You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Context is the Assessment Objective that most students either overdo or underdo. Some stuff their essays with historical facts. Others forget it entirely. Neither earns marks. AO3 — the relationship between a text and the conditions in which it was written — is worth between 15 and 20 per cent of your overall grade, depending on your board, and it is the AO with the clearest dividing line between mid-band and top-band responses.
This lesson will teach you the single most important thing about context: it is a lens, not a footnote.
Let's start with the exact wording of the Assessment Objective:
AO3: Show understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written.
Notice what the AO does not ask. It does not ask you to recall biographical facts about the author. It does not ask you to list historical events surrounding the text. It asks for understanding of relationships. A relationship requires two things in contact with each other — the text and the context — not a paragraph about each.
Most students learn context as memorised chunks: Dickens grew up in poverty; Shakespeare wrote under James I who believed in witches; Priestley was a socialist; Stevenson wrote in the era of Darwin. These are not wrong. They are just not analysis.
A bolt-on context paragraph looks like this:
A Christmas Carol was written in 1843 by Charles Dickens. Dickens grew up poor and worked in a blacking factory as a child, which made him sympathetic to the poor. At this time, Britain was industrialising and there was a large gap between rich and poor. Dickens wanted to criticise rich people for not helping the poor. This is why he wrote A Christmas Carol.
Every sentence in that paragraph is correct. Every sentence is also disconnected from any actual moment in the text. The paragraph could be pasted into an essay on any Dickens novel. It is context standing alone, not context doing work. Low Band 2, maybe Band 3. AO3 in name only.
Now the same writer, same knowledge, but integrating context into analysis.
Scrooge's dismissal of the charity collectors — "Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?" — is not Dickens inventing a villain but Dickens quoting the political economy of his own decade. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 had instituted the workhouses that Scrooge names, and Malthus's prediction that charity to the poor only encouraged their reproduction lay behind Scrooge's later phrase "decrease the surplus population". Dickens is not just writing a grumpy man; he is staging, inside Scrooge's mouth, the dominant intellectual justifications for letting the poor die, and then subjecting those justifications to the supernatural machinery of the novella until Scrooge can no longer hold them.
Same historical facts — 1834, Malthus, workhouses — but now they are inside the analysis of a specific quotation. The context is the lens through which we understand Scrooge's language. This is how AO3 earns marks at the top end.
Here is a diagnostic. Take a passage of your essay that includes context. Delete the context. Read what's left. Does the analysis still make sense? If yes, the context was a bolt-on. If no — if the analysis collapses without the context because the context was explaining why the writer made this choice — then the context is integrated, and earning marks.
There are three kinds of context worth bringing into a GCSE literature essay. Any of them, used well, can earn top-band AO3.
The conditions the text was written in: political events, social movements, economic realities, scientific debates. This is what most students reach for. It earns marks when it explains something specific about the text.
Macbeth: James I wrote Daemonologie and believed witches threatened the body politic; the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 brought anxieties about regicide to the surface; the doctrine of the divine right of kings meant that killing a king was also a metaphysical offence. These contexts are not decoration. They directly explain why the witches in Macbeth have authority, why Duncan's murder produces cosmic disturbance ("the obscure bird clamoured the livelong night"), and why the restoration of Malcolm feels like the restoration of natural order.
Jekyll and Hyde: Darwin's Origin of Species (1859) had destabilised Victorian certainties about the human as a distinct moral creature; Freud's early work on the unconscious was emerging in the same decade; Lombroso's criminology claimed to read criminality from the shape of the face. All three contexts illuminate Stevenson's description of Hyde as "troglodytic" and the narrators' inability to describe him fully.
An Inspector Calls: Priestley wrote in 1945 but set the play in 1912, and the gap is the point — the audience knows what Birling does not, that two world wars, the sinking of the Titanic, and the 1929 crash are all ahead. This dramatic irony only works because Priestley is staging 1912 as a judgement on 1945's choices.
The conventions the writer is using, adapting, or subverting. Genre expectations. Earlier writers the text is in dialogue with. The tradition the text belongs to.
A Christmas Carol is a ghost story, but Dickens places it inside the emerging convention of the sentimental reform novel. The ghosts are borrowed from Gothic but used for moral diagnosis.
Romeo and Juliet belongs to the tradition of the sonnet sequence and borrows the Petrarchan imagery of the cold mistress and the burning lover, which Shakespeare then collapses by making Juliet answer back in her own sonnet.
Power and Conflict poems (Ozymandias, Storm on the Island, Bayonet Charge, Kamikaze) sit within the long English tradition of poetry about state violence, from Blake's London to Owen's Dulce et Decorum Est.
Blood Brothers is a modern working-class tragedy written in the shadow of Shakespeare's tragic form — Mrs Johnstone as Fate-figure, the Narrator as Chorus, the inevitability announced at the start.
Literary context is often the highest-quality context at GCSE because it rewards reading. A student who has noticed that Macbeth's witches echo the Norns of Norse myth, or that Hyde's laboratory recalls Frankenstein's workshop, is showing literary awareness rather than memorised biography.
How the text was received by its original audience and how it is received now. What the writer seems to have intended. How interpretations have changed. This is the most sophisticated kind of context and the one most likely to push a Grade 8 essay to a Grade 9.
An Inspector Calls was received differently in 1946 (when the welfare state was being built and the play's socialism was the political orthodoxy) than it is now (when inequality has reopened). Students who can note this earn Grade 9 credit.
Curley's wife has been read by earlier generations as a temptress, and by later generations as a woman trapped in a sexist text; the shift in reading is itself part of the text's meaning.
Macbeth's Lady Macbeth is sometimes read as a fiend, sometimes as a feminist figure trapped in a patriarchal world, sometimes as Shakespeare's experiment in what ambition looks like when freed from gendered convention. You do not need to pick one. Acknowledging the range is a Grade 9 move.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.