You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 8 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Most of the marks students lose on Edexcel GCSE English Language are lost to a small set of predictable mistakes. These are not failures of knowledge — they are failures of habit, almost always committed under time pressure. If you can name them in advance, you can catch yourself doing them. This lesson is a tour of the twelve most common traps across Paper 1 and Paper 2, with worked examples and an action to take when each one threatens to bite.
This lesson develops exam self-awareness — the ability to recognise a familiar mistake before you complete it.
| # | Trap | Where it bites | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feature-spotting | Q2, Q3, Q4 on both papers | 4–6 marks |
| 2 | Quoting too much | Q4 Paper 1, Q3 Paper 2 | 2–4 marks |
| 3 | Ignoring Q5's statement | Paper 1 Q5 | 4–6 marks |
| 4 | Running over on Q4 | Paper 1 | Costs Q5 time |
| 5 | Not proofreading | Section B both papers | 3–5 AO6 marks |
| 6 | FAP mismatch | Paper 2 Section B | 4–6 marks |
| 7 | Conflating language and structure | Q4 Paper 1, Q3 Paper 2 | 3–5 marks |
| 8 | Forgetting SPaG | Section B, both papers | 3–8 AO6 marks |
| 9 | Starting Section B without a plan | Both papers | 4–8 marks |
| 10 | Ending imaginative piece with "it was all a dream" | Paper 1 Section B | 3–5 marks |
| 11 | No paragraphs in transactional writing | Paper 2 Section B | 3–5 marks |
| 12 | AFOREST as a checklist, not a toolkit | Paper 2 Section B | 2–4 marks |
None of these are exotic. They are the same twelve mistakes Edexcel has flagged in examiners' reports year after year.
What it looks like: listing techniques without analysing their effect.
The writer uses a simile, personification and alliteration in this paragraph. These create imagery for the reader.
Why it loses marks: the Edexcel mark scheme rewards analysis, not identification. Naming a technique is a Level 1–2 behaviour. Course 1 covered this for Paper 1 Q4; Course 3 covered it for Paper 2 Q3.
The fix: after naming any technique, use the phrase "this has the effect of..." or "this is effective because..." and write at least two more sentences. If you cannot write two more sentences, the technique is not worth mentioning.
What it looks like: quoting whole sentences when two words would do.
The writer says "the wind howled through the trees like a pack of wolves chasing something through the dark" which creates a scary atmosphere.
Why it loses marks: long quotations are undifferentiated — the examiner doesn't know which bit you thought mattered. As Lesson 3 covered, judicious means well-chosen.
The fix: quote 2–5 words at a time. Pick the specific words your analysis is about. If you need to reference a longer passage, paraphrase and quote the key phrase.
What it looks like: treating Paper 1 Q5 as another analysis question instead of engaging with the provided statement.
Why it loses marks: Q5 always gives you a statement to evaluate. If you don't refer to the statement in your answer, you are answering a question you weren't asked. As Lesson 3 explained, Q5 tests AO4 (evaluation) — your job is to decide how well the writer achieves the effect described in the statement.
The fix: in your first sentence, quote part of the statement. In your last paragraph, return to the statement and either confirm or qualify it. Every paragraph should have at least one word from the statement echoed in it.
What it looks like: writing a four-paragraph Q4 response because the writing was going well, then running out of time for Q5.
Why it loses marks: Q4 and Q5 are each 15 marks. Marks above about 12 on Q4 cost you at a diminishing rate; marks below 12 on Q5 are cheap to lose. Ten extra minutes on Q4 might gain you 1 mark and cost you 5 on Q5.
The fix: set a hard 20-minute cap on Q4. When your watch says hard cap, finish the sentence you are on and move to Q5.
What it looks like: finishing Section B at the last second and closing the paper.
Why it loses marks: AO6 (technical accuracy) is worth 16 of the 40 Section B marks on each paper. As Course 2 and Course 4 covered, a five-minute proofread typically catches 3–5 AO6 marks — apostrophes, missing words, tense slips, sentence boundary errors.
The fix: set a hard time limit for finishing writing, five minutes before the paper ends. Proofread in the remaining time, no exceptions.
What it looks like: writing a Paper 2 Section B speech that reads like an article, or an article that reads like an essay.
Why it loses marks: FAP (Form, Audience, Purpose) is half the AO5 grade on Paper 2 Section B. Course 4, Lesson 2 taught this in detail. A speech to a local council is not the same register as an article for a broadsheet, and examiners can tell immediately which one you have written.
The fix: write FAP at the top of your plan. Form: speech. Audience: local council members. Purpose: persuade + inform. Refer back to your FAP at least twice during writing.
What it looks like: writing about "language and structure" without being clear which is which, or labelling everything "structure" because it's at the start or end.
Why it loses marks: the question asks you to analyse both. As Course 1 covered, language is about word and phrase choice (vocabulary, imagery, sentence-level choices). Structure is about organisation (order of paragraphs, shifts in perspective, openings, endings, sentence length patterns across a passage). Putting a language analysis in the structure section earns nothing.
The fix: plan one language point and one structure point per paragraph, or dedicate a paragraph to each explicitly. Label them in your head as you write.
What it looks like: no semicolons, no dashes, no varied sentence lengths in a 40-mark response. Apostrophes in plurals. Run-on sentences.
Why it loses marks: AO6 rewards range and accuracy of punctuation and sentence forms. Course 2 Lesson 8 and Course 4 Lesson 7 covered the specific punctuation moves that lift AO6 from Level 3 to Level 4.
The fix: put one semicolon, one dash and one varied-length sentence in every Section B response. Proofread for apostrophes specifically.
What it looks like: reading the question, picking up the pen and writing the first sentence that comes to mind. After three paragraphs, the piece wanders. After four, the ending is missing.
Why it loses marks: AO5 rewards structure. An unplanned imaginative piece almost never has a deliberate ending. An unplanned transactional piece drifts in register.
The fix: five-minute plan, always. As Courses 2 and 4 covered, the plan contains the opening, three or four paragraph beats, the ending, and two anchor language moves. Five minutes of planning saves ten minutes of rewriting.
What it looks like: running out of ideas at the climax, pulling the emergency cord and revealing that none of it happened.
Why it loses marks: it is the single most common ending-trap in Paper 1 Section B. It signals to the examiner that the writer did not plan an ending, and it collapses any tension the piece was building. AO5 rewards structure — a collapsed ending is a structural failure.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 8 lessons in this course.