You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Question 2 is worth 8 marks and tests your ability to summarise and synthesise information from both texts. This is assessed under AO1 and requires you to identify similarities and/or differences between the two sources on a specific topic.
A typical Q2 might read:
You need to refer to Source A and Source B for this question. Use details from both sources. Write a summary of the differences between [topic in Source A] and [topic in Source B].
The question will always direct you to both sources and specify a focus (e.g. the writers' experiences of travel, their descriptions of childhood, their attitudes to education).
| Requirement | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Refer to BOTH sources | You must write about Source A AND Source B — do not focus on only one |
| Synthesise, don't just list | Make connections between the texts — compare or contrast the information |
| Use textual references | Support your points with short quotations or paraphrased evidence from both texts |
| Focus on the specified topic | Only write about what the question asks — stay on topic |
| Identify differences/similarities | The question usually asks for differences, but be prepared for similarities or both |
Synthesis means combining information from two texts to form a new understanding. It is more than just describing what each text says — it involves connecting and comparing the information.
| Not Synthesis (Description) | Synthesis (Comparison) |
|---|---|
| "In Source A, the writer describes the city as exciting." | "While the writer in Source A describes the city as exciting, the writer in Source B presents it as overwhelming and hostile." |
| "Source B says the journey was difficult." | "Both writers experience hardship, but whereas Source A's writer finds it invigorating, Source B's writer finds it demoralising." |
Write 2–3 developed paragraphs, each making a clear comparison between the two sources.
| Showing Differences | Showing Similarities |
|---|---|
| However, in contrast, whereas, on the other hand | Similarly, likewise, both writers, in the same way |
| Unlike Source A, Source B... | Source A and Source B both... |
| While Source A suggests..., Source B implies... | Like Source A, Source B also... |
Question: Write a summary of the differences between the writers' experiences of school.
Sources:
Answer:
The writers present starkly different experiences of school. In Source A, the school is described as "buzzing with energy," with students using tablets and working in groups, suggesting a collaborative and stimulating environment. In contrast, Source B describes a classroom where children sat "in silence, row upon row," and learning consisted of "repeating dates and facts until they were branded into memory." This implies a rigid, joyless approach to education where individuality was suppressed.
The writers also differ in their portrayal of the relationship between teachers and students. Source A presents teachers who "moved between groups, encouraging and questioning," suggesting an equal, supportive dynamic. Source B, however, describes a teacher who "stood at the front with a cane across the desk," and children who "dared not speak unless spoken to." The language of fear in Source B — "dared not" — contrasts sharply with the encouraging language of Source A, highlighting how dramatically the educational experience has changed over time.
flowchart LR
A["Detail from<br/>Source A"]
B["Detail from<br/>Source B"]
A --> Combine["Combine in one sentence<br/>using a comparative<br/>connective"]
B --> Combine
Combine --> Inference["Inferred difference<br/>or similarity<br/>about content"]
Inference --> Mark["Q2 synthesis paragraph<br/>8 marks · AO1"]
Q2 does not require you to analyse language techniques in detail. Unlike Q3, you do not need to write PEE paragraphs or discuss the effect of metaphors and similes. The focus is on what the texts say (content and information), not how they say it (language and technique).
However, you can use short quotations to support your comparisons — just don't turn your answer into a language analysis essay.
| Mistake | Why It Costs Marks |
|---|---|
| Only writing about one source | You must refer to both sources — writing about one earns very few marks |
| Writing separate paragraphs for each source | Synthesise — compare within the same paragraph, not in isolation |
| Turning it into a language analysis | Q2 is about content and summary, not technique analysis |
| Not using quotations | Textual references are needed to support your points |
| Going off topic | Only write about what the question specifies |
Exam Tip: Think of Q2 as a "compare the content" question. What do the texts say? How are their accounts similar or different? Use comparison connectives to show you are synthesising.
Spend approximately 10 minutes on Q2. Write 2–3 clear paragraphs with references to both texts. Then move on to Q3, where the marks are higher.
Question 2 tests your ability to summarise and synthesise information from both sources. The key skill is comparison — connecting information from Source A and Source B to identify similarities and differences. Use comparison connectives, refer to both texts in every paragraph, and focus on content rather than language analysis. Aim for 2–3 well-structured paragraphs in about 10 minutes.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.