costly; attrition (drop-out, and the healthiest survivors remain, flattering later scores); practice effects from repeated testing |
Because cross-sectional studies may overstate age-related memory decline (a 75-year-old and a 20-year-old differ in schooling and test experience as well as age), the most credible conclusions about ageing come from longitudinal data or from designs that control cohort — a caution that tempers any headline claim about "how much" memory declines with age.
A strength of the infantile-amnesia literature is that the phenomenon itself is extremely robust — near-universal across individuals and cultures — and that its explanations converge rather than merely compete. Neurological immaturity, the emergence of language and a cognitive self, absent strategies/schemas, and encoding-specificity mismatch each capture part of the picture, and the evidence (hippocampal maturation and neurogenesis; the timing of self-recognition; the reminiscing findings) supports a multi-factor account. This matters because a phenomenon explained by several mutually reinforcing mechanisms is better understood than one resting on a single contested cause. The implication is that infantile amnesia is not a puzzle to be solved by picking one explanation but a case where the developmental, neural and social strands genuinely combine — which is exactly the integrated understanding top answers show.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.