You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Non-fiction texts are based on real events, real people, and real information. In the FSCE 11+ exam, you may be asked to read and answer questions about newspaper articles, letters, speeches, biographies, travel writing, advertisements, reports, or information texts. Understanding non-fiction is different from understanding fiction -- you need to think about the author's purpose, the intended audience, and how information is organised and presented.
This lesson will teach you how to read non-fiction passages effectively and answer questions about them with confidence.
When you read any non-fiction passage, you should identify these four things:
Why was this text written? Every non-fiction text has a purpose. The most common purposes are:
Many texts have more than one purpose. A newspaper article might inform and persuade at the same time.
Who is this text written for? Think about:
The tone is the attitude or feeling behind the writing. Is the author:
What are the main points the text is making? Non-fiction texts contain facts, opinions, arguments, and details. You need to be able to pick out the most important information and separate facts from opinions.
graph TD
A["Read Non-Fiction Text"] --> B["Identify PURPOSE"]
A --> C["Identify AUDIENCE"]
A --> D["Identify TONE"]
A --> E["Extract KEY INFORMATION"]
B --> F["Inform? Persuade? Entertain? Advise?"]
C --> G["Who is this written for?"]
D --> H["What attitude does the writer show?"]
E --> I["What are the main facts and opinions?"]
One of the most important skills in reading non-fiction is telling the difference between facts and opinions.
In the FSCE exam, you may be asked to identify facts and opinions, or to explain how an author uses them to persuade the reader.
Read the following newspaper article, then study the questions and model answers.
SCHOOL BANS SMARTPHONES TO BOOST LEARNING
Greenfield Academy has become the latest school to ban smartphones during the school day, joining a growing number of schools across England taking action against mobile phone use.
Head teacher Mrs Patel announced the policy at Monday's assembly, telling pupils that phones would be collected at the start of each day and returned at 3:15 pm. "Research shows that smartphones are a major distraction," she said. "Since we trialled the ban last term, homework completion rates have risen by 22% and behaviour incidents have dropped by a third."
Not everyone is happy with the decision. Year 6 pupil Jake Morrison said: "It's not fair. I need my phone to message my mum if I'm staying for clubs after school." Parent governor Lisa Thornton added: "While I understand the intention, some parents rely on being able to contact their children during the day."
However, educational psychologist Dr Sarah Wen supports the move. "Children's brains are still developing," she explained. "Constant notifications fragment their attention and reduce their ability to concentrate for extended periods. Schools that remove this distraction consistently see improvements in academic performance."
Strong answer: "The main purpose of this article is to inform readers about Greenfield Academy's decision to ban smartphones during the school day. The article presents facts about the policy (phones collected at the start of the day and returned at 3:15 pm), statistics showing the impact of the ban (homework completion up 22%, behaviour incidents down by a third), and includes viewpoints from different people -- the head teacher, a pupil, a parent, and a psychologist. By presenting multiple perspectives, the article also helps readers form their own opinion on the issue."
Strong answer: "A fact from the article is that 'homework completion rates have risen by 22%' -- this is a measurable statistic that can be verified. An opinion is Jake Morrison's comment that 'It's not fair,' because this is his personal feeling about the ban, not something that can be proved."
Strong answer: "The article presents a balanced view by including opinions from people on both sides of the debate. On one side, Mrs Patel and Dr Sarah Wen support the ban, providing evidence that it improves learning and concentration. On the other side, pupil Jake Morrison and parent governor Lisa Thornton express concerns, arguing that phones are needed for practical communication. By including both positive and negative viewpoints, the article allows readers to weigh up the arguments and decide for themselves."
Read the following letter, then study the questions and model answers.
Dear Editor,
I am writing to express my deep concern about the planned closure of Riverside Library. This library is not just a building full of books -- it is the beating heart of our community.
Every week, over 300 children attend reading groups, homework clubs, and storytelling sessions at Riverside. For many families, it is the only quiet space where children can study. Where are these children supposed to go? The nearest alternative library is seven miles away -- an impossible distance for families without cars.
The council claims it will save £85,000 a year by closing the library. But what is the cost of a generation of children growing up without access to books? What is the cost of a community losing its gathering place? Some savings are not worth making.
I urge every resident to attend the council meeting on 15th March and make their voice heard. Our library is worth fighting for.
Yours faithfully, Margaret Hughes
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.