You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Let us be completely honest: when you sit the FSCE 11+ exam, you will encounter questions that look different from anything you have practised. This is not a bug — it is a feature. The FSCE deliberately changes its format each year to test how well you handle new situations. This means that the ability to approach unfamiliar questions calmly and strategically is perhaps the single most important skill you can develop.
Here is the reassuring truth: unfamiliar questions are not testing unfamiliar skills. They are testing the same reading, writing, reasoning, and problem-solving skills you already have — just in a new wrapper. A question about interpreting a graph might look different from a question about interpreting a poem, but both require the same core skill: reading carefully and drawing conclusions from the information given.
When you encounter a question that looks unfamiliar, follow these five steps:
Read the entire question slowly and carefully. Do not skim. Do not panic. Read every word, including any instructions or information that comes before the actual question.
Underline or circle the key instruction words. What is the question actually asking you to do? Is it asking you to calculate, explain, compare, describe, evaluate, or create? There is a big difference between these, and getting this right is half the battle.
Look at the question and ask yourself: "What do I already know that could help me here?" Even if the question looks unfamiliar, it will connect to skills and knowledge you already have. Maybe it involves fractions, or vocabulary, or understanding a character's feelings. Identify the familiar elements within the unfamiliar format.
Do not sit and stare at the question. Start writing something. If it is a maths problem, try a calculation. If it is a comprehension question, write your first thoughts. Often, the act of starting helps your brain make connections and find the answer. You can always cross things out and try again.
Once you have an answer, quickly check: Does it make sense? Does it actually answer the question that was asked? Have you shown your reasoning?
flowchart TD
A["See Unfamiliar Question"] --> B["Step 1: Read Carefully"]
B --> C["Step 2: Identify What Is Being Asked"]
C --> D["Step 3: Find What You Know"]
D --> E["Step 4: Try Something"]
E --> F["Step 5: Check Your Answer"]
F --> G{"Does it make sense?"}
G -->|Yes| H["Move to next question"]
G -->|No| I["Try a different approach"]
I --> E
Feeling panicked when you see an unfamiliar question is completely natural. Your brain is saying, "I have not seen this before — danger!" But you can train yourself to respond differently.
You have never seen an infographic in an exam before. The paper shows you an illustrated chart about plastic pollution in the ocean, with icons, percentages, and short captions.
Question: "Using the information in the infographic, explain why reducing plastic bag use would have a smaller impact on ocean pollution than most people think. Use specific data from the infographic in your answer."
Step 1 (Read carefully): The question is about plastic bags specifically, not plastic in general. It wants you to explain why the impact would be smaller than expected.
Step 2 (Identify what is being asked): The key words are "explain why" and "smaller impact than most people think." You need to find data about plastic bags in the infographic and compare it to other sources of plastic pollution.
Step 3 (Find what you know): You know how to read charts and find specific information. You know how to compare numbers and percentages. You know how to write an explanation.
Step 4 (Try something): Looking at the infographic, you notice that plastic bags make up only 3% of ocean plastic, while fishing nets make up 46%. Most people think of plastic bags when they think of ocean pollution, but the data shows they are a very small part of the problem.
Step 5 (Check): Your answer uses specific data (3% vs 46%), explains the contrast between perception and reality, and directly answers the question. Good.
Model answer: "According to the infographic, plastic bags make up just 3% of plastic pollution in the ocean, making them one of the smallest categories shown. In contrast, fishing equipment accounts for 46% of ocean plastic. Most people associate ocean pollution with plastic bags because they are visible in everyday life and feature heavily in campaigns, but the data shows that even eliminating all plastic bags would only remove a tiny fraction of the total problem. This means that while reducing plastic bag use is worthwhile, focusing only on bags would miss the much larger sources of pollution."
Question: In a coded language, the following is true:
What does "coda" mean?
Step 1: Read all three coded phrases carefully.
Step 2: The question asks you to work out what a specific word means by comparing the coded phrases.
Step 3: You know how to compare and look for patterns. This is like solving a puzzle.
Step 4: Let me compare the phrases:
Step 5: Let me verify. If "coda" means "tall," then in the first phrase, "bip" and "ram" mean "three" and "trees" (in some order). In the second phrase, "ram" and "tika" and "bip" mean "three," "green," and "birds." "ram" and "bip" appear in both, and "three" appears in both translations, which is consistent. "tika" appears in phrases 2 and 3, and "green" appears in both translations, so "tika" means "green." Everything checks out.
Answer: "Coda" means "tall."
Question: Read this conversation between two characters:
"You're going then," said Mrs Abbott. She did not look up from her knitting. "I thought I might," said David. "Thought you might," she repeated. There was a long silence. "I'll write," he said. "Will you." It was not a question.
How does Mrs Abbott feel about David leaving? Use evidence from the dialogue to support your answer.
Step 1: This is a comprehension question about emotions, but the emotions are shown through behaviour and speech rather than stated directly.
Step 2: I need to identify Mrs Abbott's feelings and find evidence in the text.
Step 3: I know how to infer emotions from actions and dialogue. This is a reading skill I have practised.
Step 4: Mrs Abbott does not look up from her knitting — this could mean she is upset and does not want David to see, or that she is pretending not to care. She repeats his words ("Thought you might") which shows she is hurt or sceptical. "Will you" is said as a statement, not a question — she does not believe he will write. The long silence shows tension and unspoken emotion.
Model answer: "Mrs Abbott is deeply hurt by David's decision to leave, but she is trying to hide her feelings. She 'did not look up from her knitting,' using the activity as a shield so David cannot see her face. When she repeats his words — 'Thought you might' — the repetition sounds hollow and bitter, as if she expected this but is still disappointed. The most revealing detail is that 'Will you' is not a question — the writer tells us this explicitly. Mrs Abbott does not believe David will write, suggesting she feels she is being abandoned. The 'long silence' between them carries the weight of everything they are not saying to each other."
Question: Two schools conducted surveys about students' favourite subjects.
School A (200 students): Maths 25%, English 20%, Science 30%, Art 15%, PE 10% School B (150 students): Maths 30%, English 10%, Science 20%, Art 20%, PE 20%
Raj says, "More students at School A like Maths than at School B." Is Raj correct? Show your working.
Step 1: This looks like a straightforward maths question, but there is a catch — the schools have different numbers of students.
Step 2: I need to compare actual numbers, not just percentages.
Step 3: I know how to calculate percentages of a number. 25% of 200 vs 30% of 150.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.