You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Numbers tell stories — but only if you know how to read them. In the FSCE 11+ exam, you may be given tables, charts, or sets of data and asked to draw conclusions from them. This isn't just a maths skill — it's a critical thinking skill. You need to look at the data carefully and work out what it tells you AND what it doesn't tell you.
In this lesson, you'll learn how to interpret data in tables and charts, how to make correct inferences, and how to avoid common data interpretation mistakes.
Drawing conclusions from data means looking at the numbers and working out what they show. But critically, it also means recognising what the data does NOT show.
graph TD
A["Look at the data carefully"] --> B["What does the data SHOW?"]
A --> C["What does the data NOT show?"]
B --> D["Supported conclusions"]
C --> E["Things you CANNOT conclude"]
D --> F["Check: Is your conclusion justified by the numbers?"]
E --> F
F -->|Yes| G["Valid conclusion"]
F -->|No| H["Over-interpretation — be careful!"]
style G fill:#e8f5e9
style H fill:#fce4ec
When you see a data table, follow these steps:
Table: Number of books read by students in Year 6 during one term
| Student | Fiction | Non-fiction | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amira | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| Ben | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Charlotte | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| David | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Eva | 10 | 2 | 12 |
What the data shows:
What the data does NOT show:
Table: Average temperature in London (°C) by month
| Month | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp (°C) | 5 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 19 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 5 |
Conclusions that CAN be drawn:
Conclusions that CANNOT be drawn:
Table: Favourite sport by gender (survey of 200 Year 6 students)
| Sport | Boys | Girls | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Football | 45 | 20 | 65 |
| Swimming | 15 | 30 | 45 |
| Tennis | 10 | 15 | 25 |
| Gymnastics | 5 | 25 | 30 |
| Athletics | 20 | 15 | 35 |
| Total | 95 | 105 | 200 |
Valid conclusions:
Invalid conclusions:
Table: School absence rates (%)
| Year | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| School A | 5.2 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 3.5 |
| School B | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 6.5 |
Question: "What conclusions can you draw from this data?"
Before (a student who over-interprets): "School A is getting better and School B is getting worse. School A must have a better headteacher."
This answer makes assumptions about WHY the numbers changed.
After (a student who interprets carefully): "School A's absence rate has decreased steadily from 5.2% in 2020 to 3.5% in 2023, which is a positive trend. School B had a stable absence rate around 3% from 2020 to 2022, but it more than doubled to 6.5% in 2023, which is a sharp increase. However, the data doesn't tell us WHY these changes happened. The increase at School B in 2023 could be due to an illness outbreak, changes in the school's policy, or other factors we can't determine from this data alone."
Statement: "Crime in Littletown increased by 100% last year!"
This sounds terrifying. But what if the actual numbers were:
A 100% increase sounds dramatic, but going from 2 to 4 crimes in a whole town is not particularly alarming. Percentages without context can be misleading.
Similarly: "Our product is 50% more effective!" — 50% more effective than what? Than doing nothing? Than a competitor? Without knowing the baseline, the percentage is meaningless.
Chart description: "A bar chart shows the amount of rainfall (in mm) for a town over six months. January: 80mm, February: 65mm, March: 50mm, April: 45mm, May: 40mm, June: 30mm."
Analysis:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.