You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Never Let Me Go is, at its core, a novel about what it means to be human. Ishiguro uses the cloning premise to strip this question down to its essentials: if you create a being that thinks, feels, loves, and grieves, is it human? And if society decides it is not, what does that reveal about society? This lesson explores the interconnected themes of humanity, identity, and the soul.
The central thematic question of the novel is: do the clones have souls?
Hailsham was founded on the premise that clones do have souls, and that art can prove it:
"We took away your art because we thought it would reveal your souls. Or to put it more finely, we did it to prove you had souls at all." — Miss Emily (Chapter 22)
The Gallery exists to collect the best student artwork and present it to the outside world as evidence that clones are capable of genuine creativity, imagination, and feeling.
Society does not want to know. Miss Emily explains:
"How can you ask a world that has come to regard cancer as curable, how can you ask such a world to put away that cure ... for the sake of these students?"
The novel's critique is devastating: it is not that society fails to recognise the clones' humanity — it is that society chooses not to recognise it because doing so would threaten its own comfort.
Ishiguro forces the reader to confront the question directly. By the time we learn the full truth about the cloning programme, we already know Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth as fully realised human beings. The reader's emotional response — grief, outrage, horror — is itself the proof that the clones have souls.
Examiner's tip: This is a powerful essay argument. You could write: "Ishiguro structures the novel so that the reader's own emotional response becomes the proof of the clones' humanity. By making us love Kathy and Tommy before we fully understand their fate, he demonstrates that the question 'do they have souls?' answers itself — and implicates anyone who would deny it."
Art functions in the novel as the supposed measure of humanity:
| Character | Relationship with art | What it reveals |
|---|---|---|
| Kathy | Creative but practical; her writing is her art | Her narration is itself a creative act — proof of her humanity |
| Tommy | Cannot create at Hailsham; later makes intricate drawings | His late creativity proves he has a soul — but too late for it to matter |
| Ruth | Competent but imitative | Her art, like her behaviour, borrows from others |
| The guardians | Collect art for the Gallery | They believe art can prove the clones' souls |
Ishiguro is deeply sceptical of the idea that art can "prove" humanity:
Examiner's tip: A sophisticated response will critique the Gallery, not just describe it. For example: "Ishiguro presents the Gallery as a well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed project — it places the burden of proof on the victims rather than the perpetrators, asking the clones to demonstrate their humanity rather than asking society to examine its own."
The clones' identities are systematically denied, distorted, and constrained:
The clones' search for their "possibles" — the original humans they were cloned from — reveals a desperate need for origin, belonging, and identity:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| What the clones hope | That their possibles will reveal something about who they truly are |
| What they find | The woman in Norfolk is nothing like Ruth |
| What this means | Their identities cannot be derived from their genetic originals |
| Ruth's reaction | "We all know it. We're modelled from trash." |
The "possibles" episode forces the clones — and the reader — to confront the question: if your identity does not come from your origins, where does it come from?
The clones' identities are shaped by their conditioning at Hailsham:
Examiner's tip: Identity and conditioning are closely linked in the novel. You could write: "Ishiguro presents identity in Never Let Me Go as a product of institutional conditioning. The clones' inability to imagine alternative futures is not a personal failing but a deliberate outcome of a system designed to produce compliant donors."
Ishiguro explores dehumanisation through several interconnected techniques:
| Euphemism | What it actually means |
|---|---|
| "Donations" | Forced organ harvesting |
| "Completions" | Death from organ removal |
| "Carers" | Fellow clones who tend donors until they die |
| "Possibles" | The original humans the clones were copied from |
| "Students" | Children raised to be organ donors |
| "Guardians" | Adults who maintain the system while managing the clones |
The language itself is a tool of dehumanisation — it sanitises the horror and makes it speakable, manageable, normal.
| Institution | How it dehumanises |
|---|---|
| Hailsham | Raises clones in comfort but with no autonomy or future |
| The Cottages | Offers the illusion of freedom within a predetermined path |
| Recovery centres | Clinical, impersonal — clones are patients, not people |
| Society at large | Chooses not to see clones as human |
Despite everything, the clones are unmistakably human:
Ishiguro's point is clear: humanity is not something that can be conferred or denied by institutions — it is inherent in the capacity to feel.
Examiner's tip: Always link the theme of humanity to Ishiguro's purpose. For example: "Ishiguro does not ask whether the clones are human — the novel makes this self-evident. Instead, he asks how a society can look at beings who love, grieve, and create, and still deny their humanity. The answer — through euphemism, institutional distance, and wilful ignorance — is the novel's most devastating critique."
Ishiguro draws pointed parallels between the clones' lives and the lives of "normal" humans:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.