You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 18 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Knowing the poems is half of the job. Knowing how to compare them is the other half. Edexcel's Paper 2 Section B Part 1 will give you one named poem and ask you to compare it with one you choose from the cluster. Your grade depends heavily on whether you can structure a piece of comparative writing that does both poems justice, answers the question directly, and shows close analysis of craft.
This lesson teaches you the practical skills of comparison: how to choose your second poem, how to structure your essay, how to use comparative connectives, how to balance AO1 and AO2, and how to move between poems fluently in every paragraph.
The prompt will always follow a similar pattern:
"Compare how [theme / feeling / technique] is presented in [named poem] and in one other poem from the Relationships anthology."
Typical prompts:
Your response must do three things at once: answer the specific prompt, cover both poems, and analyse language, form and structure.
There are two main structures for a comparison essay.
| Structure | How it works | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text-by-text | Paragraphs on poem 1, then paragraphs on poem 2 | Clear, easy to draft | Comparison often thin; may read as two mini-essays |
| Point-by-point | Each paragraph covers a shared idea, moving between both poems | Deeper comparison; earns AO1 and AO2 together | Requires planning; needs practice |
Point-by-point is strongly preferred at Grade 6+. It forces you to think comparatively from the first sentence of every paragraph, and it makes examiners' lives easier — they can see the comparison at every step, which is what they are marking.
graph TD
A[Opening paragraph: both poems, key point] --> B[Paragraph 1: shared theme]
B --> C[Paragraph 2: contrasting approach]
C --> D[Paragraph 3: language/imagery]
D --> E[Paragraph 4: form/structure]
E --> F[Closing paragraph: answers the prompt]
Because the first poem is named, your real decision is the second. A strong choice shares at least one meaningful feature with the named poem and offers a productive contrast. A weak choice either shares too much (you have nothing to compare) or too little (the comparison feels forced).
Three effective pairing strategies:
| Strategy | Example | What it delivers |
|---|---|---|
| Same theme, different tone | Sonnet 116 + Valentine — both define love | Contrast in register |
| Same situation, different speaker | Nettles + The Manhunt — both protective | Contrast in perspective |
| Similar imagery, different conclusion | Neutral Tones + A Complaint — both water/cold | Contrast in blame |
These are the small phrases that bind your essay together. Learn them, and deploy them in every body paragraph.
| Connective family | Examples |
|---|---|
| Agreement | similarly, likewise, in the same way, both poets |
| Contrast | whereas, in contrast, however, by contrast, on the other hand |
| Qualification | although, while, even so, yet |
| Emphasis | notably, importantly, strikingly |
| Comparison of degree | more strongly, more explicitly, less directly |
A safe test: if you delete every connective and your paragraphs still make sense as standalone paragraphs, your essay is text-by-text, not point-by-point. Put the connectives back in.
| AO | Marks | What it credits | How to earn it |
|---|---|---|---|
| AO1 | 12 | Reading, understanding, responding with textual reference | Clear argument, accurate paraphrase where needed, short integrated quotations |
| AO2 | 8 | Analysis of language, form, structure; use of terminology | Named techniques, close unpacking of effect |
AO1 is the bigger pot, so do not neglect it for virtuoso AO2 moments. A response that identifies three techniques beautifully but misses the poem's meaning will not reach Grade 6.
The best responses interleave AO1 and AO2. Every analytical point ideally hits both: "The onion's 'fierce kiss' (AO2 — the aggressive adjective 'fierce' paired with the tender noun 'kiss') captures Duffy's insistence that real love is simultaneously tender and dangerous (AO1 — the poem's argument)."
Here is a short comparative paragraph (roughly what a single body paragraph might look like) pairing Sonnet 116 and Valentine:
Where Shakespeare's Sonnet 116 defines true love by abstraction and metaphor — "an ever-fixed mark", "the star to every wandering bark" — its three quatrains and final couplet in iambic pentameter enacting the orderly control the argument claims, Duffy's Valentine defines love by refusing those very moves. Her free verse and short imperatives ("Take it.", "Here.") reject formal containment, and her extended metaphor of the onion stays resolutely embodied rather than cosmic. Both poets agree that love deserves a truer definition than cliché permits; they disagree about whether that truer definition lives in the stars or on the kitchen table. Shakespeare's love is "never shaken"; Duffy's is "fierce", "possessive", "lethal" — capable of the harm Shakespeare's abstraction cannot admit.
Notice: one point (both define love against cliché), both poems quoted, AO2 (form, extended metaphor, free verse) integrated, AO1 (the poems' actual arguments) clear.
A strong opening paragraph does four things in two to three sentences:
Weak opener:
Love is a very important theme in poetry and has been for many years. In Sonnet 116 by William Shakespeare and Valentine by Carol Ann Duffy, love is presented in different ways.
This opener tells us nothing. It could be attached to any two love poems.
Strong opener:
Shakespeare's Sonnet 116 and Duffy's Valentine both attempt to define true love, but where Shakespeare elevates love as "an ever-fixed mark" — timeless, abstract and unshakeable — Duffy insists on a love that is embodied, imperfect and "fierce". Both poets reject superficial love; they disagree about what takes its place.
Two sentences, both poems named, direct quotation from each, point of comparison established, contrast set up. That is a top-band opening.
The closing paragraph should:
Weak closer:
In conclusion, both poems are about love but present it differently.
Strong closer:
In both Sonnet 116 and Valentine, the real argument is not for love but against cliché. Four centuries apart, Shakespeare and Duffy agree that the best love poetry earns its subject by refusing to lie about it.
| Mistake | What it costs you |
|---|---|
| Writing two essays joined in the middle | AO1 comparison marks |
| Paraphrasing the poems | AO2 analysis marks |
| Long biographical introductions | Time, and marks that were not there |
| Ignoring form and structure | AO2 marks |
| Quoting long passages | Looks weak; two short quotes beats one long one |
| Running out of time on the second poem | Imbalance — examiners notice |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 18 lessons in this course.