You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Elizabeth's religious settlement of 1559 is one of the most heavily examined topics on Paper 2 Section B. It is the moment she had to decide what kind of Church England would have — and how far she would go to please Protestants, Catholics and those in the middle. This lesson walks through the two key Acts, the doctrines they established, and the compromises built into them.
Understanding the settlement means understanding three things: the legal framework (the Acts), the doctrinal framework (the Prayer Book and the Articles), and the strategic compromise (what Elizabeth called the via media).
England had changed religion four times in 25 years:
| Monarch | Dates | Religious direction |
|---|---|---|
| Henry VIII | 1509–47 | Broke with Rome 1534; Church retained much Catholic doctrine |
| Edward VI | 1547–53 | Reformed Protestant Church; Book of Common Prayer 1549 / 1552 |
| Mary I | 1553–58 | Restored Catholicism; around 280 Protestants executed |
| Elizabeth I | 1558–1603 | Protestant settlement with deliberate ambiguities |
Elizabeth could not please everyone. A fully Protestant settlement risked Catholic rebellion and foreign intervention. A Catholic settlement would destroy her own legitimacy — the Pope did not recognise Henry VIII's marriage to Anne Boleyn. She therefore chose a broad Protestant settlement with enough Catholic ceremony to keep moderate conformists in the pews.
Passed by Parliament in April 1559, the Act of Supremacy:
Refusal to take the oath could lead to loss of office. A second refusal was originally treason, though in practice Elizabeth was reluctant to push bishops into martyrdom.
The Act of Uniformity laid down what services would look like:
The 12-pence fine was modest in 1559 but symbolic: outward conformity was the minimum.
The 1559 Prayer Book was a deliberate compromise. It was closer to the reformed 1552 Prayer Book than to the more traditional 1549 version, but it included wording that could be read in either Catholic or Protestant ways. The classic example is the communion:
This ambiguity was intentional. A Catholic in the pews could still hear echoes of the old Mass; a committed Protestant heard the reformed gospel.
Agreed by Convocation in 1563 and finally given statutory backing in 1571, the Thirty-Nine Articles set out the doctrine of the Church of England. Key features:
| Article topic | Position |
|---|---|
| Authority of Scripture | The Bible is sufficient for salvation |
| Salvation | Justification by faith alone (Protestant) |
| Sacraments | Two — baptism and communion (not the Catholic seven) |
| Transubstantiation | Rejected |
| Clerical marriage | Allowed |
| Role of the monarch | Supreme Governor of the Church |
The Articles are clearly Protestant in substance, but ambiguous in tone on several questions — deliberately leaving space for different emphases inside the Church.
Elizabeth kept bishops and the traditional Church hierarchy. This was unusual for a Protestant country — Calvinist churches on the continent had replaced bishops with presbyteries. The reasons were political as well as theological:
flowchart LR
Queen["Elizabeth I<br/>Supreme Governor"]
AC["Archbishop of Canterbury<br/>(Matthew Parker 1559)"]
AY["Archbishop of York"]
Bish["26 bishops"]
Parish["~9,000 parish clergy"]
Laity["Parish congregations"]
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.