You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson covers three key training methods required by the AQA GCSE PE specification (3.1.3): continuous training, fartlek training, and interval training (including High-Intensity Interval Training — HIIT). For each method, you need to know the definition, how it is performed, who benefits from it, and its advantages and disadvantages.
Continuous training involves working at a steady, moderate intensity for a sustained period of time without rest. The activity is performed at the same pace throughout, typically at 60–80% of maximum heart rate (the aerobic training zone).
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Improves cardiovascular endurance | Can become tedious and boring due to the steady pace |
| Simple to perform — no specialist equipment needed | Does not improve speed or anaerobic fitness |
| Can be done almost anywhere (running outdoors, cycling) | Requires a significant time commitment (30+ minutes) |
| Low risk of injury due to moderate intensity | May not be sport-specific for activities that require changes of pace |
| Good for beginners and those building a fitness base | Can cause overuse injuries (e.g., shin splints, knee pain) if done on hard surfaces repeatedly |
| Easy to monitor using heart rate | Does not develop power or strength |
Exam Tip: When describing continuous training, always specify that it involves working at a steady pace with no rest. These are the two defining features that distinguish it from other methods.
Fartlek training (Swedish for "speed play") involves varying the intensity of exercise throughout a session by alternating between fast and slow speeds. Unlike interval training, the changes in pace are not strictly timed — they can be random or based on terrain.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Develops both aerobic and anaerobic fitness | Difficult to monitor intensity precisely (no set work/rest ratios) |
| Varied — reduces tedium compared to continuous training | Hard to ensure the performer is working hard enough during high-intensity phases |
| Can be adapted to any sport or fitness level | Less structured than interval training — may lack progression if not planned carefully |
| Can be done outdoors using natural terrain | Requires self-discipline to maintain effort during fast phases |
| Sport-specific for games that involve changes of pace | Can be difficult for beginners to manage varying intensities |
| No equipment needed | Weather-dependent if done outdoors |
| Feature | Continuous Training | Fartlek Training |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity | Steady, moderate | Varied (high and low) |
| Rest | None | Active recovery (jogging/walking) |
| Energy system | Aerobic only | Aerobic and anaerobic |
| Best for | Endurance athletes | Games players, middle-distance runners |
| Tedium | Higher risk of boredom | More varied and engaging |
Interval training involves alternating between periods of high-intensity work and periods of rest or low-intensity recovery. The work and rest periods are precisely timed and structured, which distinguishes interval training from fartlek.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.