You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Statistics and data can give your Section B essay a sense of rigour and authority that purely abstract reasoning often lacks. A well-placed statistical reference signals to the examiner that you are grounding your argument in evidence, not just opinion.
But here is the challenge: you are writing from memory, under time pressure, with no access to sources. You cannot look up exact figures. You may not remember precise statistics. And yet, a vague or incorrect statistical claim can do more harm than good.
This lesson teaches you how to reference general statistical trends responsibly, use hedging language effectively, and avoid the traps that undermine credibility.
In a Section B essay, using statistics does not mean:
It does mean:
| What Examiners Want to See | What They Don't Want to See |
|---|---|
| Awareness that evidence exists to support your claims | Made-up statistics presented as fact |
| Responsible hedging when you're uncertain | False precision that could be inaccurate |
| Reference to real-world data, even if approximate | Abstract arguments with no connection to evidence |
| Intellectual honesty about the limits of your knowledge | Confident assertion of dubious numbers |
When you remember the general direction of a statistic but not the exact figure, use language that acknowledges this honestly:
| Situation | Phrasing |
|---|---|
| You remember a rough figure | "Approximately...", "Roughly...", "In the region of..." |
| You remember the scale but not the number | "Hundreds of thousands...", "A significant majority...", "A substantial minority..." |
| You remember the trend but not the data | "Research consistently shows that...", "The evidence suggests that...", "Studies have indicated that..." |
| You know evidence exists but can't recall specifics | "There is considerable evidence that...", "It is widely documented that..." |
Too precise (risky):
"67.3% of UK adults support the legalisation of cannabis, according to a 2023 YouGov poll."
If this figure is wrong — and you are writing from memory, so it might well be — it undermines your credibility entirely.
Responsibly approximated:
"Polling data in recent years has consistently shown that a majority of the British public supports some form of cannabis law reform, though the extent of this support varies depending on how the question is framed."
This is accurate, honest, and impossible to fault — while still conveying the same substantive point.
Another example:
Too precise:
"The UK's prison population is 85,764."
Responsibly approximated:
"The UK has one of the highest per-capita prison populations in Western Europe, with approximately 80,000 people currently incarcerated."
Even if the exact number is slightly different, the substantive point — that the UK imprisons a relatively large proportion of its population — is well-established and defensible.
Certain statistical claims are so well-established that you can reference them without fear of inaccuracy. Here are some examples:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.