You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Period Study "Superpower Relations and the Cold War 1941–91" is assessed in Section A of Edexcel 1HI0 Paper 2. Together with Section B (the British Depth Study), Paper 2 is worth 40% of your GCSE. Section A itself is worth 32 marks and you should spend about 50 minutes on it. The marks come from Assessment Objective 1 (knowledge and understanding) and Assessment Objective 2 (second-order concepts — causation, consequence, significance, change).
This final lesson draws together everything you have learned in the previous nine lessons and gives you the Paper 2 Section A technique you need to turn content knowledge into high-level answers. It covers the three question types, the Edexcel level language the examiners use, a worked Grade 4 / 6 / 9 example on an "importance of two events" Question 3, and the common pitfalls to avoid.
Section A of Paper 2 asks you three compulsory questions on the Period Study:
| Question | Focus | Marks | AO | Suggested time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question 1 | Explain two consequences of [X] | 8 | AO1 + AO2 | ~10 minutes |
| Question 2 | Write a narrative account analysing [Y] | 8 | AO1 + AO2 | ~12 minutes |
| Question 3 | Explain the importance of two of the following for [Z] | 16 | AO1 + AO2 | ~28 minutes |
The total is 32 marks in ~50 minutes. Leave 2–3 minutes at the end to check what you have written.
flowchart TD
A[50 mins on Section A] --> B[Q1: 10 min, 8 marks, two consequences]
A --> C[Q2: 12 min, 8 marks, narrative account]
A --> D[Q3: 28 min, 16 marks, importance of two events]
B --> E[Introduce, explain, link to event]
C --> F[Chronology with connectives]
D --> G[Short-term + long-term + judgement]
Edexcel mark schemes reward progression up four or five levels. You should be able to recognise each level and aim at the top.
| Level word | What it looks like in an answer |
|---|---|
| Basic | Simple factual statement, no explanation. "There was an airlift." |
| Simple | Correct facts, limited linkage. "The airlift delivered food to West Berlin." |
| Explained | Clear link between event and consequence or cause, supported by specific detail. "Because Stalin blockaded Berlin, the USA organised an airlift which delivered 2.3 million tonnes, saving 2.5 million West Berliners." |
| Developed | Multiple linked points, precise detail, connections across the course. "...The airlift not only saved West Berliners but was a major propaganda defeat for the USSR, accelerating the formation of NATO in April 1949." |
| Analytical | Weighs and prioritises causes or consequences, makes a judgement. "...The airlift mattered most for showing that containment would be enforced, which in turn made a formal alliance such as NATO possible." |
Writing "analytically" is the single largest jump in marks. It means explicitly weighing factors rather than simply listing them.
Question 1 asks you to explain two consequences of a named event. Consequence means something that happened because of, or as a result of, the event.
Two paragraphs, each around 80–120 words, is the right shape.
Students frequently give two versions of the same consequence. For example, on the Cuban Missile Crisis:
These are the same point. Distinct consequences would be:
Question 2 asks for a narrative account analysing how something happened. It typically covers a short period — for example, "Write a narrative account analysing how relations between the superpowers worsened in the years 1947–49" or "analysing the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis".
An analytical narrative does not simply list events. It uses connectives to make causal links explicit.
A pure narrative reads: "First X happened. Then Y happened. Then Z happened." It earns middle marks at best. To move into the top level, rewrite as: "X happened. As a consequence of X, Y became likely, because ... Once Y had happened, Z became possible, because..."
Question 3 is the longest and most important answer on Section A. You are given three events and asked to explain the importance of two of them for a named theme or development. You must choose two and defend that choice.
A student who tells the story of each event, without arguing why it mattered, sits in Level 1 or 2 regardless of how much they know. Importance is analytical: "this event mattered because..."
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.