You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Non-fiction writers frequently use persuasive techniques to influence the reader's opinions, emotions, and actions. Recognising and analysing these techniques is essential for Paper 2 Section A, particularly for Q3 (language analysis) and Q4 (comparing viewpoints). This lesson provides a comprehensive guide to the persuasive devices you are most likely to encounter.
Many of the texts on Paper 2 are persuasive in nature — speeches, opinion articles, letters to newspapers, travel writing, and campaign literature all aim to influence the reader. Even texts that seem primarily descriptive or informative often contain persuasive elements.
Being able to identify and analyse persuasive techniques will help you:
A question asked for effect, not expecting a literal answer. It forces the reader to think and often implies the answer.
"Are we really prepared to sit back and watch our children's future crumble?"
Effect: Provokes thought, creates a sense of urgency, and implies that inaction is unacceptable. The word "really" challenges the reader's complacency.
Words chosen to provoke an emotional response — sympathy, anger, guilt, fear, or hope.
"The starving child reached out a skeletal hand."
Effect: Creates vivid, disturbing imagery that provokes sympathy and potentially guilt in the reader. "Skeletal" is more powerful than "thin" because it connotes death and suffering.
Numerical evidence used to add authority and make an argument seem objective and irrefutable.
"87% of young people report feeling anxious about climate change."
Effect: Gives the argument concrete weight. The specific percentage makes the claim seem researched and credible, leaving little room for the reader to dismiss it.
Short personal stories used to illustrate a point and make it relatable.
"My grandmother grew up in a two-room house with no running water. She walked three miles to school each day."
Effect: Makes the argument personal and human. Readers connect with stories more than statistics alone. Anecdotes make abstract issues concrete and real.
Using "you" or "we" to speak directly to the reader or create a sense of shared experience.
"You know this is wrong. We all know."
Effect: Creates a personal connection; makes the reader feel addressed and involved. "We all" creates a sense of community and shared responsibility.
Repeating words or phrases for emphasis and rhythm.
"We will fight for justice. We will fight for equality. We will fight for the future."
Effect: Creates a powerful, rhythmic quality that builds momentum and makes the message memorable. The repeated "We will fight" creates determination and unity.
Deliberate exaggeration to emphasise a point.
"This is the greatest challenge humanity has ever faced."
Effect: Emphasises the significance of the issue. Forces the reader to take it seriously, even if the claim is debatable.
Placing opposing ideas together to highlight differences.
"While CEOs enjoy bonuses of millions, their workers struggle to feed their families."
Effect: Creates a stark, powerful contrast that exposes inequality. Provokes anger or a sense of injustice in the reader.
Using first-person plural pronouns to create a sense of unity.
"This is our planet. Our responsibility. Our legacy."
Effect: Creates a collective identity and shared ownership of the problem. Makes the reader feel part of a group working together.
Citing experts, organisations, or authoritative sources to bolster an argument.
"According to the World Health Organisation, air pollution causes seven million premature deaths each year."
Effect: Adds credibility. The reader is more likely to accept a claim if it comes from a recognised authority.
Using verbs that command or instruct the reader.
"Act now. Donate today. Make a difference."
Effect: Creates urgency and directness. The reader is told what to do, which can prompt immediate action.
Listing three items or ideas for rhythmic emphasis.
"Education, opportunity, and equality."
Effect: Creates a memorable, rhythmic pattern. Three items feel complete and balanced, making the argument sound definitive.
flowchart TB
Persuade[Writer's persuasive purpose]
Persuade --> Logic[Appeal to logic]
Persuade --> Emotion[Appeal to emotion]
Persuade --> Ethics[Appeal to authority]
Logic --> L1[Statistics + facts]
Logic --> L2[Contrast + antithesis]
Emotion --> E1[Emotive language]
Emotion --> E2[Anecdotes]
Emotion --> E3[Hyperbole]
Ethics --> Et1[Expert opinion]
Ethics --> Et2[Inclusive 'we']
Ethics --> Et3[Imperatives + rhetorical Qs]
The most effective persuasive writing uses multiple techniques in combination. Here is an example:
"Every day, 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth. Eight hundred mothers. Eight hundred families torn apart. How long will we look the other way? This is not a distant problem — this is a human catastrophe happening right now, and we have the power to stop it."
| Technique | Example in the Extract |
|---|---|
| Statistic | "800 women die" |
| Repetition | "Eight hundred mothers. Eight hundred families" |
| Emotive language | "torn apart," "human catastrophe" |
| Rhetorical question | "How long will we look the other way?" |
| Contrast | "not a distant problem" vs "happening right now" |
| Direct address | "we have the power to stop it" |
Exam Tip: In the exam, don't just name one technique — show how multiple techniques work together to build the writer's argument. This demonstrates sophisticated analysis and moves you towards the top marks.
When you identify a persuasive technique, always follow these steps:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.