You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 13 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Mumbai faces enormous challenges from rapid urbanisation, but it is not passive in the face of these problems. A range of management strategies — from massive government-led top-down projects to community-driven bottom-up initiatives — are being implemented to improve housing, transport, waste management and environmental quality. Understanding these strategies and being able to evaluate their effectiveness is essential for the Edexcel B specification, which requires you to discuss how cities manage growth and work towards sustainability.
The Dharavi Redevelopment Project is one of the most ambitious and controversial urban renewal schemes in the world:
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Proposed in | 2004 (revised multiple times since) |
| Estimated cost | $3–4 billion |
| Lead developer | Adani Group awarded the contract in 2022 (after decades of delays with previous developers) |
| Plan | Demolish existing Dharavi structures and replace them with modern high-rise apartment buildings with proper sanitation, water supply and electricity |
| Eligibility | Residents who can prove they have been living in Dharavi since before 2000 are eligible for a free 350 sq ft (32.5 m²) apartment |
| Commercial element | The developer will also build commercial properties on reclaimed land to fund the residential construction |
| Timeline | Construction expected to take 10–15 years |
| Criticism | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Displacement | Residents who arrived after 2000 (estimated at 30–40% of Dharavi's population) are not eligible for free housing and face eviction |
| Disruption to livelihoods | Dharavi's $1 billion informal economy depends on its current structure — workshops integrated with homes. Moving people to high-rise apartments could destroy these livelihoods |
| Community destruction | Dharavi has strong social networks and community organisations built over generations. Relocating people to different buildings breaks these networks |
| Profit motive | Critics argue the project is driven by the enormous value of Dharavi's land (central Mumbai, estimated $10 billion) rather than genuine concern for residents |
| Scale of disruption | Relocating 1 million+ people while construction takes place is an immense logistical challenge |
| Previous failures | Earlier slum redevelopment projects in Mumbai (e.g., in Goregaon and Jogeshwari) resulted in poor-quality construction, inadequate maintenance and residents selling their apartments and returning to slums |
The SRA is a broader Mumbai-wide programme that has operated since 1995:
Exam Tip: When discussing slum redevelopment, always present both sides. Top-down projects like the DRP offer modern housing but risk destroying livelihoods and communities. The exam rewards balanced evaluation, not one-sided criticism or praise.
In contrast to top-down government schemes, bottom-up approaches involve local communities in planning and decision-making. Several notable examples operate in Mumbai:
SPARC (Society for the Promotion of Area Resource Centres) is an NGO that has worked with Mumbai's slum communities since 1984:
| Initiative | Detail |
|---|---|
| Community toilet blocks | SPARC has helped build and manage hundreds of community toilet blocks in slums, with residents involved in design, construction and maintenance |
| Housing cooperatives | SPARC helps slum dwellers form housing cooperatives that negotiate with government for land tenure and improved services |
| Data collection | Community members survey and map their own settlements — this data is used to advocate for services and resist unjust evictions |
| Women's leadership | SPARC deliberately involves women in leadership roles — Mahila Milan (Women Together) is a network of women's savings groups that manage community funds |
Mumbai's estimated 100,000+ waste pickers (known as kabadiwalas and rag pickers) have organised into cooperatives:
Exam Tip: Bottom-up schemes are often more effective than top-down approaches because they involve the community, respect existing livelihoods and are cheaper to implement. However, they tend to be smaller in scale and slower to produce results. The best exam answers compare top-down and bottom-up approaches.
Mumbai is investing heavily in transport infrastructure to manage congestion and support continued growth:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 13 lessons in this course.