You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Extended response questions are where the biggest mark differentials occur between students. These questions — worth 6 or 9 marks — use levels-based marking and test your ability to construct a sustained, logical argument using accurate PE knowledge. This lesson gives you a step-by-step method for planning, writing, and checking extended responses to maximise your marks.
Extended response questions appear towards the end of each section on both papers. You will typically face:
| Paper | Number of Extended Questions | Mark Values |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 | 2–3 | Mix of 6-mark and 9-mark |
| Paper 2 | 2–3 | Mix of 6-mark and 9-mark |
Together, extended response questions are worth approximately 18–24 marks per paper — roughly 25–30% of the total. This means that getting these questions right can be the difference between a grade 5 and a grade 7, or between a grade 7 and a grade 9.
Exam Tip: Many students spend most of their revision time on content knowledge and very little on extended response technique. Dedicate at least 20% of your revision time specifically to practising extended answers. Even excellent knowledge will score poorly if it is not structured properly.
Unlike short answer questions (where each correct point earns 1 mark), extended responses use levels-based marking. The examiner reads your entire answer and decides which level it fits into based on the quality of your response overall.
| Level | Marks | Descriptor | What This Looks Like |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level 3 | 5–6 | Detailed knowledge and understanding. Clear, sustained line of reasoning. Effective use of terminology. Relevant sporting examples. Balanced analysis/evaluation. | A well-structured answer that demonstrates thorough knowledge, applies it to the context of the question, uses PE terminology throughout, and (for evaluate/discuss) presents both sides with a clear conclusion |
| Level 2 | 3–4 | Sound knowledge and understanding. Some reasoning but not fully sustained. Some terminology. Examples may be generic. Analysis/evaluation may be one-sided. | A reasonable answer that shows good knowledge but may lack structure, miss one side of the argument, use limited examples, or fail to sustain the argument throughout |
| Level 1 | 1–2 | Basic knowledge. Limited or no reasoning. Little or no terminology. No relevant examples. Description rather than analysis/evaluation. | A brief or superficial answer that lists a few facts without explanation, uses everyday language instead of PE terminology, and does not address the command word |
| Level 0 | 0 | Nothing creditworthy | No relevant content |
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Level 3 | 7–9 | Detailed knowledge and understanding with a sustained, clear line of reasoning. Accurate and relevant use of terminology. Relevant and well-developed sporting examples. Thorough and balanced analysis/evaluation. |
| Level 2 | 4–6 | Sound knowledge and understanding with some reasoning. Appropriate use of terminology in places. Some relevant examples. Partial analysis/evaluation, may be unbalanced. |
| Level 1 | 1–3 | Basic or limited knowledge. Minimal reasoning. Little or no terminology. Generic or no examples. Descriptive rather than analytical. |
Exam Tip: The key difference between Level 2 and Level 3 is the word "sustained." A Level 3 answer maintains a clear, logical argument from start to finish. Every paragraph connects to the one before it and to the overall question. A Level 2 answer has some good points but they feel disconnected or incomplete.
The PEE chain is the fundamental building block of extended responses. Each developed argument should follow this structure:
| Element | What It Is | Example (Topic: Benefits of Warming Up) |
|---|---|---|
| Point | A clear statement that directly answers the question | "One benefit of warming up is that it reduces the risk of injury." |
| Evidence | A fact, statistic, or PE concept that supports the point | "This is because warming up increases the temperature of the muscles, making them more elastic and pliable." |
| Explain | A further development that shows the significance or consequence | "As a result, the muscles and tendons are less likely to tear during explosive movements such as sprinting, which means the performer can train more consistently without missing sessions due to injury." |
A strong extended answer typically contains 3–4 PEE chains (for a 6-mark question) or 4–5 PEE chains (for a 9-mark question). Each chain makes a new, distinct point.
graph TD
A["Point 1"] --> B["Evidence 1"]
B --> C["Explain 1"]
C --> D["Point 2"]
D --> E["Evidence 2"]
E --> F["Explain 2"]
F --> G["Point 3"]
G --> H["Evidence 3"]
H --> I["Explain 3"]
I --> J["Conclusion"]
style A fill:#27ae60,color:#fff
style B fill:#2980b9,color:#fff
style C fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff
style D fill:#27ae60,color:#fff
style E fill:#2980b9,color:#fff
style F fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff
style G fill:#27ae60,color:#fff
style H fill:#2980b9,color:#fff
style I fill:#8e44ad,color:#fff
style J fill:#e74c3c,color:#fff
Never start writing an extended response immediately. Spend 1–2 minutes planning.
For evaluate questions, split your plan into two columns:
| For / Advantages / Positive | Against / Disadvantages / Negative |
|---|---|
| Point 1 | Counter-point 1 |
| Point 2 | Counter-point 2 |
| Point 3 | Counter-point 3 |
| Conclusion: Which side is stronger and why? |
Discuss questions are similar to evaluate questions but may not always require a judgement. Still, a conclusion strengthens your answer.
For analyse questions, break the topic into its component parts and examine each:
| Component | How It Works | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Component 1 | Explanation | Significance |
| Component 2 | Explanation | Significance |
| Component 3 | Explanation | Significance |
Exam Tip: Your plan does not need to be neat — it is for your eyes only. Use abbreviations, arrows, and shorthand. The time you spend planning is repaid many times over through a more structured, coherent answer that reaches Level 3.
Start with a brief statement that shows you understand the question. Do not waste time restating the question or writing a lengthy introduction.
Weak opening: "In this essay I am going to evaluate the use of technology in sport. Technology is something that is used in many sports and has many advantages and disadvantages."
Strong opening: "Technology in sport has transformed both performance and officiating, but its use remains controversial due to cost, accessibility, and the impact on the flow of competition."
Each paragraph should contain one PEE chain. Start each paragraph with a clear topic sentence (the Point), then develop it with Evidence and Explanation.
Connective words and phrases to use:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.