You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The eighteen years during which Leonid Brezhnev led the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (October 1964 – November 1982) are conventionally described as zastoi — the Russian word for "stagnation" — a term popularised retrospectively by Mikhail Gorbachev to characterise the period. The characterisation is partial but not unfair. Brezhnev's era combined political stability, rising living standards, nuclear parity with the United States and a re-legitimisation of the Soviet system through the cult of the Great Patriotic War, with declining rates of economic growth, creeping military overextension, repression of dissent and a gerontocratic concentration of decision-making that left the Soviet state demonstrably unreformed when the energy prices that had sustained it collapsed in the 1980s. This lesson examines Brezhnev's leadership style, the Kosygin reforms, the Brezhnev Doctrine and Eastern Europe, détente and its collapse, dissident repression, the invasion of Afghanistan, and the brief interregna of Andropov (1982–84) and Chernenko (1984–85).
Brezhnev had been Khrushchev's protégé: a Ukrainian party official who had risen through the wartime political commissariat, served as First Secretary in Kazakhstan during the Virgin Lands Campaign, and chaired the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet from 1960 before coordinating Khrushchev's removal in October 1964. At his accession in October 1964 he was, to most foreign observers, a functional placeholder; by 1966 his reconsolidation of the full title of General Secretary of the Central Committee (a title unused since Stalin in 1952) signalled that he intended to be First among equals rather than one of several.
The early Brezhnev years were presented, deliberately, as a return to collective leadership after Khrushchev's personal improvisation. The triumvirate of Brezhnev (party), Alexei Kosygin (Council of Ministers) and Nikolai Podgorny (Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, formal head of state from 1965) allowed for predictable division of responsibilities. Under Brezhnev's influence, key Khrushchev innovations were quietly reversed: the bifurcated party apparatus of 1962 was restored to a single hierarchy; the sovnarkhozy regional councils of 1957 were abolished in 1965 and the central economic ministries restored; publications critical of Stalin in the later 1950s were gradually withdrawn, and by the early 1970s Stalin was cautiously rehabilitated as a "great wartime leader" even as the Secret Speech remained unrepudiated. Partial re-Stalinisation described the tendency rather than a reversal: the large-scale Terror was not restored, but the thaw was closed.
The defining principle of Brezhnev's personnel management was "stability of cadres" (stabilnost kadrov). Appointments of regional party secretaries, ministers, and Central Committee members were held for years, in many cases for decades. The Politburo of 1980 was, in its average age, one of the oldest governing bodies of any industrial state in history. Suslov (chief ideologist, born 1902), Gromyko (Foreign Minister from 1957, born 1909), Ustinov (Defence Minister, born 1908), Andropov (KGB chair from 1967, born 1914), and Brezhnev himself (born 1906) were the dominant figures into the early 1980s. The stability provided predictability; it produced gerontocracy. A generation of younger administrators — Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, Ligachev, Yeltsin — rose within the regional apparatus during these years but reached the central Politburo only at the end of the period.
| Brezhnev-era Politburo figures | Role | Years |
|---|---|---|
| Leonid Brezhnev | General Secretary CPSU | 1964–82 |
| Alexei Kosygin | Chairman, Council of Ministers | 1964–80 |
| Nikolai Podgorny | Chairman, Presidium of the Supreme Soviet | 1965–77 |
| Mikhail Suslov | Central Committee Secretary (ideology) | 1947–82 |
| Andrei Gromyko | Foreign Minister | 1957–85 |
| Dmitri Ustinov | Defence Minister | 1976–84 |
| Yuri Andropov | Chairman, KGB | 1967–82 |
The 1965 economic reforms associated with Alexei Kosygin represented the most serious Soviet attempt at economic reform between the NEP of the 1920s and the Gorbachev years. They responded to the declining rates of Soviet industrial growth from the later 1950s and drew on the ideas of the Kharkov economist Yevsei Liberman, published in Pravda in 1962.
The reforms had three main features. First, enterprise performance was to be evaluated on profitability and sales rather than on physical output alone; the supply of the target number of units would no longer satisfy the plan if the goods produced could not be sold. Second, enterprises were to retain a higher proportion of profits for investment and for bonus funds payable to workers and managers, creating material incentives for meeting targets efficiently. Third, the sovnarkhozy were abolished and central branch ministries restored, with the intention that the central ministries would concentrate on strategic planning while enterprises handled operational decisions.
Initial results were encouraging. Industrial growth improved; the 1966–70 Five-Year Plan (the Eighth) was on many measures the most successful of the post-Stalin period. From the late 1960s, however, the reforms were progressively neutralised. The central ministries resisted delegating operational control; enterprises that performed well under the new rules found their targets ratcheted up in the next plan, destroying the incentive; the Prague Spring of 1968 — in which economic liberalisation had accompanied political liberalisation in Czechoslovakia — made Soviet leadership nervous that market mechanisms would produce political consequences. By 1972 the Kosygin reforms had been substantially reversed in practice. The Ninth Five-Year Plan (1971–75) marked the beginning of the declining growth trajectory that would characterise the rest of the Brezhnev period: from approximately 5 per cent annual growth in the late 1960s to approximately 2 per cent in the late 1970s and to effective stagnation in 1980–82.
The structural problems that the reforms had sought to address worsened. Agriculture remained a chronic weakness: despite capital investment at levels unusual for an industrial economy, Soviet grain harvests oscillated wildly, and from 1973 the USSR became a permanent grain importer. The "second economy" — the unofficial exchange of goods and services alongside the planned system — expanded into a parallel institution accounting, in Western estimates, for 20–25 per cent of household income in European Russia by 1980. Consumer goods remained in chronic short supply; queues and shortages were the defining urban experience of the later Brezhnev period.
The Soviet economy was sustained through the 1970s by two external factors that masked the underlying decline. The oil-price shocks of 1973 and 1979 quadrupled and then doubled world energy prices; Soviet production from the West Siberian fields developed from the late 1960s made the Soviet Union the world's largest oil producer by 1974. Energy exports to Europe through the Druzhba ("Friendship") pipeline financed grain imports, consumer imports and the military budget. The first collapse of Soviet finances in 1986 corresponded exactly to the collapse of the oil price in that year.
The Soviet relationship with the European bloc states, defined by the events of 1956 in Hungary, was redefined in 1968 in Czechoslovakia.
The Prague Spring began in January 1968, when Alexander Dubček replaced Antonín Novotný as First Secretary of the Czechoslovak Communist Party. Dubček's programme — "socialism with a human face" — introduced press freedom, rehabilitation of victims of the 1950s trials, relaxation of travel restrictions, and a cautious decentralisation of the economy. Moscow's concern was less with the programme than with its potential demonstration effect in Ukraine, Poland, Hungary and East Germany.
On the night of 20–21 August 1968, approximately 250,000 Warsaw Pact troops — Soviet, East German (withdrawn at the last moment), Polish, Hungarian and Bulgarian — crossed into Czechoslovakia. Resistance was non-violent; Dubček was initially arrested, then permitted to return to Prague, and finally removed from the Party leadership in April 1969 and replaced by Gustáv Husák. The subsequent "normalisation" was the political regression of the 1950s without the executions: approximately 500,000 party members were expelled, the media was brought back under party control, and Czechoslovakia settled into two decades of political quiescence and industrial decline.
The invasion was justified in the "Brezhnev Doctrine", articulated by Brezhnev at the Fifth Congress of the Polish United Workers' Party in November 1968 and in a celebrated Pravda article of 26 September: the doctrine held that the achievements of socialism in any Warsaw Pact country were the common concern of all, and that the "fraternal" states were entitled to intervene to defend socialist gains against internal counter-revolution. The doctrine was never formally repudiated under Brezhnev; it was replaced in 1989 by Gorbachev's informally labelled "Sinatra Doctrine" ("they can do it their way").
Poland under Edward Gierek (First Secretary 1970–80) attempted a different strategy: Western loans financed consumer imports in an effort to buy social peace. The strategy collapsed in 1980 with the emergence of the Solidarność (Solidarity) movement under Lech Wałęsa after the Gdańsk shipyard strikes; the imposition of martial law under General Wojciech Jaruzelski in December 1981 preserved the Communist regime without Soviet direct intervention. The Polish crisis of 1980–81 was a further test of the Brezhnev Doctrine and the most visible sign — to those watching — that the Soviet bloc was approaching a crisis of legitimacy and solvency simultaneously.
Brezhnev's foreign policy toward the United States during the early 1970s represented the most substantive period of détente of the Cold War. The convergence of interests was straightforward: the Soviet Union had achieved rough nuclear parity with the United States by 1969 (ICBM numbers first exceeded those of the US that year); the United States was committed in Vietnam; both powers sought to manage the costs of the strategic competition.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.