You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 9 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Questions 1 and 2 on Paper 1 are about the historic environment — a specific place and short window of time studied in depth as a case study sitting inside the thematic study. Depending on your thematic option, this will be Whitechapel 1870–1900 (Crime and Punishment), the Western Front 1914–18 (Medicine), or Notting Hill c1948–c1970 (Migrants). Q1 is worth 4 marks, Q2 is worth 8 marks — total 12 marks, both pure AO3. This lesson shows how to handle sources in the historic environment context, the Q1 structure, the Q2 structure with an explicit utility judgement, and the kinds of sources to expect.
The historic environment is a named place in a named decade, linked to a thematic study theme:
| Thematic study | Historic environment |
|---|---|
| Crime and Punishment c1000–present | Whitechapel, c1870–c1900 (policing in the East End; the Jack the Ripper case) |
| Medicine in Britain c1250–present | The British Sector of the Western Front, 1914–18 (injuries, treatment, evacuation) |
| Migrants in Britain c800–present | Notting Hill, c1948–c1970 (Caribbean migration and community life) |
Edexcel provides a sources booklet on Paper 1 containing one or two sources about the historic environment. Q1 asks you to describe features visible in the source; Q2 asks how useful a source is for a named enquiry about the environment.
Key Point: The historic environment questions test SOURCE skills, not content essays. You will feel tempted to dump everything you know about Whitechapel or the Western Front. Resist — both questions are graded on source engagement.
Q1 asks: "Give two things you can infer from Source A about…" or "Describe two features of [Whitechapel in the late 1880s] as shown by Source A."
Two separate, clearly stated features, each supported by a specific detail from the source. 2 marks per feature: 1 for identifying the feature, 1 for supporting it with detail from the source.
Write in two paragraphs, each clearly labelled:
Feature 1: [one-line statement of the feature]
[supporting detail drawn from the source]
Feature 2: [one-line statement of the feature]
[supporting detail drawn from the source]
Question: "Give two things you can infer from Source A about conditions in Whitechapel in 1888." (Source A = photograph of a narrow alley with 30 people, a shared pump, washing overhead.)
Feature 1: Housing in Whitechapel was overcrowded. The photograph shows approximately 30 people in a single alley only a few metres wide, with washing strung between upper floors, indicating that many families shared the same limited outdoor space.
Feature 2: Sanitary infrastructure was poor. The photograph shows a single shared water pump for the whole alley and children barefoot in mud, implying that households did not have private water supply and drainage was inadequate.
That is 4/4. Note: each feature is ONE inferred claim, supported by SPECIFIC detail from the image.
Q2 on Paper 1 is always about the historic environment source. The framework is identical to any AO3 utility question: content + provenance + contextual knowledge + judgement, linked to the named enquiry.
The enquiry will be narrow and tied to the historic environment. Examples:
The enquiry directs what you look for in the source. A Whitechapel photograph might be more useful for "overcrowding" than for "policing" even though it is the same image.
| Paragraph | Content |
|---|---|
| 1 | Content strengths for THIS enquiry + contextual AO1 that supports |
| 2 | Content limits (what the source does NOT show) |
| 3 | Provenance — nature, origin, purpose, audience — and how these affect utility |
| 4 | Judgement sentence substantiated with why you would or would not rely on this source alone |
Edexcel draws from a fixed range of contemporary sources. Each has characteristic strengths and limits:
| Source type | Typical strengths | Typical limits |
|---|---|---|
| Photograph | Vivid, specific detail; shows physical reality | Single moment; composed; may be selected for effect |
| Letter / diary | Personal perspective; contemporary feelings | Subjective; may not be representative |
| Report (government, military, medical) | Systematic data; often broad-based | Bureaucratic framing; may underreport failures |
| Map / plan | Scale, layout, spatial relationships | Abstracts away human experience |
| Census extract | Hard statistical data | Snapshot only; may undercount transient populations |
| Newspaper article | Contemporary coverage; captures public discourse | Editorial angle; audience-driven selection |
| Memoir (written later) | Synthesises long experience | Retrospective; memory distortion |
| Medical case notes | Specific clinical detail | Individual cases not generalisable |
| Photograph of army medical facility | Shows physical conditions | Often posed for recruiting / home-front morale |
"The source is a photograph" is not analysis. The analytical move is: "As a photograph taken for [audience] by [creator], it offers [strength] but [limit]". Every source type has conventions of creation that you can speak to.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 9 lessons in this course.