You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Understanding the context of Macbeth is essential for achieving top marks at GCSE. The examiner wants to see that you can connect Shakespeare's choices to the world he was writing in. This lesson covers Shakespeare's life, the Jacobean era, and why Macbeth was the perfect play for its time.
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Born | 1564, Stratford-upon-Avon |
| Died | 1616 |
| Theatre | The Globe Theatre, London |
| Company | The King's Men (from 1603) |
| Macbeth written | c. 1606 |
| Macbeth genre | Tragedy |
Shakespeare wrote Macbeth around 1606, shortly after James I came to the English throne (1603). The play was almost certainly performed for James himself.
The Jacobean era (from the Latin Jacobus = James) began when James VI of Scotland became James I of England in 1603, uniting the two crowns.
One of the most important contextual ideas for Macbeth is the Divine Right of Kings:
The monarch is chosen by God and answerable only to God. To challenge the king is to challenge God himself.
This belief underpins the entire moral framework of the play. When Macbeth murders Duncan, he is not merely committing murder — he is committing an act against the natural and divine order.
Jacobeans believed in a cosmic hierarchy called the Great Chain of Being:
God
|
Angels
|
The Monarch
|
Nobility
|
Gentry
|
Commoners
|
Animals
|
Plants
|
Minerals
When Macbeth kills Duncan, he breaks this chain. Shakespeare dramatises the consequences: nature itself is thrown into chaos — storms, unnatural darkness, horses eating each other.
Examiner's tip: Always link the Great Chain of Being to specific moments in the play. For example, when Ross describes how "darkness does the face of earth entomb" (Act 2, Scene 4), this reflects the Jacobean belief that regicide would cause cosmic disorder.
James I is crucial to understanding Macbeth for several reasons:
Just a year before Macbeth was written, Guy Fawkes and a group of Catholic conspirators attempted to blow up Parliament and kill King James. This event terrified England and made the themes of regicide (king-killing) and treason intensely relevant.
Shakespeare's portrayal of Macbeth as a regicide who suffers terrible consequences would have pleased James — it served as a warning against treason.
James I wrote a book called Daemonologie (1597), which argued that witches were real, dangerous, and in league with the Devil. He even personally interrogated accused witches.
Shakespeare includes the Weird Sisters (witches) partly to flatter James's known interest.
James was a Scottish king. By setting the play in Scotland and basing it loosely on the historical Scottish king Macbeth (from Holinshed's Chronicles), Shakespeare was flattering his patron.
According to legend, James I was descended from Banquo. In the play, Banquo is noble, loyal, and resists evil — Shakespeare deliberately portrays him favourably to flatter the king.
Examiner's tip: When writing about context, avoid simply listing facts. Instead, show how the context shaped Shakespeare's choices. For example: "Shakespeare portrays Banquo as morally upright partly because James I believed Banquo was his ancestor; presenting Banquo as corrupt would have insulted the king."
In Jacobean England:
In Macbeth, the witches (the Weird Sisters) embody these fears. They are ambiguous — Shakespeare never makes it entirely clear whether they control Macbeth's fate or merely reveal what he already desires.
| Interpretation | Evidence |
|---|---|
| The witches control Macbeth's fate | They seek him out; their prophecies all come true |
| Macbeth already harboured ambition | He immediately thinks of murder — "why do I yield to that suggestion" (1.3) |
| The witches are agents of chaos | "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" (1.1) — they invert natural order |
Shakespeare wrote Macbeth for several interconnected reasons:
Shakespeare's audience at the Globe Theatre was diverse:
| Section | Audience | Price |
|---|---|---|
| The Pit | Groundlings (standing) | 1 penny |
| Lower gallery | Middle class (seated) | 2 pennies |
| Upper gallery | Wealthier patrons | 3 pennies |
| Lord's rooms | Nobility | 6 pennies |
The play also received court performances for King James. Shakespeare had to appeal to both the groundlings (who wanted spectacle and violence) and the educated elite (who appreciated moral and political complexity).
Macbeth is a tragedy — a genre with specific conventions:
| Convention | How Macbeth fulfils it |
|---|---|
| Noble protagonist | Macbeth begins as a brave, respected warrior and thane |
| Fatal flaw (hamartia) | Macbeth's "vaulting ambition" (1.7) |
| Reversal of fortune | From honoured hero to despised tyrant |
| Suffering | Guilt, paranoia, isolation, madness |
| Catastrophe (death) | Macbeth is killed by Macduff; order is restored |
Examiner's tip: Use the term hamartia (tragic flaw) in your essays — it shows sophisticated understanding of the genre. You could write: "Shakespeare presents Macbeth's hamartia as his 'vaulting ambition', which drives him to commit regicide and ultimately leads to his destruction."
Question: How does Shakespeare use the opening of Macbeth to reflect Jacobean anxieties about disorder?
Shakespeare opens Macbeth with a stage saturated in disorder: "thunder and lightning" frame the Witches as instruments of cosmic disturbance, and their paradoxical couplet "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" inverts the moral and political certainties a Jacobean audience would have taken for granted. The chiasmus collapses opposites into one another, suggesting a world in which the divinely ordained categories that underpinned James I's claim to authority are no longer stable. For an audience still shaken by the Gunpowder Plot of 1605, the sight of supernatural figures openly conspiring against the natural order would have evoked the same fear as the plotters who had attempted to detonate parliament: both groups seek to collapse the hierarchy that, according to the Great Chain of Being, bound God, king, and subject into one continuous order. Shakespeare's choice to place the Witches before the human cast structurally privileges chaos; order, represented by Duncan, arrives second and is therefore already framed as vulnerable. The trochaic rhythm of the Witches' verse ("When shall we three meet again") further isolates them from the iambic patterns of the court, marking them as linguistic as well as moral outsiders. In this single scene, Shakespeare stages the central Jacobean fear — that a legitimate kingdom can be unmade by forces that work invisibly beneath the surface of appearance — and prepares the audience for a tragedy in which the consequences of that unmaking are followed unflinchingly to their end.
Sub-question: How does context shape our understanding of the Witches?
Grade 4 response (simple, explicit):
The Witches are important because people in Shakespeare's time believed in witches. King James I wrote a book about witches called Daemonologie. He thought witches were dangerous. So when the audience saw the Witches, they would be scared. This shows that Shakespeare included them to interest the king and the audience.
Commentary: This response identifies a relevant contextual fact (James's Daemonologie) and links it to audience reaction, which secures AO3. However, references are "simple and explicit" in AQA Level 2 terms: the student gestures at context but does not integrate it with language analysis, and the writing remains summary-like rather than analytical.
Grade 6 response (clear, thoughtful explanation):
Shakespeare's Witches would have alarmed a Jacobean audience because belief in witchcraft was widespread and the 1604 Witchcraft Act made it a capital offence. James I had personally presided over witch trials and wrote Daemonologie, so Shakespeare's decision to place the Witches at the very start of the play both flatters the king's interests and taps into real public anxiety. The phrase "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" shows how the Witches invert moral categories, which mirrors the Jacobean fear that witchcraft could overturn God's natural order.
Commentary: This reaches AQA Level 4 ("clear, thoughtful explanation"): context is specific and connected to a short quotation, and the student explains why the choice matters. What holds it back from Level 6 is limited exploration of method — the chiasmus is noticed but not named or unpacked structurally.
Grade 9 response (convincing, critical analysis and exploration):
Shakespeare's Witches function as a dramatic embodiment of the Jacobean anxieties surrounding the 1604 Witchcraft Act and the Gunpowder Plot of 1605; their chiastic declaration that "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" is not merely ominous but structurally subversive, as the mirrored syntax collapses the moral binaries on which the Great Chain of Being depended. By staging this inversion before Duncan has even appeared, Shakespeare frames legitimate kingship as something already encircled by forces it cannot see — a conceit that would have resonated sharply with an audience that had recently learned how close parliament had come to destruction. The trochaic metre separates the Witches from the iambic order of the court, marking their language itself as a rupture in the natural rhythm of authority.
Commentary: This hits AQA Level 6 ("convincing, critical analysis and exploration"): the student conceptualises the opening as a structural argument about order, uses "judicious" short references, names method (chiasmus, trochaic metre), and weaves three strands of context (Witchcraft Act, Gunpowder Plot, Great Chain of Being) into the analysis rather than appending them.
Examiners reward candidates who treat context as an interpretive lens rather than a bolt-on. The strongest responses name specific frameworks — Divine Right of Kings, Great Chain of Being, the 1604 Witchcraft Act, the Gunpowder Plot — and show how the play's language or structure enacts those ideas, rather than simply listing them in a concluding sentence. Reports consistently note that weaker answers "stick" context to the end of paragraphs, while Level 6 responses weave it into analysis of method. Pitfalls to avoid include contextual overreach (claiming everyone in 1606 believed the same thing), anachronism (importing modern feminist or psychoanalytic language without framing it as a critical reading), and contextual name-dropping with no textual anchor. Moments especially worth naming include the Witches' opening, Duncan's arrival at Inverness, the Porter's equivocation scene, and Malcolm's closing speech.
Some critics argue that Macbeth can be read as a piece of Jacobean political theatre designed to legitimise James I's Stuart line: the play's flattering treatment of Banquo — James's supposed ancestor — and the framing of regicide as cosmically catastrophic both serve the interests of a monarch anxious about his own legitimacy. Another reading foregrounds the play's ideological work more sceptically, arguing that Shakespeare dramatises the cost of divine-right ideology as much as its authority: the play insists that regicide unmakes the world, but it also gives Macbeth soliloquies of genuine moral complexity, inviting the audience to feel the pull of the very ambition the play condemns. A historicist reading might add that Macbeth is shaped by the 1605 Gunpowder Plot's aftermath, when equivocation — the Jesuit practice of telling truths that conceal lies — became a live political term; the Witches' equivocal prophecies replay that anxiety on stage.
Macbeth was written in a world where kings ruled by divine right, witchcraft was a capital offence, and a recent assassination attempt had shaken the nation. Every choice Shakespeare makes — from the Scottish setting to the supernatural elements to the stark consequences of regicide — is shaped by this context. Understanding this world is the foundation for everything that follows.
This content is aligned with the AQA GCSE English Literature (8702) specification.