You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Beyond basic figurative language, there are more advanced literary devices and rhetorical techniques that authors use to create powerful effects. In the FSCE 11+ comprehension exam, you may need to identify these techniques and explain why the author has used them. In the writing section, using them yourself will make your work stand out.
Literary devices are techniques that authors use to create particular effects in their writing — to build atmosphere, develop characters, or deepen meaning.
Rhetorical techniques are methods used to persuade, argue, or influence the reader. They are especially common in speeches, newspaper articles, and persuasive writing.
Definition: Using the weather or environment to reflect the mood or emotions of a character or scene.
Examples:
Effect: Pathetic fallacy reinforces the mood of a scene, making the reader feel the emotions more strongly. It creates atmosphere and helps the reader connect with the characters' feelings.
Definition: Hints or clues early in a text about something that will happen later.
Examples:
Effect: Foreshadowing creates suspense and tension. It makes the reader want to keep reading to find out what happens. It also makes events feel more satisfying when they occur, because the reader has been subtly prepared.
There are three types of irony you should know:
Dramatic irony: When the reader (or audience) knows something a character does not.
Situational irony: When the opposite of what you expect actually happens.
Verbal irony: When someone says the opposite of what they mean (often sarcasm).
Effect: Irony creates humour, tension, or thoughtfulness. It makes the reader think more deeply about a situation and often adds layers of meaning.
Definition: Deliberately repeating a word, phrase, or structure for emphasis.
Examples:
Effect: Repetition hammers a point home. It makes key ideas memorable and creates rhythm and emotional power.
Definition: Questions asked for effect, not to get an actual answer. The answer is obvious or the writer wants the reader to think.
Examples:
Effect: Rhetorical questions make the reader think about the issue personally. They draw the reader in and make them feel involved in the argument.
Definition: Grouping words, phrases, or ideas in threes for maximum impact.
Examples:
Effect: Threes create rhythm and emphasis. They feel complete and satisfying to the reader. Ideas presented in threes are more memorable than pairs or lists of four.
Definition: Words deliberately chosen to make the reader feel a strong emotion (anger, sadness, sympathy, fear, etc.).
Examples:
Effect: Emotive language manipulates the reader's feelings. It is especially powerful in persuasive writing, where the writer wants the reader to care about an issue.
Definition: A short, personal story used to illustrate a point or make an argument more relatable.
Examples:
Effect: Anecdotes make arguments personal and relatable. They help the reader connect with the writer and understand the real-world impact of an issue.
graph TD
A["Reading a passage?<br/>Ask yourself:"] --> B["Is the weather/setting<br/>matching the mood?"]
B -- "Yes" --> B1["PATHETIC FALLACY"]
A --> C["Are there hints about<br/>what will happen later?"]
C -- "Yes" --> C1["FORESHADOWING"]
A --> D["Is the outcome the<br/>opposite of what you’d expect?"]
D -- "Yes" --> D1["IRONY"]
A --> E["Is a word or phrase<br/>repeated deliberately?"]
E -- "Yes" --> E1["REPETITION"]
A --> F["Is a question asked<br/>that doesn’t need an answer?"]
F -- "Yes" --> F1["RHETORICAL QUESTION"]
A --> G["Are ideas grouped<br/>in threes?"]
G -- "Yes" --> G1["RULE OF THREE"]
A --> H["Are words chosen to<br/>make you feel something?"]
H -- "Yes" --> H1["EMOTIVE LANGUAGE"]
A --> I["Is there a short<br/>personal story?"]
I -- "Yes" --> I1["ANECDOTE"]
Passage: As the team walked off the pitch after their devastating defeat, heavy rain began to fall, and the grey sky seemed to weep with them.
Analysis: The author uses pathetic fallacy — the "heavy rain" and "grey sky" mirror the team's sadness after losing. The sky "weeping" is also personification, making it seem as if nature itself shares the team's grief. This deepens the emotional impact of the defeat and creates a powerful sense of shared sorrow.
Passage: "Don't worry," laughed Tom, climbing higher up the crumbling wall. "Nothing could possibly go wrong!" Below, his sister watched nervously, her hands pressed against her mouth.
Analysis: Tom's words — "Nothing could possibly go wrong!" — are foreshadowing combined with dramatic irony. The reader can tell from the "crumbling wall" and the sister's nervous reaction that something bad IS about to happen. Tom's confidence creates tension because the reader knows more than he does. This makes the reader anxious to find out what will happen next.
Passage: These innocent animals are trapped, tortured, and killed — and nobody is doing anything to stop it.
Analysis: The author uses the rule of three — "trapped, tortured, and killed" — to build a powerful list that increases in severity. Each word is more shocking than the last. The word "innocent" is emotive language, making the reader feel sympathy for the animals and anger at those responsible. The final phrase — "nobody is doing anything" — makes the reader feel guilty and motivated to act.
Passage: Last year, my grandmother slipped on the icy pavement outside her house and broke her hip. She was in hospital for three weeks. Is this really acceptable in the 21st century? Should we not be doing more to keep our streets safe for everyone?
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.