You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Spec Mapping — OCR H432 Module 5.3.1 — Transition elements (complex-ion nomenclature), covering the systematic IUPAC naming of transition-metal complex ions: alphabetical ligand order using ligand-root letters (ignoring multiplying prefixes); standard ligand names (aqua, ammine, chloro/chlorido, hydroxo, cyano, carbonyl) with anionic ligands ending in -o; the Greek multiplying prefixes di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa- for simple ligands and bis-, tris-, tetrakis- for complicated or bidentate ligand names; the Latin-stem + -ate suffix (cuprate, ferrate, plumbate, aurate, stannate, manganate) for the metal in anionic complexes; the Roman-numeral oxidation state of the central metal enclosed in parentheses; and the two-way translation between formula (e.g. [Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]²⁺) and name (tetraamminediaquacopper(II)) (refer to the official OCR H432 specification document for exact wording).
Naming complex ions is one of the few corners of A-Level chemistry where there is no flexibility — the IUPAC rules are precise, the spelling of ammine (two m's) must be exact, and a missing Roman numeral costs a mark every time it appears in a mark scheme. The good news is that the rules are simple, finite, and entirely learnable: five steps, six ligand names, six Latin metal stems, and a small set of Greek multiplying prefixes. The bad news is that examiners use this topic to make subtle decisions between band-discriminator candidates — hexaaquacopper(II) with single m loses the mark; hexaaquacopper(2) with an Arabic number loses the mark; tetrachlorocopper(II) without the -ate suffix on an anionic complex loses the mark. This lesson presents the rules systematically, gives ten worked examples covering every variation OCR has asked, and rehearses the formula↔name translations in both directions so that the candidate can read a complex name aloud, write its formula, and predict its structure without hesitation.
Key Definition — Nomenclature of complex ions is the systematic IUPAC method of naming a transition-metal complex by (1) listing ligands alphabetically by root with Greek multiplying prefixes; (2) appending the metal name (Latin stem + -ate if the complex is anionic; English name otherwise); and (3) adding the metal oxidation state in Roman numerals inside parentheses. The reverse process — converting a name into a formula — uses the same rules: identify each ligand and its count, identify the metal and its oxidation state, assemble inside square brackets with a superscript overall charge.
By the end of this lesson you should be able to:
Every complex name you write follows the same five-step recipe. Memorise the recipe; the rest of the lesson is just practice applying it.
graph TD
A["Complex ion formula<br/>e.g. [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+"] --> B["Step 1: identify ligands<br/>4 NH3 + 2 H2O"]
B --> C["Step 2: alphabetise by root<br/>ammine before aqua"]
C --> D["Step 3: Greek prefixes<br/>tetraammine + diaqua"]
D --> E["Step 4: metal name<br/>cationic, so 'copper'"]
E --> F["Step 5: Roman numeral<br/>+2 oxidation state = (II)"]
F --> G["Final name:<br/>tetraamminediaquacopper(II)"]
The ligand names used in nomenclature are not always the same as the molecule or ion names. Anionic ligands end in -o (older IUPAC) or -ido (newer 2005 IUPAC); OCR accepts both, but the -o form is what appears on past papers.
| Ligand formula | Ligand name in complex | Donor atom | Charge |
|---|---|---|---|
| H₂O | aqua | O | 0 |
| NH₃ | ammine (two m's!) | N | 0 |
| Cl⁻ | chloro (or chlorido) | Cl | −1 |
| OH⁻ | hydroxo (or hydroxido) | O | −1 |
| CN⁻ | cyano (or cyanido) | C | −1 |
| CO | carbonyl | C | 0 |
| F⁻ | fluoro | F | −1 |
| Br⁻ | bromo | Br | −1 |
| I⁻ | iodo | I | −1 |
| NO₂⁻ | nitro (N-bound) or nitrito (O-bound) | N or O | −1 |
| O²⁻ | oxo | O | −2 |
| H⁻ | hydrido | H | −1 |
| en | en or 1,2-diaminoethane (bis/tris) | 2 × N | 0 |
| C₂O₄²⁻ | ethanedioato (oxalato) (bis/tris) | 2 × O | −2 |
| EDTA⁴⁻ | edta or ethylenediaminetetraacetato | 2 × N + 4 × O | −4 |
Spelling alert: ammine has two m's (the NH₃ ligand); amine has one m (the organic R–NH₂ functional group). The double-m spelling distinguishes the two senses of the word — OCR mark schemes are unforgiving about this.
Use the Greek prefixes for simple ligand names:
| Number | Prefix | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | (none) | [Ag(CN)₂]⁻ — dicyanoargentate(I), one Ag |
| 2 | di- | diaqua, dichloro, diammine |
| 3 | tri- | trichloro, triammine |
| 4 | tetra- | tetraaqua, tetrachloro, tetraammine |
| 5 | penta- | pentaaqua, pentaammine |
| 6 | hexa- | hexaaqua, hexaammine, hexacyano |
Use the bis-/tris-/tetrakis- prefixes only when:
| Number | bis-/tris- prefix | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | bis- | bis(ethanedioato), bis(1,2-diaminoethane) |
| 3 | tris- | tris(ethanedioato), tris(1,2-diaminoethane) |
| 4 | tetrakis- | tetrakis(pyridine) (not common in OCR) |
When the overall charge on the complex is negative, the metal takes its Latin stem with the -ate suffix:
| Metal | English name | Latin root | Anionic name | Example complex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | iron | ferr- | ferrate | [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ = hexacyanoferrate(III) |
| Cu | copper | cupr- | cuprate | [CuCl₄]²⁻ = tetrachlorocuprate(II) |
| Ag | silver | argent- | argentate | [Ag(CN)₂]⁻ = dicyanoargentate(I) |
| Au | gold | aur- | aurate | [AuCl₄]⁻ = tetrachloroaurate(III) |
| Pb | lead | plumb- | plumbate | [Pb(OH)₄]²⁻ = tetrahydroxoplumbate(II) |
| Sn | tin | stann- | stannate | [Sn(OH)₆]²⁻ = hexahydroxostannate(IV) |
| Mn | manganese | mangan- | manganate | MnO₄⁻ = tetraoxomanganate(VII) (permanganate) |
Other transition metals (Co, Ni, Cr, Zn) keep their normal English name + -ate: cobaltate, nickelate, chromate, zincate. The -ate suffix is the cue that tells the reader the overall charge is negative — without it, a name like "hexacyanoiron(III)" is ambiguous (is the complex positive or negative?).
Cationic and neutral complexes keep the normal metal name with no suffix: copper, iron, cobalt, chromium, nickel, manganese.
The metal oxidation state is not explicitly written in the formula — you must calculate it from the overall complex charge and the sum of the ligand charges. The rule:
x+sumtext(ligandcharges)=text(overallcomplexcharge)
Where x is the metal oxidation state. Solve for x.
| Complex | Ligand charges | Equation | Metal oxidation state |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ | 6 × 0 = 0 | x + 0 = +2 | +2 (II) |
| [CuCl₄]²⁻ | 4 × (−1) = −4 | x − 4 = −2 | +2 (II) |
| [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ | 6 × (−1) = −6 | x − 6 = −3 | +3 (III) |
| [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ | 6 × 0 = 0 | x + 0 = +3 | +3 (III) |
| [Cr(OH)₆]³⁻ | 6 × (−1) = −6 | x − 6 = −3 | +3 (III) |
| MnO₄⁻ | 4 × (−2) = −8 | x − 8 = −1 | +7 (VII) |
| [Pt(NH₃)₂Cl₂] | 0 + 2(−1) = −2 | x − 2 = 0 | +2 (II) |
| [Ni(en)(C₂O₄)₂]²⁻ | 0 + 2(−2) = −4 | x − 4 = −2 | +2 (II) |
| [Fe(EDTA)]⁻ | −4 | x − 4 = −1 | +3 (III) |
For comparison, [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ has Fe(III): x + 6(−1) = −3 → x = +3 → hexacyanoferrate(III) (ferricyanide).
This is the species formed when Cr(OH)₃ dissolves in excess NaOH (amphoteric behaviour, lesson 5).
This species is formed when [Fe(H₂O)₆]³⁺ hydrolyses slightly in acidic aqueous solution (the OCR Module 5.3.1 qualitative-analysis link to acidic Fe³⁺ solutions).
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.