You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Spec Mapping — OCR H420 Module 6.1.2 — Patterns of inheritance, content statements covering epistasis as a deviation from independent-assortment Mendelian ratios in dihybrid crosses, including recessive, dominant and complementary epistasis (refer to the official OCR H420 specification document for exact wording). Epistasis joins linkage as one of the two key reasons that observed dihybrid ratios deviate from 9:3:3:1; the chi-squared test you have already met provides the formal tool to assess whether observed deviations are statistically significant.
The historical insight comes from William Bateson and Reginald Punnett (1905, paraphrased), who in their early dihybrid experiments with comb shape in chickens noticed F2 ratios that summed to 16 but were not 9:3:3:1. They proposed that the four classes had been merged — two phenotypes that looked identical despite different genotypes. The principle, christened epistasis (from Greek "standing upon"), is now a cornerstone of genetic analysis: when genes function in linked biochemical pathways or developmental cascades, one gene's product can mask or modify the expression of another.
Mendelian ratios assume that each gene acts independently of the others. In reality, many phenotypes are the result of several genes acting together, and sometimes the alleles at one locus mask or modify the expression of alleles at another. This phenomenon is called epistasis, and it is a major reason why dihybrid ratios in nature often deviate from the classic 9:3:3:1. OCR A-Level Biology A specification module 6.1.2(e) requires you to understand epistasis and to work out modified phenotypic ratios in dihybrid crosses.
Key Definitions:
- Epistasis — the interaction of different genes at different loci where one gene (the epistatic gene) masks or modifies the effect of another (the hypostatic gene).
- Recessive epistasis — masking occurs only when the epistatic gene is homozygous recessive. Modified ratio: 9 : 3 : 4.
- Dominant epistasis — masking occurs in the presence of even one dominant allele at the epistatic locus. Modified ratio: 12 : 3 : 1.
- Complementary epistasis — two genes must both be expressed for a phenotype to appear. Modified ratio: 9 : 7.
A dihybrid cross between two heterozygotes (AaBb × AaBb) should give a 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio, as the Punnett square below shows:
| AB | Ab | aB | ab | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB | AABB | AABb | AaBB | AaBb |
| Ab | AABb | AAbb | AaBb | Aabb |
| aB | AaBB | AaBb | aaBB | aaBb |
| ab | AaBb | Aabb | aaBb | aabb |
Sixteen equally likely outcomes group into:
Epistasis combines some of these classes together, because the visible phenotypes overlap.
When the homozygous recessive genotype at one locus masks the phenotype at the other.
Mouse coat colour depends on two genes:
The cc genotype is epistatic to the agouti/black gene — it blocks the earlier step in the pigment pathway. A cc mouse cannot make any pigment at all, so whatever alleles it has at the A locus are irrelevant.
Cross two dihybrid mice CcAa × CcAa:
The two albino classes merge: 9 agouti : 3 black : 4 albino — the classic 9:3:4 recessive epistasis ratio.
flowchart LR
CCAA[CcAa x CcAa] --> P1[9 agouti]
CCAA --> P2[3 black]
CCAA --> P3[3 albino cc A_]
CCAA --> P4[1 albino cc aa]
P3 --> M[Merged 4 albino]
P4 --> M
The two genes act sequentially in a biochemical pathway. Gene C catalyses the first step — without a functional C enzyme, no pigment precursor is made, and gene A has nothing to modify. Blocking an early step makes later steps irrelevant: that is the essence of recessive epistasis.
When a single dominant allele at one locus masks the phenotype at the other.
In summer squash, colour depends on two genes:
Gene W is dominant-epistatic: its dominant allele produces an inhibitor of pigment production, so W_ squash are white no matter what alleles they have at the Y locus.
Cross two dihybrids WwYy × WwYy:
The two "W_" classes merge: 12 white : 3 yellow : 1 green — the classic 12:3:1 dominant epistasis ratio.
When dominant alleles at BOTH loci are required for any expression at all.
Cross two white-flowered sweet pea strains (both from different breeds) and the F1 are all purple. When the F1 are crossed, the F2 show 9 purple : 7 white. Why?
| Type of epistasis | Mechanism | Modified ratio |
|---|---|---|
| None (independent) | Alleles act independently | 9 : 3 : 3 : 1 |
| Recessive epistasis | Homozygous recessive at one locus masks the other | 9 : 3 : 4 |
| Dominant epistasis | Dominant allele at one locus masks the other | 12 : 3 : 1 |
| Complementary (duplicate recessive) | Both loci must have a dominant allele | 9 : 7 |
Labradors have three coat colours: black, chocolate and yellow. Two genes are involved:
The ee genotype is epistatic to the B gene. Cross two dihybrid black Labradors (BbEe × BbEe):
Ratio: 9 black : 3 chocolate : 4 yellow — recessive epistasis, because the ee (homozygous recessive at E) is doing the masking.
If an exam question gives you a modified ratio (e.g. 9:3:4 or 12:3:1), do not just recite "this is epistasis". Explain why by describing the biochemical pathway: which gene is upstream, which is masked, and what makes the classes overlap. The marks are often for the mechanistic explanation, not the label.
The biochemical logic of recessive epistasis is best seen as a sequential pathway in which the upstream gene controls a substrate that the downstream gene further modifies.
<line x1="100" y1="20" x2="160" y2="20" stroke="#444" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrow1)"/>
<text x="130" y="12" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#222">C</text>
<text x="130" y="35" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#444">tyrosinase</text>
<rect x="160" y="0" width="100" height="40" fill="#cde3f7" stroke="#1f6feb"/>
<text x="210" y="25" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#222">Eumelanin</text>
<line x1="260" y1="20" x2="320" y2="20" stroke="#444" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrow2)"/>
<text x="290" y="12" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#222">A</text>
<text x="290" y="35" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#444">agouti gene</text>
<rect x="320" y="0" width="100" height="40" fill="#fde9b8" stroke="#a07b00"/>
<text x="370" y="25" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#222">Agouti coat</text>
The crucial principle: cc blocks step 1, so anything that gene A would have done downstream becomes irrelevant. The two "albino" genotype classes (3 ccA_ and 1 ccaa) merge into a single phenotypic class, giving the 9:3:4 ratio. Whenever you see a ratio summing to 16 with one class merged, ask: which gene is upstream in the biochemical pathway?
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.